Pre-sleep protein supplementation does not improve recovery from load carriage in British Army recruits (part 2).

amino acids military muscle damage nutrition repair

Journal

Frontiers in nutrition
ISSN: 2296-861X
Titre abrégé: Front Nutr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101642264

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 20 07 2023
accepted: 13 11 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

British Army basic training (BT) is physically demanding with new recruits completing multiple bouts of physical activity each day with limited recovery. Load carriage is one of the most physically demanding BT activities and has been shown to induce acute exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) and impair muscle function. Protein supplementation can accelerate muscle recovery by attenuating EIMD and muscle function loss. This study investigated the impact of an additional daily bolus of protein prior to sleep throughout training on acute muscle recovery following a load carriage test in British Army recruits. Ninety nine men and 23 women (mean ± SD: age: 21.3 ± 3.5 yrs., height: 174.8 ± 8.4 cm, body mass 75.4 ± 12.2 kg) were randomized to dietary control (CON), carbohydrate placebo (PLA), moderate (20 g; MOD) or high (60 g; HIGH) protein supplementation. Muscle function (maximal jump height), perceived muscle soreness and urinary markers of muscle damage were assessed before (PRE), immediately post (POST), 24-h post (24 h-POST) and 40-h post (40 h-POST) a load carriage test. There was no impact of supplementation on muscle function at POST (

Identifiants

pubmed: 38130446
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1264042
pmc: PMC10733965
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1264042

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Chapman, Roberts, Roberts, Ogden, Izard, Smith, Chichger, Struszczak and Rawcliffe.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Shaun Chapman (S)

Army Recruit Health and Performance Research, HQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, Medical Branch, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, United Kingdom.
Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Justin Roberts (J)

Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Andrew J Roberts (AJ)

Army Recruit Health and Performance Research, HQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, Medical Branch, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, United Kingdom.

Henry Ogden (H)

Army Recruit Health and Performance Research, HQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, Medical Branch, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, United Kingdom.

Rachel Izard (R)

Defence Science and Technology, UK Ministry of Defence, Salisbury, United Kingdom.

Lee Smith (L)

Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Havovi Chichger (H)

Biomedical Science Research Group, School of Life Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Lauren Struszczak (L)

Public Health and Sports Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Alex J Rawcliffe (AJ)

Army Recruit Health and Performance Research, HQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, Medical Branch, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH