Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B exhibiting suboptimal response to entecavir.

Chronic hepatitis B Entecavir Renal and bone toxicity Suboptimal response Tenofovir alafenamide Virologic response

Journal

World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 10 11 2023
revised: 23 11 2023
accepted: 28 11 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Entecavir (ETV) is a potent and safe antiviral agent for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, some patients may exhibit suboptimal response or resistance to ETV. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel tenofovir prodrug with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced renal and bone toxicity compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from ETV to TAF in patients with CHB exhibiting suboptimal response to ETV. A total of 60 patients with CHB who had been treated with ETV for at least 12 mo and had persistent or recurrent viremia [Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL] or partial virologic response (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL, but detectable) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to either continue ETV (0.5 mg) daily or switch to TAF (25 mg) daily for 48 wk. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response (HBV DNA level < 20 IU/mL) at week 48. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and anti-HBe levels, and renal and bone safety parameters. At week 48, the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response was significantly higher in the TAF group than in the ETV group (93.3% Switching from ETV to TAF is effective and safe for patients with CHB exhibiting a suboptimal response to ETV and may prevent further viral resistance and reduce renal and bone toxicity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Entecavir (ETV) is a potent and safe antiviral agent for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, some patients may exhibit suboptimal response or resistance to ETV. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a novel tenofovir prodrug with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced renal and bone toxicity compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from ETV to TAF in patients with CHB exhibiting suboptimal response to ETV.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 60 patients with CHB who had been treated with ETV for at least 12 mo and had persistent or recurrent viremia [Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL] or partial virologic response (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL, but detectable) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to either continue ETV (0.5 mg) daily or switch to TAF (25 mg) daily for 48 wk. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response (HBV DNA level < 20 IU/mL) at week 48. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and anti-HBe levels, and renal and bone safety parameters.
RESULTS RESULTS
At week 48, the proportion of patients who achieved a virologic response was significantly higher in the TAF group than in the ETV group (93.3%
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Switching from ETV to TAF is effective and safe for patients with CHB exhibiting a suboptimal response to ETV and may prevent further viral resistance and reduce renal and bone toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38130795
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i34.8139
pmc: PMC10731186
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

8139-8146

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Auteurs

Gui-Cai Yuan (GC)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Ai-Zhen Chen (AZ)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China. caz996642292@163.com.

Wei-Xin Wang (WX)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Xu-Lan Yi (XL)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Long Tu (L)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Fang Peng (F)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Zhi-Hong Qiu (ZH)

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yichun University Second Affiliated Hospital, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China.

Classifications MeSH