Intrarectal injections of botulinum toxin versus placebo for the treatment of urge faecal incontinence in adults (FI-Toxin): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 study.


Journal

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 2468-1253
Titre abrégé: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101690683

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 09 09 2023
revised: 25 09 2023
accepted: 27 09 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 21 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Non-randomised studies assessing intrarectal botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injections for faecal incontinence are promising. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BoNTA for the treatment of faecal incontinence in a randomised study. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we included adult patients who had at least one urgency or faecal incontinence episode per week for at least 3 months and who had experienced a failure of conservative or surgical treatment from eight French specialist hospital units with the skills to manage patients with faecal incontinence. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central web form to receive intrarectal submucosal injections of either 200 units of BoNTA (Botox; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA; BoNTA group) or an equivalent volume of saline (placebo group), stratified by Cleveland Clinic Severity scores (CCS score; ≥12 or <12). Patients, investigators, study site staff, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment allocation up to the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was the number of episodes of faecal incontinence and urgency per day assessed using 21-day patient bowel diaries 3 months after the treatment. The primary analysis was performed using a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach (ie, in all the randomised patients who had received a treatment) with adjustment for baseline faecal incontinence and urgency episodes. After the final data collection at 6 months after injections, patients were unmasked and offered the BoNTA treatment if they were in the placebo group (rescue therapy) without masking, with an additional 6 months of safety follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02414425. Between Nov 25, 2015, and Nov 25, 2020, we randomly assigned 200 patients to receive either BoNTA (n=100) or placebo (n=100) injections. Due to withdrawals before the injections, 96 patients were included in the BoNTA group and 95 patients were included in the placebo group (mITT analysis). The mean number of faecal incontinence and urgency episodes per day in the BoNTA group decreased from 1·9 (SD 2·2) at baseline to 0·8 (1·8) at 3 months after the injections, and from 1·4 (1·1) to 1·0 (1·0) in the placebo group, with a baseline-adjusted mean group difference at 3 months estimated at -0·51 (95% CI -0·80 to -0·21, p=0·0008). No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in the trial. The most frequently reported non-serious adverse event (treatment related or not) following the BoNTA or placebo injections was constipation (reported in 68 [40%] of 169 patients who received the BoNTA injections and 38 [40%] of 95 patients who received placebo injections). BoNTA injections are an efficacious treatment for urge faecal incontinence. Further research will define the optimum selection criteria, dose, site of injection, re-injection frequency, and long-term results. General Direction of Healthcare (French Ministry of Health).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Non-randomised studies assessing intrarectal botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injections for faecal incontinence are promising. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BoNTA for the treatment of faecal incontinence in a randomised study.
METHODS METHODS
In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we included adult patients who had at least one urgency or faecal incontinence episode per week for at least 3 months and who had experienced a failure of conservative or surgical treatment from eight French specialist hospital units with the skills to manage patients with faecal incontinence. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central web form to receive intrarectal submucosal injections of either 200 units of BoNTA (Botox; Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA; BoNTA group) or an equivalent volume of saline (placebo group), stratified by Cleveland Clinic Severity scores (CCS score; ≥12 or <12). Patients, investigators, study site staff, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment allocation up to the 6-month visit. The primary endpoint was the number of episodes of faecal incontinence and urgency per day assessed using 21-day patient bowel diaries 3 months after the treatment. The primary analysis was performed using a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach (ie, in all the randomised patients who had received a treatment) with adjustment for baseline faecal incontinence and urgency episodes. After the final data collection at 6 months after injections, patients were unmasked and offered the BoNTA treatment if they were in the placebo group (rescue therapy) without masking, with an additional 6 months of safety follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02414425.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Between Nov 25, 2015, and Nov 25, 2020, we randomly assigned 200 patients to receive either BoNTA (n=100) or placebo (n=100) injections. Due to withdrawals before the injections, 96 patients were included in the BoNTA group and 95 patients were included in the placebo group (mITT analysis). The mean number of faecal incontinence and urgency episodes per day in the BoNTA group decreased from 1·9 (SD 2·2) at baseline to 0·8 (1·8) at 3 months after the injections, and from 1·4 (1·1) to 1·0 (1·0) in the placebo group, with a baseline-adjusted mean group difference at 3 months estimated at -0·51 (95% CI -0·80 to -0·21, p=0·0008). No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in the trial. The most frequently reported non-serious adverse event (treatment related or not) following the BoNTA or placebo injections was constipation (reported in 68 [40%] of 169 patients who received the BoNTA injections and 38 [40%] of 95 patients who received placebo injections).
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
BoNTA injections are an efficacious treatment for urge faecal incontinence. Further research will define the optimum selection criteria, dose, site of injection, re-injection frequency, and long-term results.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
General Direction of Healthcare (French Ministry of Health).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38128556
pii: S2468-1253(23)00332-1
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00332-1
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02414425']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests A-ML is a consultant for Medtronic. FZ is a consultant for Coloplast. LS has received grants from Takeda, Janssen, and AbbVie, is a consultant for Takeda, and has received grants for educational support from Takeda, Janssen, and AbbVie. GA receives support for learning sessions from Wellspect, honoraria for presentations from Laborie, Coloplast, and Convatec, and support for meetings with Coloplast and IPSEN, and sits on the advisory boards of Coloplast, Convatec, and IBSA. FM lectures for Laborie, Medtronic, and Dr Falk; his spouse is employed by MSD. IE lectures for Takeda, MSD, and Viva Healthcare. AG gives paid statistical courses to Gleamer (medical imaging enterprise). GG is a consultant for Kyowa Kirin, Enterra Medical, and Naturex; gives lectures for Lilly, Medtronic, Laborie, Kyowa Kirin, Enterra Medical, and Coloplast; and has a contract from Dr Falk. MQ, VV, HD, VB, JP, CB, and EL declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Anne-Marie Leroi (AM)

Université de Rouen Normandie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), ADEN UMR1073, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rouen, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CIC-CRB) 1404, Department of Digestive Physiology, Rouen, France. Electronic address: anne-marie.leroi@chu-rouen.fr.

Michel Queralto (M)

Colproctology Unit, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France.

Frank Zerbib (F)

CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Levêque, Department of Gastroenterology, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France.

Laurent Siproudhis (L)

Department of Gastroenterology, Inphy CIC1414, CHU Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France.

Véronique Vitton (V)

Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, France.

Gérard Amarenco (G)

Sorbonne Université, Groupe de Recherche Clinique (GRC) 001, GREEN GRC en Neuro-Urologie, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.

Isabelle Etienney (I)

Department of Coloproctology, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France.

Francois Mion (F)

Université de Lyon, Department of Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.

Valerie Bridoux (V)

Université de Rouen Normandie, INSERM, ADEN UMR1073, CHU Rouen, Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen, France.

Julie Philip (J)

Colproctology Unit, Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France.

Charlène Brochard (C)

Diseases of the Digestive Tract Department, Functional Digestive Explorations Division, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Pontchaillou, CIC1414, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France; INSERM U1235, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.

Henri Damon (H)

Université de Lyon, Department of Digestive Physiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.

Elie Lacroix (E)

Department of Biostatistics, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.

André Gillibert (A)

Department of Biostatistics, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France.

Guillaume Gourcerol (G)

Université de Rouen Normandie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), ADEN UMR1073, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Rouen, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CIC-CRB) 1404, Department of Digestive Physiology, Rouen, France.

Classifications MeSH