Parental perspectives on a trial using waived informed consent at birth.
Journal
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
ISSN: 1476-5543
Titre abrégé: J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501884
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Dec 2023
21 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
24
10
2023
accepted:
07
12
2023
revised:
24
11
2023
medline:
22
12
2023
pubmed:
22
12
2023
entrez:
22
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To determine parental perspectives in a trial with waived consent. Anonymous survey of birth parents with term infants who were randomized using a waiver of consent, administered after infant discharge. 121 (11%) survey responses were collected. Of the 121 responding parents 111 (92%) reported that this form of consent was acceptable and 116 (96%) reported feeling comfortable having another child participate in a similar study. 110 (91%) respondents reported that they both understood the information provided in the consent process and had enough time to consider participation. Four percent had a negative opinion on the study's effect on their child's health. Most responding parents reported both acceptability of this study design in the neonatal period and that the study had a positive effect on their child's health. Future work should investigate additional ways to involve parents and elicit feedback on varied methods of pediatric consent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38129598
doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01853-8
pii: 10.1038/s41372-023-01853-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
ID : R01HD096023
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Références
Katheria A, Schmölzer GM, Janvier A, Kapadia V, Saugstad OD, Vento M, et al. A narrative review of the rationale for conducting neonatal emergency studies with a waived or deferred consent approach. Neonatology. 2023;120:344–52.
doi: 10.1159/000530257
pubmed: 37231967
Rich WD, Auten KJ, Gantz MG, Hale EC, Hensman AM, Newman NS, et al. Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e215–21.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3353
pubmed: 20587676
Katheria A, Reister F, Essers J, Mendler M, Hummler H, Subramaniam A, et al. Association of umbilical cord milking vs delayed umbilical cord clamping with death or severe intraventricular hemorrhage among preterm infants. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2019;322:1877–86.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16004
Katheria AC, Allman P, Szychowski JM, Essers J, Carlo WA, Schmölzer GM, et al. Perinatal outcomes of subjects enrolled in a multicenter trial with a waiver of antenatal consent. Am J Perinatol. 2022;39:904–8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1719184
pubmed: 33142340
Arnup SJ, McKenzie JE, Hemming K, Pilcher D, Forbes AB. Understanding the cluster randomised crossover design: a graphical illustration of the components of variation and a sample size tutorial. Trials. 2017;18:381.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2113-2
pubmed: 28810895
pmcid: 5557529
Katheria AC, Clark E, Yoder B, Schmölzer GM, Yan Law BH, El-Naggar W, et al. Umbilical cord milking in nonvigorous infants: a cluster-randomized crossover trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:217.e211–7.e214.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.015
Bjorland PA, Øymar K, Ersdal HL, Rettedal SI. Incidence of newborn resuscitative interventions at birth and short-term outcomes: a regional population-based study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3:e000592.
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000592
pubmed: 31909225
pmcid: 6936999
Schreiner MS, Feltman D, Wiswell T, Wootton S, Arnold C, Tyson J, et al. When is a waiver of consent appropriate in a neonatal clinical trial? Pediatrics. 2014;134:1006–12.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0207
pubmed: 25287456
pmcid: 4533281
O’Shea N, Doran K, Ryan CA, Dempsey EM. Parental and clinician views of consent in neonatal research. Ir Med J. 2018;111:706.
pubmed: 30376224
Burgess E, Singhal N, Amin H, McMillan DD, Devrome H. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88:F280–285.
doi: 10.1136/fn.88.4.F280
pubmed: 12819158
pmcid: 1721584
Harron K, Woolfall K, Dwan K, Gamble C, Mok Q, Ramnarayan P, et al. Deferred consent for randomized controlled trials in emergency care settings. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e1316–22.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0512
pubmed: 26438711
Ross CE, Lehmann S, Hayes MM, Yamin JB, Berg RA, Kleinman ME, et al. Community consultation in the pediatric intensive care unit for an exception from informed consent Trial: A survey of patient caregivers. Resusc. Plus. 2023;13:100355.
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100355
pubmed: 36686322
pmcid: 9852782
Rich WD, Katheria AC. Waiver of consent in a trial intervention occurring at birth—how do parents feel? Front Pediatr. 2017;5:56.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00056
pubmed: 28377915
pmcid: 5359472
Weiss EM, Olszewski AE, Guttmann KF, Magnus BE, Li S, Shah AR, et al. Parental factors associated with the decision to participate in a neonatal clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2032106.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32106
pubmed: 33433595
pmcid: 7804922