Ridge preservation using a self-retaining block type bone substitute for extraction sockets with buccal dehiscence defects - A preclinical study.
alveolar ridge augmentation
bone regeneration
bone remodeling
bone substitute
tooth socket
Journal
Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
revised:
30
11
2023
received:
11
07
2023
accepted:
08
12
2023
medline:
12
3
2024
pubmed:
21
12
2023
entrez:
21
12
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the effect of a self-retaining block-type bone substitute (srBB) on the dimensional stability of the horizontal ridge width at the coronal level in a buccal dehiscence model. Four box-shaped bone defects with a buccal dehiscence were surgically prepared in the partially edentulous mandible (n = 6). Experimental biomaterials were randomly assigned to each site: (1) Control group: no treatment, (2) particle-type bone substitute (PBS) group, (3) collagenated soft block bone substitute (csBB) group, and (4) self-retaining synthetic block bone (srBB) group. In all grafted groups, a collagen membrane covered the biomaterials. At 16 weeks, clinical, histological, and radiographic analyses were performed. Three of the six blocks in the srBB group became exposed and fell out during the first week after surgery. Therefore, the remaining three specimens were renamed RsrBB group. The RsrBB group showed an increase horizontal ridge compared to the pristine bone width at 2-4 mm below the CEJ, while the other groups showed resorption (augmented width at 2 mm below: 4.2, 42.4, 36.2, and 110.1% in the control, PBS, csBB, and RsrBB groups, respectively). The mineralized bone area was largest in the RsrBB group (4.74, 3.44, 5.67, and 7.77 mm The srBB group demonstrated the highest volume stability at the coronal level. These findings would potentially suggest that self-retaining block bone substitute might be a good candidate for alveolar ridge preservation.
Substances chimiques
Bone Substitutes
0
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
330-339Subventions
Organisme : Yonsei University College of Dentistry
Informations de copyright
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Araujo, M. G., Liljenberg, B., & Lindhe, J. (2010). Dynamics of bio-Oss® collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: An experimental study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 21(1), 55-64.
Araújo, M. G., & Lindhe, J. (2005). Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32(2), 212-218.
Araújo, M. G., Sukekava, F., Wennström, J. L., & Lindhe, J. (2005). Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32(6), 645-652.
Avila-Ortiz, G., Chambrone, L., & Vignoletti, F. (2019). Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46, 195-223.
Barone, A., Ricci, M., Tonelli, P., Santini, S., & Covani, U. (2013). Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: A comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(11), 1231-1237.
Benic, G. I., Bienz, S. P., Song, Y. W., Cha, J. K., Hämmerle, C. H., Jung, U. W., & Jung, R. E. (2022). Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 49(5), 480-495.
Benic, G. I., Eisner, B. M., Jung, R. E., Basler, T., Schneider, D., & Hämmerle, C. H. (2019). Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes: 6-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(10), 1016-1026.
Benic, G. I., & Hämmerle, C. H. (2014). Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontology 2000, 66(1), 13-40.
Benic, G. I., Joo, M. J., Yoon, S. R., Cha, J. K., & Jung, U. W. (2017). Primary ridge augmentation with collagenated xenogenic block bone substitute in combination with collagen membrane and rh BMP-2: A pilot histological investigation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(12), 1543-1552.
Benic, G. I., Thoma, D. S., Jung, R. E., Sanz-Martin, I., Unger, S., Cantalapiedra, A., & Hämmerle, C. H. (2017). Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: A pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(11), e262-e270.
Caneva, M., Botticelli, D., Carneiro Martins, E. N., Caneva, M., Lang, N. P., & Xavier, S. P. (2017). Healing at the interface between recipient sites and autologous block bone grafts affixed by either position or lag screw methods: A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(12), 1484-1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13016
Cardaropoli, G., Araujo, M., & Lindhe, J. (2003). Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites: An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 30(9), 809-818.
Cha, J. K., Song, Y. W., Park, S. H., Jung, R. E., Jung, U. W., & Thoma, D. S. (2019). Alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior maxilla reduces vertical dimensional change: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(6), 515-523.
Choi, H. K., Cho, H. Y., Lee, S. J., Cho, I. W., Shin, H. S., Koo, K. T., Lim, H.-C., & Park, J. C. (2017). Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 47(6), 372-380. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.372
De Risi, V., Clementini, M., Vittorini, G., Mannocci, A., & De Sanctis, M. (2015). Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(1), 50-68.
Ikawa, T., Akizuki, T., Matsuura, T., Hoshi, S., Ammar, S. A., Kinoshita, A., Oda, S., & Izumi, Y. (2016). Ridge preservation after tooth extraction with buccal bone plate deficiency using tunnel structured β-tricalcium phosphate blocks: A 2-month histologic pilot study in beagle dogs. Journal of Periodontology, 87(2), 175-183.
Koo, T. H., Song, Y. W., Cha, J. K., Jung, U. W., Kim, C. S., & Lee, J. S. (2020). Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(1), 93-102.
Lee, J. S., Jung, J. S., Im, G. I., Kim, B. S., Cho, K. S., & Kim, C. S. (2015). Ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using rh BMP-2: An experimental study in canine. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 42(7), 678-687.
MacBeth, N., Trullenque-Eriksson, A., Donos, N., & Mardas, N. (2017). Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(8), 982-1004.
Milinkovic, I., & Cordaro, L. (2014). Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 43(5), 606-625.
Mir-Mari, J., Wui, H., Jung, R. E., Hämmerle, C. H., & Benic, G. I. (2016). Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: An in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27(2), 258-265.
Paeng, K. W., Cha, J. K., Thoma, D. S., Jung, R. E., Jung, U. W., & Benic, G. I. (2022). Effect of collagen membrane and of bone substitute on lateral bone augmentation with titanium mesh: An experimental in vivo study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33(4), 413-423.
Park, J.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., Park, S., Cha, J.-K., Lee, J.-S., & Jung, U.-W. (2023). Synchrotron analysis of damaged extraction sockets augmented using a synthetic bone block: A pilot study. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6468
Precheur, H. V. (2007). Bone graft materials. Dental Clinics of North America, 51(3), 729-746.
Raghoebar, G. M., Liem, R. S., Bos, R. R., van der Wal, J. E., & Vissink, A. (2006). Resorbable screws for fixation of autologous bone grafts. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17(3), 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01200.x
Roccuzzo, M., Ramieri, G., Bunino, M., & Berrone, S. (2007). Autogenous bone graft alone or associated with titanium mesh for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation: A controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 18(3), 286-294.
Schwarz, F., Rothamel, D., Herten, M., Ferrari, D., Sager, M., & Becker, J. (2008). Lateral ridge augmentation using particulated or block bone substitutes biocoated with rhGDF-5 and rhBMP-2: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19(7), 642-652.
Silva, E. R., Chaushu, L., Balan, V. F., Botticelli, D., & Xavier, S. P. (2022). Fixation screw minimizes bone graft loss following autogenous lateral block graft augmentation: An experimental in vivo study. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 123(4), 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.09.003
Song, Y. W., Rafikov, K., Paeng, K. W., Kim, M. J., Cha, J. K., Thoma, D. S., Jung, R. E., & Jung, U. W. (2020). Dimensional changes of the maxillary sinus augmented with a collagenated synthetic bone block or synthetic bone particulates: A pre-clinical study in rabbits. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(11), 1416-1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13363
Thoma, D. S., Bienz, S. P., Payer, M., Hüsler, J., Schmidlin, P. R., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Jakse, N., & Jung, R. E. (2019). Randomized clinical study using xenograft blocks loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2 or autogenous bone blocks for ridge augmentation - a three-dimensional analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(9), 872-881. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13492
Thoma, D. S., Naenni, N., Benic, G. I., Hämmerle, C. H., & Jung, R. E. (2017). Soft tissue volume augmentation at dental implant sites using a volume stable three-dimensional collagen matrix-histological outcomes of a preclinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44(2), 185-194.
Thoma, D. S., Payer, M., Jakse, N., Bienz, S. P., Hüsler, J., Schmidlin, P. R., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Jung, R. E. (2018). Randomized, controlled clinical two-Centre study using xenogeneic block grafts loaded with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 or autogenous bone blocks for lateral ridge augmentation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(2), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12841
Tien, H. K., Lee, W. H., Kim, C. S., Choi, S. H., Gruber, R., & Lee, J. S. (2021). Alveolar ridge regeneration in two-wall-damaged extraction sockets of an in vivo experimental model. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(8), 971-979.
Trombelli, L., Heitz-Mayfield, L. J., Needleman, I., Moles, D., & Scabbia, A. (2002). A systematic review of graft materials and biological agents for periodontal intraosseous defects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 29, 117-135.
Wang, H.-L., & Boyapati, L. (2006). “PASS” principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dentistry, 15(1), 8-17.