Cigarette packaging, warnings, prices, and contraband: A discrete choice experiment among smokers in Ontario, Canada.

Canada Cigarette smoking Discrete-choice experiment Illicit Ontario Price Product labeling Product packaging Stated preferences Tobacco

Journal

Economics and human biology
ISSN: 1873-6130
Titre abrégé: Econ Hum Biol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101166135

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 22 03 2023
revised: 22 11 2023
accepted: 09 12 2023
medline: 22 12 2023
pubmed: 22 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In Canada, despite substantial decline, tobacco use remains the leading risk factor responsible for mortality and morbidity. There is overwhelming evidence that higher tobacco taxes reduce tobacco use, even if high taxes create an incentive to avoid or evade tobacco taxes. Recently, in addition to taxes, plain and standardized packaging and printing a warning on each cigarette have been lauded to reduce tobacco use. In November 2019, Canada became the country with the most comprehensive cigarette packaging regulations; and in June 2022, Canada proposed to print health warnings on individual cigarettes, the first jurisdiction to ever do so. The regulations came into force on August 1, 2023, and are being implemented through a stepwise approach. Our objective was to examine the effects of plain and standardized packaging, warning on cigarettes, price, and the availability of illicit cigarettes on intention to purchase and risk perceptions. We conducted a discrete choice experiment, and examined heterogeneity in preferences using latent class models among smokers in Ontario, Canada. We found that using latent class analyses was essential in quantifying preferences for attributes of cigarettes and cigarette packs. First, nearly half of smokers stated a preference for cheaper illicit cigarettes in a branded pack without any health warnings, regardless of the licit cigarette alternatives. For about 20% of respondents, plain packaging and especially warning on cigarette sticks decreased the probability of stating a purchasing preference for these alternatives. Third, about a third of respondents chose competing alternatives with mostly one attribute in mind, price. Lastly, none of the products and attributes seem to have significantly influenced risk perception. Our findings attest to the importance of prices and taxes, to the potential of warnings on cigarette sticks to control tobacco use, and indicate that efforts to restrict the availability of illicit cigarettes may yield substantial benefits.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38134576
pii: S1570-677X(23)00121-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101340
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101340

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

G Emmanuel Guindon (GE)

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: emmanuel.guindon@mcmaster.ca.

Emmanouil Mentzakis (E)

Department of Economics, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Neil J Buckley (NJ)

Department of Economics, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH