Mandating reimbursement for non-FDA-regulated cannabis is bad public policy.
CBD
FDA-regulation
THC
cannabis
mandate
marijuana
medical use
public health
reimbursement
Journal
Journal of addictive diseases
ISSN: 1545-0848
Titre abrégé: J Addict Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107051
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Dec 2023
19 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
20
12
2023
pubmed:
20
12
2023
entrez:
20
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
An influential cannabis lobby and its allies are engaged in an aggressive initiative to mandate health and worker's compensation insurance coverage for non-standardized, non-FDA-regulated cannabis products. If successful, mandated reimbursement would present a severe public health risk and force taxpayers to fund a risky and under-regulated industry. Leaders in psychiatry and other medical specialties have sounded the alarm about the marketing and sale of cannabis products for medical uses without prior review by the FDA. We echo their strong opposition to bills requiring workers' compensation carriers and health insurance plans to cover the cost of dispensary-purchased "medical" cannabis. Mandated insurance reimbursement of dispensary products is "a recipe for a public health disaster, as lowering or eliminating out-of-pocket costs will encourage more consumers to become certified under a state's medical cannabis program, and result in more frequent use of higher-potency cannabinoids (e.g., THC and CBD) that are associated with serious adverse events." Until there are thorough studies into these products, including adverse events, side effects and long-term concerns, these products should
Identifiants
pubmed: 38115193
doi: 10.1080/10550887.2023.2282032
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM