Increased syphilis testing and detection of late latent syphilis among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategy in an urban Australian sexual health clinic: a retrospective observational study.

Screening Sexually transmitted disease Sexually transmitted infection Syphilis Women's health

Journal

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific
ISSN: 2666-6065
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health West Pac
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101774968

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 21 05 2023
revised: 19 07 2023
accepted: 24 07 2023
medline: 20 12 2023
pubmed: 20 12 2023
entrez: 20 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) implemented an opt-out syphilis test for women in December 2017. We aimed to examine the differences in syphilis testing uptake and confirmed syphilis cases among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategies. This was a retrospective study examining all women attending the MSHC for the first time in periods of risk-based testing (2015-2017) and opt-out testing (2018-2020). We calculated the proportion of women who tested for syphilis and the proportion of women with confirmed syphilis in each period. A chi-square test was performed to determine the differences in proportion between the risk-based testing and opt-out periods. A total of 27,481 women (i.e. 13,059 in the risk-based testing period and 14,422 in the opt-out period) were included in the final analysis, and the mean age was 26.8 years (standard deviation = 6.9). The proportion of women who were tested for syphilis at their first consultation increased from 52.8% (6890/13,059) in the risk-based testing period to 67.4% (9725/14,422) in the opt-out period (p < 0.0001). Syphilis positivity did not differ between the two periods (0.48% [33/6890] vs 0.71% [69/9725], p = 0.061) but late latent causes increased from 36.4% [12/33] to 60.9% [42/69] (p = 0.033). The opt-out testing strategy increased syphilis testing among women with increased detection of asymptomatic late latent syphilis. The opt-out syphilis testing strategy is beneficial in sexual health services. Health education and awareness may be required to improve syphilis testing uptake. National Health and Medical Research Council.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) implemented an opt-out syphilis test for women in December 2017. We aimed to examine the differences in syphilis testing uptake and confirmed syphilis cases among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategies.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This was a retrospective study examining all women attending the MSHC for the first time in periods of risk-based testing (2015-2017) and opt-out testing (2018-2020). We calculated the proportion of women who tested for syphilis and the proportion of women with confirmed syphilis in each period. A chi-square test was performed to determine the differences in proportion between the risk-based testing and opt-out periods.
Findings UNASSIGNED
A total of 27,481 women (i.e. 13,059 in the risk-based testing period and 14,422 in the opt-out period) were included in the final analysis, and the mean age was 26.8 years (standard deviation = 6.9). The proportion of women who were tested for syphilis at their first consultation increased from 52.8% (6890/13,059) in the risk-based testing period to 67.4% (9725/14,422) in the opt-out period (p < 0.0001). Syphilis positivity did not differ between the two periods (0.48% [33/6890] vs 0.71% [69/9725], p = 0.061) but late latent causes increased from 36.4% [12/33] to 60.9% [42/69] (p = 0.033).
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
The opt-out testing strategy increased syphilis testing among women with increased detection of asymptomatic late latent syphilis. The opt-out syphilis testing strategy is beneficial in sexual health services. Health education and awareness may be required to improve syphilis testing uptake.
Funding UNASSIGNED
National Health and Medical Research Council.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38116502
doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100875
pii: S2666-6065(23)00193-1
pmc: PMC10730308
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100875

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

ELP has received an early-career research grant from Jack Brockhoff Foundation outside the submitted work. CSB has received the Australian Research Council (ARC) Industrial Research Transformation Hub Grant outside the submitted work, she has also received honorarium from Abbott outside the submitted work. EPFC has received investigator-initiated grants from MSD outside the submitted work, he has also received honorarium from MSD and CSL Seqirus outside the submitted work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Palak Gupta (P)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Christopher K Fairley (CK)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Marcus Y Chen (MY)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Catriona S Bradshaw (CS)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Glenda Fehler (G)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Erica L Plummer (EL)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Lenka A Vodstrcil (LA)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Julien Tran (J)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ei T Aung (ET)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Eric P F Chow (EPF)

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Classifications MeSH