How to use the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Core Outcome Set for atopic dermatitis trials: a users' guide.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 18 08 2023
revised: 08 12 2023
accepted: 08 12 2023
medline: 18 3 2024
pubmed: 21 12 2023
entrez: 20 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has agreed upon the Core Outcome Set (COS) for use in atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, but additional guidance is needed to maximize its uptake. To provide answers to some of the commonly asked questions about using the HOME COS; to provide data to help with the interpretation of trial results; and to support sample size calculations for future trials. We provide practical guidance on the use of the HOME COS for investigators planning clinical trials in patients with AD. It answers some of the common questions about using the HOME COS, how to access the outcome measurement instruments, what training/resources are needed to use them appropriately and clarifies when the COS is applicable. We also provide exemplar data to inform sample size calculations for eczema trials and encourage standardized data collection and reporting of the COS. By encouraging adoption of the COS and facilitating consistent reporting of outcome data, it is hoped that the results of eczema trials will be more comprehensive and readily combined in meta-analyses and that patient care will subsequently be improved.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has agreed upon the Core Outcome Set (COS) for use in atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, but additional guidance is needed to maximize its uptake.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To provide answers to some of the commonly asked questions about using the HOME COS; to provide data to help with the interpretation of trial results; and to support sample size calculations for future trials.
METHODS AND RESULTS RESULTS
We provide practical guidance on the use of the HOME COS for investigators planning clinical trials in patients with AD. It answers some of the common questions about using the HOME COS, how to access the outcome measurement instruments, what training/resources are needed to use them appropriately and clarifies when the COS is applicable. We also provide exemplar data to inform sample size calculations for eczema trials and encourage standardized data collection and reporting of the COS.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
By encouraging adoption of the COS and facilitating consistent reporting of outcome data, it is hoped that the results of eczema trials will be more comprehensive and readily combined in meta-analyses and that patient care will subsequently be improved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38123134
pii: 7484435
doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad497
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

527-535

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Auteurs

Kim S Thomas (KS)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Laura Howells (L)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Yael A Leshem (YA)

Division of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Eric L Simpson (EL)

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Christian Apfelbacher (C)

Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore.

Phyllis I Spuls (PI)

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Louise A A Gerbens (LAA)

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Michael E Jacobson (ME)

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Norito Katoh (N)

Department of Dermatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Hywel C Williams (HC)

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Beth L Stuart (BL)

Wolfston Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH