Psychometric validation of the Ostomy Skin Tool 2.0.

Ostomy Ostomy skin tool Peristomal skin Psychometric validation

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 25 08 2023
accepted: 24 11 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) pose a major challenge for people living with an ostomy. To avoid severe PSCs, it is important that people with an ostomy check their peristomal skin condition on a regular basis and seek professional help when needed. To validate a new ostomy skin tool (OST 2.0) that will make regular assessment of the peristomal skin easier. Seventy subjects participating in a clinical trial were eligible for the analysis and data used for the validation. Item-level correlation with anchors, inter-item correlations, convergent validity of domains, test-retest reliability, anchor- and distribution-based methods for assessment of meaningful change were all part of the psychometric validation of the tool. A final tool was established including six patient reported outcome items and automatic assessment of the discolored peristomal area. Follow-up with cognitive debriefing interviews assured that the concepts were considered relevant for people with an ostomy. The OST 2.0 demonstrated evidence supporting its reliability and validity as an outcome measure to capture both visible and non-visible peristomal skin complications.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) pose a major challenge for people living with an ostomy. To avoid severe PSCs, it is important that people with an ostomy check their peristomal skin condition on a regular basis and seek professional help when needed.
Aim UNASSIGNED
To validate a new ostomy skin tool (OST 2.0) that will make regular assessment of the peristomal skin easier.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Seventy subjects participating in a clinical trial were eligible for the analysis and data used for the validation. Item-level correlation with anchors, inter-item correlations, convergent validity of domains, test-retest reliability, anchor- and distribution-based methods for assessment of meaningful change were all part of the psychometric validation of the tool.
Results UNASSIGNED
A final tool was established including six patient reported outcome items and automatic assessment of the discolored peristomal area. Follow-up with cognitive debriefing interviews assured that the concepts were considered relevant for people with an ostomy.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The OST 2.0 demonstrated evidence supporting its reliability and validity as an outcome measure to capture both visible and non-visible peristomal skin complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38130931
doi: 10.7717/peerj.16685
pii: 16685
pmc: PMC10734405
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e16685

Informations de copyright

©2023 Jemec et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

During the investigation, Nana O. Herschend, Zenia Størling and Helle Doré Hansen were employed by Coloplast A/S, and Amy Findley, Abi Williams and Kate Sully were employed by Adelphi Values.

Auteurs

Gregor Jemec (G)

Department of Dermatology, Roskilde Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Nana Overgaard Herschend (NO)

Clinical Strategies, Coloplast A/S, Humlebæk, Denmark.

Helle Doré Hansen (HD)

Clinical Strategies, Coloplast A/S, Humlebæk, Denmark.

Amy Findley (A)

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, United Kingdom.

Abi Williams (A)

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, United Kingdom.

Kate Sully (K)

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, United Kingdom.

Tonny Karlsmark (T)

Copenhagen Wound Healing Centre, Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, København, Denmark.

Zenia Størling (Z)

Clinical Strategies, Coloplast A/S, Humlebæk, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH