An updated nuclear-physics and multi-messenger astrophysics framework for binary neutron star mergers.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 23 02 2023
accepted: 24 11 2023
medline: 21 12 2023
pubmed: 21 12 2023
entrez: 20 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The multi-messenger detection of the gravitational-wave signal GW170817, the corresponding kilonova AT2017gfo and the short gamma-ray burst GRB170817A, as well as the observed afterglow has delivered a scientific breakthrough. For an accurate interpretation of all these different messengers, one requires robust theoretical models that describe the emitted gravitational-wave, the electromagnetic emission, and dense matter reliably. In addition, one needs efficient and accurate computational tools to ensure a correct cross-correlation between the models and the observational data. For this purpose, we have developed the Nuclear-physics and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics framework NMMA. The code allows incorporation of nuclear-physics constraints at low densities as well as X-ray and radio observations of isolated neutron stars. In previous works, the NMMA code has allowed us to constrain the equation of state of supranuclear dense matter, to measure the Hubble constant, and to compare dense-matter physics probed in neutron-star mergers and in heavy-ion collisions, and to classify electromagnetic observations and perform model selection. Here, we show an extension of the NMMA code as a first attempt of analyzing the gravitational-wave signal, the kilonova, and the gamma-ray burst afterglow simultaneously. Incorporating all available information, we estimate the radius of a 1.4M

Identifiants

pubmed: 38123551
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43932-6
pii: 10.1038/s41467-023-43932-6
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8352

Subventions

Organisme : Daimler und Benz Stiftung (Daimler and Benz Foundation)
ID : NUMANJI
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : PHY-2010970
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : OAC-2117997
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council)
ID : 2020-03330
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : 20220658ER
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : PHY-1806990

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
pubmed: 29099225 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
Andreoni, I. et al. Follow up of GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart by Australian-led observing programs. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 34, e069 (2017).
doi: 10.1017/pasa.2017.65
Chornock, R. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. IV. Detection of near-infrared signatures of r-process nucleosynthesis with Gemini-South. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L19 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905c
Coulter, D. A. et al. Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the Optical Counterpart to a Gravitational Wave Source. Science 358, 1556–1558 (2017).
Evans, P. et al. Swift and NuSTAR observations of GW170817: detection of a blue kilonova. Science 358, 1565 (2017).
pubmed: 29038371 doi: 10.1126/science.aap9580
Kasliwal, M. M. et al. Spitzer mid-infrared detections of neutron star merger GW170817 suggests synthesis of the heaviest elements. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, L7–L12 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz007
Kilpatrick, C. D. et al. Electromagnetic evidence that SSS17a is the result of a binary neutron star merger. Science 358, 1583–1587 (2017).
pubmed: 29038369 doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0073
Lipunov, V. M. et al. MASTER optical detection of the first LIGO/Virgo neutron star binary merger GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 850, L1 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa92c0
McCully, C. et al. The rapid reddening and featureless optical spectra of the optical counterpart of GW170817, AT 2017gfo, during the first four days. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L32 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9111
Shappee, B. J. et al. Early spectra of the gravitational wave source GW170817: evolution of a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1574 (2017).
pubmed: 29038374 doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0186
Tanvir, N. R. et al. The emergence of a lanthanide-rich kilonova following the merger of two neutron stars. Astrophys. J. 848, L27 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa90b6
Utsumi, Y. et al. J-GEM observations of an electromagnetic counterpart to the neutron star merger GW170817. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 69, 101 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx118
Margutti, R. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. V. Rising X-ray emission from an off-axis jet. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L20 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9057
Fong, W. et al. The optical afterglow of GW170817: an off-axis structured jet and deep constraints on a globular cluster origin. Astrophys. J. Lett. 883, L1 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3d9e
Lamb, G. P. et al. The optical afterglow of GW170817 at one year post-merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 870, L15 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf96b
Bauswein, A., Just, O., Janka, H.-T. & Stergioulas, N. Neutron-star radius constraints from GW170817 and future detections. Astrophys. J. 850, L34 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9994
Ruiz, M., Shapiro, S. L. & Tsokaros, A. GW170817, general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and the neutron star maximum mass. Phys. Rev. D97, 021501 (2018).
Radice, D., Perego, A., Zappa, F. & Bernuzzi, S. GW170817: joint constraint on the neutron star equation of state from multimessenger observations. Astrophys. J. 852, L29 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa402
Most, E. R., Weih, L. R., Rezzolla, L. & Schaffner-Bielich, J. New constraints on radii and tidal deformabilities of neutron stars from GW170817. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 261103 (2018).
pubmed: 30004744 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.261103
Coughlin, M. W., Dietrich, T., Margalit, B. & Metzger, B. D. Multimessenger Bayesian parameter inference of a binary neutron star merger. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 489, L91–L96 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz133
Capano, C. D. et al. Stringent constraints on neutron-star radii from multimessenger observations and nuclear theory. Nat. Astron. 4, 625–632 (2020).
Dietrich, T. et al. Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equation of state and the Hubble constant. Science 370, 1450–1453 (2020).
pubmed: 33335061 doi: 10.1126/science.abb4317
Huth, S. et al. Constraining neutron-star matter with microscopic and macroscopic collisions. Nature 606, 276–280 (2022)
Abbott, B. P. et al. A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24471 (2017).
Guidorzi, C. et al. Improved constraints on H
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaa009
Hotokezaka, K. et al. A Hubble constant measurement from superluminal motion of the jet in GW170817. Nat. Astron. 3, 940–944 (2019).
Coughlin, M. W. et al. On standardizing kilonovae and their use as standard candles to measure the Hubble constant. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022006 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.022006
Wang, H. & Giannios, D. Multimessenger parameter estimation of GW170817: from jet structure to the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. 908, 200 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd39c
Abbott, B. et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
Breschi, M. et al. AT2017gfo: Bayesian inference and model selection of multicomponent kilonovae and constraints on the neutron star equation of state. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 1661–1677 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1287
Nicholl, M. et al. Tight multimessenger constraints on the neutron star equation of state from GW170817 and a forward model for kilonova light-curve synthesis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 3016–3032 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1523
Raaijmakers, G. et al. The challenges ahead for multimessenger analyses of gravitational waves and kilonova: a case study on GW190425. Astrophys. J. 922, 269 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac222d
Pang, P. T. H. et al. Nuclear physics multimessenger astrophysics constraints on the neutron star equation of state: adding NICER’s PSR J0740+6620 measurement. Astrophys. J. 922, 14 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac19ab
Tews, I. et al. On the nature of GW190814 and its impact on the understanding of supranuclear matter. Astrophys. J. Lett. 908, L1 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdaae
Andreoni, I. et al. Fast-transient searches in real time with ZTFReST: identification of three optically discovered gamma-ray burst afterglows and new constraints on the kilonova rate. Astrophys. J. 918, 63 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0bc7
Ahumada, T. et al. Discovery and confirmation of the shortest gamma-ray burst from a collapsar. Nat. Astron. 5, 917–927 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01428-7
Lynn, J. E. et al. Chiral three-nucleon interactions in light nuclei, neutron-α scattering, and neutron matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 062501 (2016).
pubmed: 26918983 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.062501
Holt, J. W. & Kaiser, N. Equation of state of nuclear and neutron matter at third-order in perturbation theory from chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C95, 034326 (2017).
Drischler, C., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 042501 (2019).
pubmed: 30768314 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042501
Piarulli, M., Bombaci, I., Logoteta, D., Lovato, A. & Wiringa, R. B. Benchmark calculations of pure neutron matter with realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions. Phys. Rev. C 101, 045801 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.045801
Keller, J., Wellenhofer, C., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Neutron matter at finite temperature based on chiral effective field theory interactions. Phys. Rev. C. 103, 055806 (2021).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.055806
Russotto, P. et al. Results of the ASY-EOS experiment at GSI: the symmetry energy at suprasaturation density. Phys. Rev. C 94, 034608 (2016).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034608
Adhikari, D. et al. Accurate determination of the neutron skin thickness of
pubmed: 33988387 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.172502
Antoniadis, J. et al. A massive pulsar in a compact relativistic binary. Science 340, 6131 (2013).
doi: 10.1126/science.1233232
Arzoumanian, Z. et al. The NANOGrav 11-year data set: high-precision timing of 45 millisecond pulsars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 235, 37 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab5b0
Cromartie, H. T. et al. Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar. Nat. Astron. 4, 72–76 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2
Kurkela, A., Fraga, E. S., Schaffner-Bielich, J. & Vuorinen, A. Constraining neutron star matter with quantum chromodynamics. Astrophys. J. 789, 127 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/127
Komoltsev, O. & Kurkela, A. How perturbative QCD constrains the equation of state at neutron-star densities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202701 (2022).
Vallisneri, M. Use and abuse of the Fisher information matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects. Phys. Rev. D77, 042001 (2008).
Abbott, B. P. et al. Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817. Phys. Rev. X9, 011001 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011001
Coughlin, M. W. et al. Constraints on the neutron star equation of state from at2017gfo using radiative transfer simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 3871–3878 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2174
Heinzel, J. et al. Comparing inclination dependent analyses of kilonova transients. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 502, 3057–3065 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab221
Bulla, M. The critical role of nuclear heating rates, thermalization efficiencies and opacities for kilonova modelling and parameter inference. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520, 2558–2570 (2023).
Siegel, D. M. GW170817–the first observed neutron star merger and its kilonova: implications for the astrophysical site of the r-process. Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 203 (2019).
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12888-9
Radice, D. et al. Binary neutron star mergers: mass ejection, electromagnetic counterparts and nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 869, 130 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf054
Troja, E. et al. A year in the life of GW 170817: the rise and fall of a structured jet from a binary neutron star merger. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 1919–1926 (2019).
van Eerten, H., Zhang, W. & MacFadyen, A. Off-axis gamma-ray burst afterglow modeling based on a two-dimensional axisymmetric hydrodynamics simulation. Astrophys. J. 722, 235–247 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/235
Ryan, G., van Eerten, H., Piro, L. & Troja, E. Gamma-ray burst afterglows in the multimessenger era: numerical models and closure relations. Astrophys. J. 896, 166 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab93cf
Shrestha, M. et al. Impact of jets on kilonova photometric and polarimetric emission from binary neutron star mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523, 2990–3000 (2023).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1583
Anand, S. et al. Chemical distribution of the dynamical ejecta in the neutron star merger GW170817. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11080 (2023).
Baym, G., Pethick, C. & Sutherland, P. The ground state of matter at high densities: equation of state and stellar models. Astrophys. J. 170, 299 (1971).
doi: 10.1086/151216
Chamel, N. & Haensel, P. Physics of neutron star crusts. Living Rev. Relativ. 11, 10 (2008).
pubmed: 28163609 pmcid: 5255077 doi: 10.12942/lrr-2008-10
Tews, I. et al. Nuclear forces for precision nuclear physics—a collection of perspectives. Few-Body Syst 63, 67 (2022).
Krüger, T., Tews, I., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Neutron matter from chiral effective field theory interactions. Phys. Rev. C 88, 025802 (2013).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.025802
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Meissner, U.-G. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773–1825 (2009).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1773
Machleidt, R. & Entem, D. R. Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces. Phys. Rep. 503, 1–75 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001
Drischler, C., Melendez, J. A., Furnstahl, R. J. & Phillips, D. R. Quantifying uncertainties and correlations in the nuclear-matter equation of state. Phys. Rev. C 102, 054315 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054315
Weinberg, S. Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians. Phys. Lett. B 251, 288–292 (1990).
doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90938-3
Weinberg, S. Effective chiral Lagrangians for nucleon–pion interactions and nuclear forces. Nucl. Phys. B 363, 3–18 (1991).
doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90231-L
Weinberg, S. Three body interactions among nucleons and pions. Phys. Lett. B 295, 114–121 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90099-P
Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H. & Meißner, U.-G. Improved chiral nucleon-nucleon potential up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order. Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 53 (2015).
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15053-8
Drischler, C., Furnstahl, R. J., Melendez, J. A. & Phillips, D. R. How well do we know the neutron-matter equation of state at the densities inside neutron stars? A Bayesian approach with correlated uncertainties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 202702 (2020).
pubmed: 33258658 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.202702
Ekström, A., Hagen, G., Morris, T. D., Papenbrock, T. & Schwartz, P. D. Δ isobars and nuclear saturation. Phys. Rev. C 97, 024332 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024332
Tews, I., Krüger, T., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Neutron matter at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 032504 (2013).
pubmed: 23373917 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.032504
Carbone, A., Cipollone, A., Barbieri, C., Rios, A. & Polls, A. Self-consistent Green’s functions formalism with three-body interactions. Phys. Rev. C 88, 054326 (2013).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.054326
Hagen, G. et al. Coupled-cluster calculations of nucleonic matter. Phys. Rev. C89, 014319 (2014).
Carlson, J. et al. Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1067 (2015).
doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1067
Schmidt, K. E. & Fantoni, S. A quantum Monte Carlo method for nucleon systems. Phys. Lett. B 446, 99–103 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01522-6
Tews, I. Spectrum of shear modes in the neutron-star crust: estimating the nuclear-physics uncertainties. Phys. Rev. C95, 015803 (2017).
Tews, I., Carlson, J., Gandolfi, S. & Reddy, S. Constraining the speed of sound inside neutron stars with chiral effective field theory interactions and observations. Astrophys. J. 860, 149 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac267
Read, J. S., Lackey, B. D., Owen, B. J. & Friedman, J. L. Constraints on a phenomenologically parameterized neutron-star equation of state. Phys. Rev. D79, 124032 (2009).
Hebeler, K., Lattimer, J., Pethick, C. & Schwenk, A. Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation. Astrophys. J. 773, 11 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/11
Annala, E., Gorda, T., Kurkela, A. & Vuorinen, A. Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 172703 (2018).
pubmed: 29756823 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.172703
Tews, I., Margueron, J. & Reddy, S. Critical examination of constraints on the equation of state of dense matter obtained from GW170817. Phys. Rev. C 98, 045804 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.045804
Greif, S., Raaijmakers, G., Hebeler, K., Schwenk, A. & Watts, A. Equation of state sensitivities when inferring neutron star and dense matter properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 5363–5376 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz654
Essick, R., Landry, P. & Holz, D. E. Nonparametric inference of neutron star composition, equation of state, and maximum mass with GW170817. Phys. Rev. D 101, 063007 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063007
McLerran, L. & Reddy, S. Quarkyonic matter and neutron stars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 122701 (2019).
pubmed: 30978062 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.122701
Jeong, K. S., McLerran, L. & Sen, S. Dynamically generated momentum space shell structure of quarkyonic matter via an excluded volume model. Phys. Rev. C 101, 035201 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.035201
Sen, S. & Sivertsen, L. Mass and radius relations of quarkyonic stars using an excluded-volume model. Astrophys. J. 915, 109 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff4c
Margueron, J., Hansen, H., Proust, P. & Chanfray, G. Quarkyonic stars with isospin-flavor asymmetry. Phys. Rev. C 104, 055803 (2021).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.055803
Gandolfi, S., Carlson, J. & Reddy, S. The maximum mass and radius of neutron stars and the nuclear symmetry energy. Phys. Rev. C 85, 032801 (2012).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.032801
Essick, R., Tews, I., Landry, P., Reddy, S. & Holz, D. E. Direct astrophysical tests of chiral effective field theory at supranuclear densities. Phys. Rev. C 102, 055803 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.055803
Wolff, M. T. et al. NICER detection of thermal X-ray pulsations from the massive millisecond pulsars PSR J0740+6620 and PSR J1614–2230. Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L26 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac158e
Miller, M. C. et al. PSR J0030+0451 mass and radius from NICER data and implications for the properties of neutron star matter. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L24 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5
Riley, T. E. et al. A NICER view of PSR J0030+0451: millisecond pulsar parameter estimation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L21 (2019).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c
Miller, M. C. et al. The radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton data. Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b
Riley, T. E. et al. A NICER view of the massive pulsar PSR J0740+6620 informed by radio timing and XMM-newton spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L27 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81
Damour, T. & Nagar, A. Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009).
Hinderer, T., Lackey, B. D., Lang, R. N. & Read, J. S. Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral. Phys. Rev. D81, 123016 (2010).
Abbott, B. P. et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
Abbott, B. P. et al. GW170817: measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018).
pubmed: 30387654 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101
Abbott, B. P. et al. Model comparison from LIGO–Virgo data on GW170817’s binary components and consequences for the merger remnant. Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 045006 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f7c
Carney, M. F., Wade, L. E. & Irwin, B. S. Comparing two models for measuring the neutron star equation of state from gravitational-wave signals. Phys. Rev. D 98, 063004 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063004
Damour, T., Nagar, A. & Villain, L. Measurability of the tidal polarizability of neutron stars in late-inspiral gravitational-wave signals. Phys. Rev. D85, 123007 (2012).
Abdelsalhin, T., Gualtieri, L. & Pani, P. Post-Newtonian spin-tidal couplings for compact binaries. Phys. Rev. D 98, 104046 (2018).
Landry, P. Rotational-tidal phasing of the binary neutron star waveform. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.01882 (2018).
Jiménez Forteza, X., Abdelsalhin, T., Pani, P. & Gualtieri, L. Impact of high-order tidal terms on binary neutron-star waveforms. Phys. Rev. D98, 124014 (2018).
Buonanno, A. & Damour, T. Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics. Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999).
Damour, T. & Nagar, A. Effective one body description of tidal effects in inspiralling compact binaries. Phys. Rev. D81, 084016 (2010).
Hotokezaka, K., Kyutoku, K., Okawa, H. & Shibata, M. Exploring tidal effects of coalescing binary neutron stars in numerical relativity. II. Long-term simulations. Phys. Rev. D91, 064060 (2015).
Hinderer, T. et al. Effects of neutron-star dynamic tides on gravitational waveforms within the effective-one-body approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 181101 (2016).
pubmed: 27203312 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.181101
Akcay, S. et al. Effective-one-body multipolar waveform for tidally interacting binary neutron stars up to merger. Phys. Rev. D99, 044051 (2019).
Bernuzzi, S., Nagar, A., Dietrich, T. & Damour, T. Modeling the dynamics of tidally interacting binary neutron stars up to the merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 161103 (2015).
pubmed: 25955043 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.161103
Dietrich, T. & Hinderer, T. Comprehensive comparison of numerical relativity and effective-one-body results to inform improvements in waveform models for binary neutron star systems. Phys. Rev. D95, 124006 (2017).
Nagar, A. et al. Time-domain effective-one-body gravitational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects. Phys. Rev. D98, 104052 (2018).
Steinhoff, J., Hinderer, T., Dietrich, T. & Foucart, F. Spin effects on neutron star fundamental-mode dynamical tides: phenomenology and comparison to numerical simulations. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033129 (2021).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033129
Kawaguchi, K. et al. Frequency-domain gravitational waveform models for inspiraling binary neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D97, 044044 (2018).
Dietrich, T., Bernuzzi, S. & Tichy, W. Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitational waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations. Phys. Rev. D96, 121501 (2017).
Dietrich, T. et al. Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: tidal and self-spin effects. Phys. Rev. D99, 024029 (2019).
Dietrich, T. et al. Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems. Phys. Rev. D100, 044003 (2019).
Thompson, J. E. et al. Modeling the gravitational wave signature of neutron star black hole coalescences. Phys. Rev. D. 101, 124059 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.124059
LIGO Scientific Collaboration. LIGO Algorithm Library—LALSuite. (2018).
Steinhoff, J., Hinderer, T., Buonanno, A. & Taracchini, A. Dynamical tides in general relativity: effective action and effective-one-body Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016).
Lackey, B. D., Pürrer, M., Taracchini, A. & Marsat, S. Surrogate model for an aligned-spin effective one body waveform model of binary neutron star inspirals using Gaussian process regression. Phys. Rev. D100, 024002 (2019).
Nagar, A. et al. Nonlinear-in-spin effects in effective-one-body waveform models of spin-aligned, inspiralling, neutron star binaries. Phys. Rev. D 99, 044007 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044007
Nagar, A. & Rettegno, P. Efficient effective one body time-domain gravitational waveforms. Phys. Rev. D99, 021501 (2019).
Matas, A. et al. Aligned-spin neutron-star–black-hole waveform model based on the effective-one-body approach and numerical-relativity simulations. Phys. Rev. D 102, 043023 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043023
Veitch, J. et al. Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library. Phys. Rev. D91, 042003 (2015).
Bulla, M. POSSIS: predicting spectra, light curves and polarization for multi-dimensional models of supernovae and kilonovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 5037–5045 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2495
Mazzali, P. A. & Lucy, L. B. The application of Monte Carlo methods to the synthesis of early-time supernovae spectra. Astron. Astrophys. 279, 447 (1993).
Magee, M. R., Sim, S. A., Kotak, R. & Kerzendorf, W. E. Modelling the early time behaviour of type Ia supernovae: effects of the
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832675
Tanaka, M., Kato, D., Gaigalas, G. & Kawaguchi, K. Systematic opacity calculations for kilonovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, 1369–1392 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1576
Bulla, M., Sim, S. A. & Kromer, M. Polarization spectral synthesis for Type Ia supernova explosion models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 967–981 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv657
Barbary, K. et al. Sncosmo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6363879 (2022).
Coughlin, M. et al. Toward rapid transient identification and characterization of kilonovae. Astrophys. J. 849, 12 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9114
Sari, R., Piran, T. & Narayan, R. Spectra and light curves of gamma-ray burst afterglows. Astrophys. J. Lett. 497, L17 (1998).
doi: 10.1086/311269
Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T. & Schramm, D. N. Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and gamma-rays from coalescing neutron stars. Nature 340, 126–128 (1989).
doi: 10.1038/340126a0
Paczynski, B. Cosmological gamma-ray bursts. Acta Astron. 41, 257–267 (1991).
Meszaros, P. & Rees, M. J. Tidal heating and mass loss in neutron star binaries—implications for gamma-ray burst models. Astrophys. J. 397, 570–575 (1992).
doi: 10.1086/171813
Narayan, R., Paczynski, B. & Piran, T. Gamma-ray bursts as the death throes of massive binary stars. Astrophys. J. 395, L83–L86 (1992).
doi: 10.1086/186493
van Eerten, H., Leventis, K., Meliani, Z., Wijers, R. & Keppens, R. Gamma-ray burst afterglows from trans-relativistic blast wave simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 403, 300 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16109.x
Granot, J. & Piran, T. On the lateral expansion of gamma-ray burst jets. Mont. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 570–587 (2012).
Krüger, C. J. & Foucart, F. Estimates for disk and ejecta masses produced in compact binary mergers. Phys. Rev. D 101, 103002 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103002
Dietrich, T. & Ujevic, M. Modeling dynamical ejecta from binary neutron star mergers and implications for electromagnetic counterparts. Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 105014 (2017).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/aa6bb0
Nedora, V. et al. Mapping dynamical ejecta and disk masses from numerical relativity simulations of neutron star mergers. Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 015008 (2022).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac35a8
Agathos, M. et al. Inferring prompt Black-Hole formation in neutron star mergers from gravitational-wave data. Phys. Rev. D 101, 044006 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044006
Vallisneri, M., Kanner, J., Williams, R., Weinstein, A. & Stephens, B. The LIGO Open Science Center. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 610, 012021 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/610/1/012021
Raaijmakers, G. et al. Constraints on the dense matter equation of state and neutron star properties from NICER’s mass–radius estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and multimessenger observations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L29 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac089a
Tews, I., Margueron, J. & Reddy, S. Critical examination of constraints on the equation of state of dense matter obtained from GW170817. Phys. Rev. C98, 045804 (2018).

