Local versus General Anaesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomised and Propensity-Score Matched Studies.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation general anaesthesia local anaesthesia transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Journal

Current problems in cardiology
ISSN: 1535-6280
Titre abrégé: Curr Probl Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7701802

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 18 12 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 21 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a common practice for severe aortic stenosis, but the choice between general (GA) and local anesthesia (LA) remains uncertain. We conducted a comprehensive literature review until April 2023, comparing the safety and efficacy of LA versus GA in TAVI procedures. Our findings indicate significant advantages of LA, including lower 30-day mortality rates (RR: 0.69; 95% CI [0.58, 0.82]; p < 0.001), shorter in-hospital stays (mean difference: -0.91 days; 95% CI [-1.63, -0.20]; p = 0.01), reduced bleeding/transfusion incidents (RR: 0.64; 95% CI [0.48, 0.85]; p < 0.01), and fewer respiratory complications (RR: 0.56; 95% CI [0.42, 0.76], p<0.01). Other operative outcomes were comparable. Our findings reinforce prior evidence, presenting a compelling case for LA's safety and efficacy. While patient preferences and clinical nuances must be considered, our study propels the discourse towards a more informed anaesthesia approach for TAVI procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38128636
pii: S0146-2806(23)00777-6
doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102360
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102360

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Mona Jaffar-Karballai (M)

Department of Medicine, St George's University of London, London, UK.

Mohammed Al-Tawil (M)

Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Sakshi Roy (S)

School of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

Fatima Kayali (F)

University Hospitals Sussex, Sussex, UK.

Maariyah Vankad (M)

University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Ahmed Shazly (A)

Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon University Hospital, Basildon, UK.

Mohamed Zeinah (M)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Amer Harky (A)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK; Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: aaharky@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH