Open transcatheter double valve-in-valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses on the arrested heart.

Bioprosthesis degeneration Transcatheter double valve replacement Valve-in-valve

Journal

European heart journal. Case reports
ISSN: 2514-2119
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101730741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 24 10 2022
revised: 29 11 2023
accepted: 07 12 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Failing bioprosthesis is an emerging issue due to (i) a shift towards liberal bioprosthesis implantation instead of mechanical prosthesis and (ii) an ageing population. Management of high-risk patients with bioprosthesis degeneration remains challenging. An 82-year-old patient with history of aortic and mitral valve replacement six years before presents with severe dyspnoea. Echocardiograpic assessment reveals (i) structural valve degeneration of the mitral prosthesis (severe stenosis and regurgitation) with concomitant major annular calcifications and (ii) structural valve degeneration of the aortic prosthesis with low-flow, low-gradient restenosis. Due to mitral annular calcifications, the risk of double valve re-replacement and the age of the patient conventional reoperation was deemed very high. The patient is evaluated for transapical double valve implantation. This option is rejected due to the high risk of left ventricular outflow obstruction. The patient is treated with an open transcatheter double valve-in-valve procedure at the following sequence: leaflet resection of the mitral bioprosthesis, mitral valve implantation and fixation under direct view, leaflet resection of the aortic bioprosthesis, and valve frame cracking and aortic valve implantation under direct view. Post-bypass echocardiography shows neither left ventricular outflow tract obstruction nor paravalvular leak or prosthesis dysfunction. The patient is extubated on the first post-operative day and transferred to normal care unit. Open transcatheter double valve-in-valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses on the arrested heart might be a valuable alternative to treat selected high-risk patients with bioprosthetic valve degeneration.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Failing bioprosthesis is an emerging issue due to (i) a shift towards liberal bioprosthesis implantation instead of mechanical prosthesis and (ii) an ageing population. Management of high-risk patients with bioprosthesis degeneration remains challenging.
Case summary UNASSIGNED
An 82-year-old patient with history of aortic and mitral valve replacement six years before presents with severe dyspnoea. Echocardiograpic assessment reveals (i) structural valve degeneration of the mitral prosthesis (severe stenosis and regurgitation) with concomitant major annular calcifications and (ii) structural valve degeneration of the aortic prosthesis with low-flow, low-gradient restenosis. Due to mitral annular calcifications, the risk of double valve re-replacement and the age of the patient conventional reoperation was deemed very high. The patient is evaluated for transapical double valve implantation. This option is rejected due to the high risk of left ventricular outflow obstruction. The patient is treated with an open transcatheter double valve-in-valve procedure at the following sequence: leaflet resection of the mitral bioprosthesis, mitral valve implantation and fixation under direct view, leaflet resection of the aortic bioprosthesis, and valve frame cracking and aortic valve implantation under direct view. Post-bypass echocardiography shows neither left ventricular outflow tract obstruction nor paravalvular leak or prosthesis dysfunction. The patient is extubated on the first post-operative day and transferred to normal care unit.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Open transcatheter double valve-in-valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses on the arrested heart might be a valuable alternative to treat selected high-risk patients with bioprosthetic valve degeneration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38130856
doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad617
pii: ytad617
pmc: PMC10733589
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

ytad617

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Auteurs

Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü (C)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Johannes Holfeld (J)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Felix Naegele (F)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Michael Grimm (M)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Nikolaos Bonaros (N)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Classifications MeSH