Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces motion of the spine and influences coupled motion: a finite element analysis.

Curve correction Finite element method Fusionless Growth modulation Scoliosis Spine Vertebral body tethering

Journal

Computers in biology and medicine
ISSN: 1879-0534
Titre abrégé: Comput Biol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1250250

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 10 08 2023
revised: 30 11 2023
accepted: 11 12 2023
medline: 19 12 2023
pubmed: 19 12 2023
entrez: 19 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a novel fusionless treatment option for selected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients which is gaining widespread interest. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of tether pre-tension within VBT on the biomechanics of the spine including sagittal and transverse parameters as well as primary motion, coupled motion, and stresses acting on the L2 superior endplate. For that purpose, we used a calibrated and validated Finite Element model of the L1-L2 spine. The VBT instrumentation was inserted on the left side of the L1-L2 segment with different cord pre-tensions and submitted to an external pure moment of 6 Nm in different directions. The range of motion (ROM) for the instrumented spine was measured from the initial post-VBT position. The magnitudes of the ROM of the native spine and VBT-instrumented with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N were, respectively, 3.29°, 2.35°, 1.90° and 1.61° in extension, 3.30°, 3.46°, 2.79°, and 2.17° in flexion, 2.11°, 1.67°, 1.33° and 1.06° in right axial rotation, and 2.10°, 1.88°, 1.48° and 1.16° in left axial rotation. During flexion-extension, an insignificant coupled lateral bending motion was observed in the native spine. However, VBT instrumentation with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N generated coupled right lateral bending of 0.85°, 0.81°, and 0.71° during extension and coupled left lateral bending of 0.32°, 0.24°, and 0.19° during flexion, respectively. During lateral bending, a coupled extension motion of 0.33-0.40° is observed in the native spine, but VBT instrumentation with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N generates coupled flexion of 0.67°, 0.58°, and 0.42° during left (side of the implant) lateral bending and coupled extension of 1.28°, 1.07°, and 0.87° during right lateral bending, respectively. Therefore, vertebral body tethering generates coupled motion. Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces the motion of the spine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38113683
pii: S0010-4825(23)01316-1
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107851
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107851

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Per Trobisch:

Auteurs

Luis Fernando Nicolini (LF)

Group of Analysis and Mechanical Design - GRANTE, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil; Mechanical and Aerospace Technology Laboratory (NUMAE), Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil. Electronic address: nicolini.luis@ufsm.br.

Rafael Carreira Oliveira (RC)

Group of Analysis and Mechanical Design - GRANTE, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Marx Ribeiro (M)

Group of Analysis and Mechanical Design - GRANTE, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil; Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Marcus Stoffel (M)

Institute of General Mechanics (IAM), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

Bernd Markert (B)

Institute of General Mechanics (IAM), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

Philipp Kobbe (P)

Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Frank Hildebrand (F)

Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Per Trobisch (P)

Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.

Marcelo Simoni Simões (MS)

Biomechanical Engineering Laboratory - LEBm, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Roesler (CR)

Group of Analysis and Mechanical Design - GRANTE, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil; Biomechanical Engineering Laboratory - LEBm, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Eduardo Alberto Fancello (EA)

Group of Analysis and Mechanical Design - GRANTE, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil; Biomechanical Engineering Laboratory - LEBm, Dep. of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH