Rapid spatial assessment of leaf-absorbed irradiance.
absorbed irradiance
canopy
energy balance
high-throughput phenotyping
thermal imaging
Journal
The New phytologist
ISSN: 1469-8137
Titre abrégé: New Phytol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9882884
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Dec 2023
20 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
31
05
2023
accepted:
02
12
2023
medline:
21
12
2023
pubmed:
21
12
2023
entrez:
21
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Image-based high-throughput phenotyping promises the rapid determination of functional traits in large plant populations. However, interpretation of some traits - such as those related to photosynthesis or transpiration rates - is only meaningful if the irradiance absorbed by the measured leaves is known, which can differ greatly between different parts of the same plant and within canopies. No feasible method currently exists to rapidly measure absorbed irradiance in three-dimensional plants and canopies. We developed a method and protocols to derive absorbed irradiance at any visible part of a canopy with a thermal camera, by fitting a leaf energy balance model to transient changes in leaf temperature. Leaves were exposed to short light pulses (30 s) that were not long enough to trigger stomatal opening but strong enough to induce transient changes in leaf temperature that was proportional to the absorbed irradiance. The method was successfully validated against point measurements of absorbed irradiance in plant species with relatively simple architecture (sweet pepper, cucumber, tomato, and lettuce). Once calibrated, the model was used to produce absorbed irradiance maps from thermograms. Our method opens new avenues for the interpretation of plant responses derived from imaging techniques and can be adapted to existing high-throughput phenotyping platforms.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : China Scholarship Council
ID : 202006300044
Organisme : NWO
ID : 19652
Organisme : Sector Plan Engineering
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2023 New Phytologist Foundation.
Références
Araus JL, Kefauver SC, Zaman-Allah M, Olsen MS, Cairns JE. 2018. Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain. Trends in Plant Science 23: 451-466.
Bai Z, Mao S, Han Y, Feng L, Wang G, Yang B, Zhi X, Fan Z, Lei Y, Du W et al. 2016. Study on light interception and biomass production of different cotton cultivars. PLoS ONE 11: e0156335.
Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD, Lee D, Goodrich B, Betancourt M, Brubaker MA, Guo J, Li P, Riddell A. 2017. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software 76: 1.
Chen Y, Ren K, He X, Gong J, Hu X, Su J, Jin Y, Zhao Z, Zhu Y, Zou C. 2019. Dynamic changes in physiological and biochemical properties of flue-cured tobacco of different leaf ages during flue-curing and their effects on yield and quality. BMC Plant Biology 19: 1-21.
Costa JM, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Leonhardt N, Ksas B, Reiter IM, Pantin F, Genty B. 2015. Open all night long: the dark side of stomatal control. Plant Physiology 167: 289-294.
Dodd AN, Parkinson K, Webb AAR. 2004. Independent circadian regulation of assimilation and stomatal conductance in the ztl-1 mutant of Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 162: 63-70.
Du J, Lu X, Fan J, Qin Y, Yang X, Guo X. 2020. Image-based high-throughput detection and phenotype evaluation method for multiple lettuce varieties. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 1-15.
Evans JR, Poorter H. 2001. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 755-767.
Fila G, Sartorato I. 2011. Using leaf mass per area as predictor of light interception and absorption in crop/weed monoculture or mixed stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151: 575-584.
Fischer RA, Rebetzke GJ. 2018. Indirect selection for potential yield in early-generation, spaced plantings of wheat and other small-grain cereals: a review. Crop and Pasture Science, 69: 439.
Flood PJ, Kruijer W, Schnabel SK, Schoor R, Jalink H, Snel JFH, Harbinson J, Aarts MGM. 2016. Phenomics for photosynthesis, growth and reflectance in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals circadian and long-term fluctuations in heritability. Plant Methods 12: 1-14.
Fu D, Liu M, Yang D, Che H, Xia X. 2022. Influences of atmospheric reanalysis on the accuracy of clear-sky irradiance estimates: comparing MERRA-2 and CAMS. Atmospheric Environment 277: 119080.
Furbank RT, Tester M. 2011. Phenomics - technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science 16: 635-644.
Higashide T, Heuvelink E. 2009. Physiological and morphological changes over the past 50 years in yield components in tomato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 134: 460-465.
Hõrak H, Fountain L, Dunn JA, Landymore J, Gray JE. 2021. Dynamic thermal imaging confirms local but not fast systemic ABA responses. Plant, Cell & Environment 44: 885-899.
Jones HG. 2013. Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kaiser E, Kromdijk J, Harbinson J, Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM. 2017. Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance. Annals of Botany 119: 191-205.
Kiniry J, Johnson MV, Mitchell R, Vogel K, Kaiser J, Bruckerhoff S, Cordsiemon R. 2011. Switchgrass leaf area index and light extinction coefficients. Agronomy Journal 103: 119-122.
Langstroff A, Heuermann MC, Stahl A, Junker A. 2022. Opportunities and limits of controlled-environment plant phenotyping for climate response traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135: 1-16.
Lanoue J, Leonardos ED, Grodzinski B. 2018. Effects of light quality and intensity on diurnal patterns and rates of photo-assimilate translocation and transpiration in tomato leaves. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1-14.
Loveday J, Loveday G, Byrne J, Ong B, Newman P. 2017. Quantifying radiation from thermal imaging of residential landscape elements. Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability 2: 17.
McAusland L, Atkinson JA, Lawson T, Murchie EH. 2019. High throughput procedure utilising chlorophyll fluorescence imaging to phenotype dynamic photosynthesis and photoprotection in leaves under controlled gaseous conditions. Plant Methods 15: 1-15.
McAusland L, Davey PA, Kanwal N, Baker NR, Lawson T. 2013. A novel system for spatial and temporal imaging of intrinsic plant water use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 4993-5007.
McAusland L, Vialet-Chabrand S, Davey P, Baker NR, Brendel O, Lawson T. 2016. Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water-use efficiency. New Phytologist 211: 1209-1220.
Monteith J, Unsworth M. 2013. Principles of environmental physics: plants, animals, and the atmosphere, 4th edn. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press.
Olbrycht R, Więcek B. 2015. New approach to thermal drift correction in microbolometer thermal cameras. Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal 12: 184-195.
Pieruschka R, Schurr U. 2019. Plant phenotyping: past, present, and future. Plant Phenomics 2019: 7507131.
Pridgeon AJ, Hetherington AM. 2021. ABA signalling and metabolism are not essential for dark-induced stomatal closure but affect response speed. Scientific Reports 11: 1-12.
Tardieu F, Cabrera-Bosquet L, Pridmore T, Bennett M. 2017. Plant phenomics, from sensors to knowledge. Current Biology 27: R770-R783.
Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tazoe Y, Vyas P, Yano S. 2006. Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 343-354.
Vialet-Chabrand S, Lawson T. 2019. Dynamic leaf energy balance: deriving stomatal conductance from thermal imaging in a dynamic environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 70: 2839-2855.
Vialet-Chabrand S, Lawson T. 2020. Thermography methods to assess stomatal behaviour in a dynamic environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 71: 2329-2338.
Vico G, Manzoni S, Palmroth S, Katul G. 2011. Effects of stomatal delays on the economics of leaf gas exchange under intermittent light regimes. New Phytologist 192: 640-652.
Virlet N, Sabermanesh K, Sadeghi-Tehran P, Hawkesford MJ. 2017. Field scanalyzer: an automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring. Functional Plant Biology 44: 143-153.
Wassenaar MLJ, van Ieperen W, Driever SM. 2022. Low red to far-red ratio increases resistance to CO2 diffusion and reduces photosynthetic efficiency in low light grown tomato plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 200: 104918.
Yang W, Feng H, Zhang X, Zhang J, Doonan JH, Batchelor WD, Xiong L, Yan J. 2020. Crop phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: past decades, current challenges, and future perspectives. Molecular Plant 13: 187-214.
Zhang N, Berman SR, Joubert D, Vialet-Chabrand S, Marcelis LFM, Kaiser E. 2022. Variation of photosynthetic induction in major horticultural crops is mostly driven by differences in stomatal traits. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1-19.
Zhi X, Han Y, Mao S, Wang G, Feng L, Yang B, Fan Z, Du W, Lu J, Li Y. 2014. Light spatial distribution in the canopy and crop development in cotton. PLoS ONE 9: 1-10.