Temperature rise in photopolymerized adhesively-bonded resin composite: A thermography study.
AFCT
Bonding agent
Bulk-fill resin composites
Dentin
High-irradiance
RAFT
Resin composite
Thermal imaging
Thermographic analysis
URPBF
Universal adhesive
Journal
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
ISSN: 1879-0097
Titre abrégé: Dent Mater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
15
10
2023
revised:
10
12
2023
accepted:
10
12
2023
medline:
18
3
2024
pubmed:
22
12
2023
entrez:
21
12
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess visually and quantitatively the contributions of the adhesive layer photopolymerization and the subsequent resin composite increment to spatio-temporal maps of temperature at five different cavity locations, subjected to two irradiance curing protocols: standard and ultra-high. Caries-free molars were used to obtain 40, 2 mm thick dentin slices, randomly assigned to groups (n = 5). These slices were incorporated within 3D-printed model cavites, 4 mm deep, restored with Adhese® Universal bonding agent and 2 mm thick Tetric® Powerfill resin composite, and photocured sequentially, as follows: G1: control-empty cavity; G2: adhesive layer; G3 composite layer with no adhesive; and G4 composite layer with adhesive. The main four groups were subdivided based on two curing protocols, exposed either to standard 10 s (1.2 W/cm Two-way ANOVA showed that there was no significant interaction between light-curing time and location on the measured parameters (p > 0.05), except for the time-to-reach-maximum-temperature (p < 0.05). Curing the adhesive layer alone with the 10 s protocol resulted in a significantly increased pulpal roof temperature compared to 3 s cure (p < 0.05). Independent T-tests between G3 and G4, between 3 s and 10 s, confirmed that the adhesive agent caused no significant increases (p > 0.05) on the measured parameters. The ultra-high light-curing protocol significantly increased ΔT in composite compared to 10 s curing (p < 0.05). When the adhesive layer was photocured alone in a cavity, with a 2 mm thick dentin floor, the exothermal release of energy resulted in higher temperatures with a 10 s curing protocol, compared to a 3 s high irradiance. But when subsequently photocuring a 2 mm layer of composite, the resultant temperatures generated at pulpal roof location from the two curing protocols were similar and therefore there was no increased hazard to the dental pulp from the immediately prior adhesive photopolymerization, cured via the ultra-high irradiation protocol.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38129192
pii: S0109-5641(23)00490-6
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Cements
0
Composite Resins
0
Resin Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
458-465Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The Authors declare no conflict of interest.