Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Tertiary Medical Intensive Care Unit.

critical care echocardiography diagnostic accuracy point-of-care ultrasound

Journal

Critical care explorations
ISSN: 2639-8028
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Explor
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Critical care echocardiography (CCE) is a useful tool for managing critically ill patients in intensive care. However, concerns exist regarding the accuracy of CCE examinations because of operator dependence. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of CCE examinations compared with cardiology-performed transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients in a medical ICU in a large academic medical center in the United States. We compared CCE examinations performed by a fellow and reviewed by a staff physician between May 5, 2020, and December 31, 2021, to TTE obtained within 24 hours of the CCE examination. We developed a standardized process for documentation of all CCE examinations performed in the medical ICU. We assessed agreement (kappa statistic), sensitivity and specificity of CCE examination compared with TTE. Features included left ventricle (LV) systolic function, right ventricle (RV) size, RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, mitral insufficiency, tricuspid insufficiency, and aortic insufficiency. The study analyzed 504 pairs of CCE and TTE examinations. Kappa statistics for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction, pericardial effusion, and RV size ranged from 0.60 to 0.74. CCE showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting LV and RV systolic dysfunction and pericardial effusion, with values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99. The kappa statistic for detecting RV dilation was 0.59, with a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.85. In contrast, CCE examinations were nondiagnostic for mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency in 60-70% of cases, whereas TTE examinations were nondiagnostic in 20-30% of cases. Kappa statistics for mitral, tricuspid, and aortic insufficiency ranged from 0.32 to 0.42. CCE is a reliable tool for assessing LV and RV systolic function, pericardial effusion, and RV size. However, CCE may be limited in its ability to detect mitral, tricuspid, or aortic insufficiency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38131017
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001019
pmc: PMC10735065
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e1019

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Steven Fox (S)

Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Mahmoud Alwakeel (M)

Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Xiaofeng Wang (X)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Siddharth Dugar (S)

Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Neal Chaisson (N)

Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Classifications MeSH