Auteurs

Peter T H Pang (PTH)

Nikhef, Science Park 105, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute for Gravitational and Subatomic Physics (GRASP), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Tim Dietrich (T)

Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. tim.dietrich@uni-potsdam.de.
Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. tim.dietrich@uni-potsdam.de.

Michael W Coughlin (MW)

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Mattia Bulla (M)

The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Physics and Earth Science, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, I-44122, Ferrara, Italy.
INFN, Sezione di Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, I-44122, Ferrara, Italy.
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico d'Abruzzo, Via Mentore Maggini snc, 64100, Teramo, Italy.

Ingo Tews (I)

Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.

Mouza Almualla (M)

Department of Physics, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE.

Tyler Barna (T)

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Ramodgwendé Weizmann Kiendrebeogo (RW)

Laboratoire de Physique et de Chimie de l'Environnement, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, 96 Boulevard de l'Observatoire, F06304, Nice Cedex 4, France.

Nina Kunert (N)

Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

Gargi Mansingh (G)

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Department of Physics, American University, Washington, DC, 20016, USA.

Brandon Reed (B)

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, MN, 55812, USA.

Niharika Sravan (N)

Department of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Andrew Toivonen (A)

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Sarah Antier (S)

Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, 96 Boulevard de l'Observatoire, F06304, Nice Cedex 4, France.

Robert O VandenBerg (RO)

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Jack Heinzel (J)

Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Vsevolod Nedora (V)

Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

Pouyan Salehi (P)

Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

Ritwik Sharma (R)

Department of Physics, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Rahul Somasundaram (R)

Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA.

Chris Van Den Broeck (C)

Nikhef, Science Park 105, 1098 XG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute for Gravitational and Subatomic Physics (GRASP), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH