trans-Cyclooctenes as Scavengers of Bromine Involved in Catalytic Bromination.
background reaction
bromine scavenger
probe
selective catalysis
trans-cyclooctene
Journal
Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)
ISSN: 1521-3765
Titre abrégé: Chemistry
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9513783
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Dec 2023
20 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
16
10
2023
medline:
20
12
2023
pubmed:
20
12
2023
entrez:
20
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Scavengers that capture reactive chemical substances are used to prevent the decomposition of materials. However, in the field of catalysis, the development of scavengers that inhibit background pathways has attracted little attention, although the concept will open up an otherwise inaccessible reaction space. In catalytic bromination, fast non-catalyzed background reactions disturb the catalytic control of the selectivity, even when using N-bromoamide reagents, which have a milder reactivity than bromine (Br
Identifiants
pubmed: 38117956
doi: 10.1002/chem.202303399
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e202303399Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Références
M. Carocho, P. Morales, I. C. F. R. Ferreira, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 284.
F. Tüdős, T. Földes-Berezsnich, Prog. Polym. Sci. 1989, 14, 717.
I. Riff, U.S. Patent WO 2002036531, May 10, 2002.
For spin-trapping agents, TEMPO etc., in radical reactions, see:
V. W. Bowry, K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4992; for a proton-trapping agent, 2,6-di(tert-butyl)pyridine, in Brønsted acid catalysis, see:
C. H. Cheon, H. Yamamoto, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3043.
Y. Kawato, A. Kubota, H. Ono, H. Egami, Y. Hamashima, Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1244;
Y. Kawato, H. Ono, A. Kubota, Y. Nagao, N. Morita, H. Egami, Y. Hamashima, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 2127;
Y. Nagao, T. Hisanaga, H. Egami, Y. Kawato, Y. Hamashima, Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 16758;
K. Yamashita, R. Hirokawa, M. Ichikawa, T. Hisanaga, Y. Nagao, R. Takita, K. Watanabe, Y. Kawato, Y. Hamashima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 3913.
For selected examples, see:
R. Nishiyori, J. R. J. Maynard, S. Shirakawa, Asian J. Org. Chem. 2020, 9, 192;
M. Hiraki, K. Okuno, R. Nishiyori, A. A. Noser, S. Shirakawa, Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 10907;
A. Tsuchihashi, S. Shirakawa, Synlett 2019, 30, 1662;
R. S. Klausen, C. R. Kennedy, A. M. Hyde, E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 12299;
X.-Y. Qiu, Z.-H. Li, J. Zhou, P.-F. Lian, L.-K. Dong, T.-M. Ding, H.-Y. Bai, S.-Y. Zhang, ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 7511;
D. Zhu, L. Yu, H.-Y. Luo, X.-S. Xue, Z.-M. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202211782.
For selected examples, see:
H. Xu, S. J. Zuend, M. G. Woll, Y. Tao, E. N. Jacobsen, Science 2010, 327, 986;
Y. Guo, M. C. Reis, J. Kootstra, S. R. Harutyunyan, ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 8476;
B. Pérez-Saavedra, Á. Velasco-Rubio, E. Rivera-Chao, J. A. Varela, C. Saá, M. Fañanás-Mastral, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 16206.
P. Auffinger, F. A. Hays, E. Westhof, P. S. Ho, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 16789;
T. Cernak, K. D. Dykstra, S. Tyagarajan, P. Vachal, S. W. Krska, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 546;
W.-J. Chung, C. D. Vanderwal, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4396;
M. R. Scholfield, M. C. Ford, A.-C. C. Carlsson, H. Butta, R. A. Mehl, P. S. Ho, Biochemistry 2017, 56, 2794;
H. S. Jang, X. Gu, R. B. Cooley, J. J. Porter, R. L. Henson, T. Willi, J. A. DiDonato, S. L. Hazen, R. A. Mehl, ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 562.
M. L. Tang, Z. Bao, Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 446.
D. Bulfield, S. M. Huber, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 14434;
R. L. Sutar, S. M. Huber, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9622;
J. Bamberger, F. Ostler, O. G. Mancheño, ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 5198.
A. de Meijere, S. Bräse, M. Oestreich, Metal Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More, 1st ed.; (Eds.: A. de Meijere, S. Bräse, M. Oestreich), Wiley-VCH, 2013;
K. C. Nicolaou, P. G. Bulger, D. Sarlah, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4442.
I. Saikia, A. J. Borah, P. Phukan, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 6837.
S. Minakata, Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1172;
E. Kolvari, A. Ghorbani-Choghamarani, P. Salehi, F. Shirini, M. A. Zolfigol, J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2007, 4, 126;
H. Veisi, R. Ghorbani-Vaghei, M. A. Zolfigol, Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2011, 43, 489;
V. S. C. de Andrade, M. C. S. de Mattos, Synthesis 2019, 51, 1841.
C. Djerassi, Chem. Rev. 1948, 43, 271.
S. L. Scinto, O. Ekanayake, U. Seneviratne, J. E. Pigga, S. J. Boyd, M. T. Taylor, J. Liu, C. W. am Ende, S. Rozovsky, J. M. Fox, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10932.
T. Nagano, S. Einaru, K. Shitamichi, K. Asano, S. Matsubara, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 7131.
S. Einaru, K. Shitamichi, T. Nagano, A. Matsumoto, K. Asano, S. Matsubara, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13863.
C. Ascheberg, J. Bock, F. Buß, C. Mück-Lichtenfeld, C. G. Daniliuc, K. Bergander, F. Dielmann, U. Hennecke, Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 11578;
J. Bock, C. G. Daniliuc, U. Hennecke, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 1704.
Results of further Lewis base screening are described in Scheme S1 in the Supporting Information.
For selected examples of identification of halogen species using Raman spectroscopy, see:
H. Haller, J. Schröder, S. Riedel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4937;
K. Sonnenberg, L. Mann, F. A. Redeker, B. Schmidt, S. Riedel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5464;
M. Uyanik, H. Hayashi, K. Ishihara, Science 2014, 345, 291;
M. Uyanik, T. Kato, N. Sahara, O. Katade, K. Ishihara, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 11619.
The mixtures of 1 a and more than 1 equivanent of Br2 exhibited the signal associated with Br2. In addition, 1H NMR analyses of the mixtures of Br2 and 1 a provided consistent results. See Schemes S2 and S3 in the Supporting Information for details.
The NMR analysis of the crude mixture of the reaction in Scheme 4 revealed 1 a was completely consumed, but there were side-products although they were unable to be isolated. Therefore, the isolated yield of the major product 10 was 25 % after careful purification through GPC.
A corresponding salt was generated as a single diastereomer through the reaction of trans-cyclooctene 1 a and I2. In addition, the reaction of cis-cyclooctene 5 a and I2 yielded the same diastereomer of the salt. These results suggest the reactions of 1 a with Br2 and I2 provide the corresponding salts through an SN1 mechanism, while the reactions of 5 a provide them through an SN2 mechanism. See Scheme S4 in the Supporting Information for details.
J. Strating, J. H. Wieringa, H. Wynberg, J. Chem. Soc. D 1969, 907;
H. Slebocka-Tilk, R. G. Ball, R. S. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4504.
Results of further chiral catalyst screening are described in Scheme S6 in the Supporting Information.
Z.-L. Zang, S. Zhao, S. Karnakanti, C.-L. Liu, P.-L. Shao, Y. He, Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 5014.
J. E. McMurry, J. Melton, J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 4367.
J. J. Gladfelder, S. Ghosh, M. Podunavac, A. W. Cook, Y. Ma, R. A. Woltornist, I. Keresztes, T. W. Hayton, D. B. Collum, A. Zakarian, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 15024.
G. A. Tolstikov, B. M. Lerman, T. A. Belogaeva, Synth. Commun. 1991, 21, 877.
R. Murata, K. Asano, S. Matsubara, Tetrahedron 2021, 97, 132381;
W. Yang, D.-M. Du, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5450;
B. Vakulya, S. Varga, A. Csámpai, T. Soós, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1967.
A. Jaganathan, A. Garzan, D. C. Whitehead, R. J. Staples, B. Borhan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2593.
N. Wu, A. Messinis, A. S. Batsanov, Z. Yang, A. Whiting, T. B. Marder, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9986.
A. L. Kohnen, J. R. Dunetz, R. L. Danheiser, Org. Synth. 2007, 84, 88.