Taking the Fear Out of Peer Feedback: A Brain-Friendly Peer Feedback Program.

Journal

The Journal of nursing administration

ISSN: 1539-0721

Titre abrégé: J Nurs Adm

Pays: United States

ID NLM: 1263116

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024

Historique:

medline: 20 12 2023

pubmed: 20 12 2023

entrez: 20 12 2023

Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Effective peer feedback is critical for the self-regulation of nursing practice and safe, high-quality care, yet peer feedback conversations can be challenging and anxiety provoking. As current literature revealed no consistent approach, taskforce members designed and implemented an innovative and standardized peer feedback program using brain science to support nurses' skills in speaking up. The new program resulted in an increase in nurses' self-reported willingness to provide peer feedback, and improvements in safety culture and nurse-sensitive quality outcomes.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001375 PMID: 38117151

pubmed: 38117151

doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001375

pii: 00005110-202401000-00009

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

40-46

Informations de copyright

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Références

American Nurses Association. Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice. 4th ed. Silver Spring, MD: Author; 2021.

Haag-Heitman B, George V. Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for Successful Practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2011.

American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC). 2023 Magnet® Application Manual. Washington, DC: Author; 2021.

George V, Haag-Heitman B. Peer review in nursing: essential components of a model supporting safety and quality. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(7-8):398–403.

George V, Haag-Heitman B. Nursing Peer Review: Creating Sustainable Outcomes. Franklin, WI: Nursing Consulting Partners; 2018.

The Joint Commission. Sentinel event data: general information & 2022 Q1, Q2 update. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/resources/patient-safety-topics/sentinel-event/sentinel-event-general_information-june-2022.pdf. Accessed September 16, 2022.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PSNet Patient Safety Network. High reliability. 2019. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/high-reliability. Accessed November 1, 2022.

Etchegaray JM, Ottosen MJ, Dancsak T, Thomas EJ. Barriers to speaking up about patient safety concerns. J Patient Saf. 2020;16(4):e230–e234.

Edmondson AC. Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In: Kramer RM, Cook KS, eds. The Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2004:239–272.

Landgren R, Alawadi Z, Douma C, Thomas EJ, Etchegaray J. Barriers of pediatric residents to speaking up about patient safety. Hosp Pediatr. 2016;6(12):738–743.

Schwappach DL, Gehring K. Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff's decisions to speak up about safety concerns. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:303.

Szymczak JE. Infections and interaction rituals in the organisation: clinician accounts of speaking up or remaining silent in the face of threats to patient safety. Sociol Health Illn. 2016;38(2):325–339.

Schwappach D, Richard A. Speak up–related climate and its association with healthcare workers' speaking up and withholding voice behaviours: a cross-sectional survey in Switzerland. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(10):827–835.

Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD. Why rejection hurts: a common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:294–300.

Ochsner KN, Lieberman MD. The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. Am Psychol. 2001;56:717–734.

Edmondson AC. Strategies of learning from failure. Harv Bus Rev. 2011;89:48–55.

Kannappan A, Yip DT, Lodhia NA, Morton J, Lau J. The effect of positive and negative verbal feedback on surgical skills performance and motivation. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(6):798–801.

Zenger J, Folkman J. Giving feedback: the ideal praise-to-criticism ratio. Harvard Business Review. 2013. https://hbr.org/2013/03/the-ideal-praise-to-criticism. Accessed January 15, 2023.

Hambley C. CONNECT©: a brain-friendly model for leaders and organizations. Consult Psycho J Pract Res. 2020;72(3):168–197.

Raio CM, Orederu TA, Palazzolo L, Shurick AA, Phelps EA. Cognitive emotion regulation fails the stress test. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:15139–15144.

Shaffer J. Neuroplasticity and clinical practice: building brain power for health. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1118.

Center for Creative Leadership. Use Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI)™ to understand intent. https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/closing-the-gap-between-intent-vs-impact-sbii/. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Press Ganey Associates. Safety culture trends. https://info.pressganey.com/e-books-research/safety-culture-trends. Accessed January 24, 2023.

Bowen-Brady H, Haag-Heitman B, Hunt V, Oot-Hayes M. Asking for feedback: clinical nurses' perceptions of a peer review program in a community hospital. J Nurs Adm. 2019;49(1):35–41.

Gnilka BH, El-Banna MM, Morgan MK. Communication-focused training improves nurses' confidence during peer-to-peer review. AAACN Viewpoint. 2020;42(2):3–6.

Murphy J, Lung C, Boerger JA, Powers J. Comprehensive nursing peer review: our voice, our practice, our growth. Nurs Manage. 2018;49(8):49–53.

Ryiz-Semmel J, France M, Bradshaw R, et al. Design and implementation of a face-to-face peer feedback program for ambulatory nursing. J Nurs Adm. 2019;49(3):143–149.

Semper J, Halvorson B, Hersh M, Torres C, Lillington L. Clinical nurse specialists guide staff nurses to promote practice accountability through peer review. Clin Nurse Spec. 2016;30(1):19–27.

LeClair-Smith C, Branum B, Bryant L, et al. Peer-to-peer feedback. J Nurs Adm. 2016;46(6):321–328.