Behavioural and social drivers of COVID-19 vaccination in Vietnam: a scoping review.

COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Infection Vaccination

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 22 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Understanding of the behavioural and social drivers (BeSD) of vaccination is key to addressing vaccine hesitancy and accessibility issues. Vietnam's national COVID-19 vaccination programme resulted in high uptake of primary doses among adults, but lower booster doses for adults and primary doses for 5-11 years. This scoping review assessed BeSD influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Vietnam to design interventions on reaching the national vaccination targets. We conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed, MedRxiv, LitCOVID, COVID-19 LOVE platform, WHO's COVID-19 research database and seven dominant Vietnamese language medical journals published in English or Vietnamese between 28 December 2019 and 28 November 2022. Data were narratively synthesised and summarised according to the four components of the WHO BeSD framework. The drivers were then mapped along the timeline of COVID-19 vaccine deployment and the evolution of the pandemic in Vietnam. We identified 680 records, of which 39 met the inclusion criteria comprising 224 204 participants. Adults' intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines for themselves (23 studies) ranged from 58.0% to 98.1%. Parental intention to vaccinate their under 11-year-old children (six studies) ranged from 32.8% to 79.6%. Key drivers of vaccination uptake were perceived susceptibility and severity of disease, perceived vaccine benefits and safety, healthcare worker recommendation, and positive societal perception. Commonly reported COVID-19 vaccines' information sources (six studies) were social and mainstream media (82%-67%), television (72.7%-51.6%) and healthcare workers (47.5%-17.5%). Key drivers of COVID-19 uptake remained consistent for both adults and children despite changes in community transmission and vaccine deployment. Key enablers of vaccine uptake for adults and children included perceived disease severity, perceived vaccine benefits and safety and healthcare worker recommendations. Future studies should assess vaccine communication targeted to these drivers, national policies and political determinants to optimise vaccine uptake.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Understanding of the behavioural and social drivers (BeSD) of vaccination is key to addressing vaccine hesitancy and accessibility issues. Vietnam's national COVID-19 vaccination programme resulted in high uptake of primary doses among adults, but lower booster doses for adults and primary doses for 5-11 years. This scoping review assessed BeSD influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Vietnam to design interventions on reaching the national vaccination targets.
METHOD METHODS
We conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed, MedRxiv, LitCOVID, COVID-19 LOVE platform, WHO's COVID-19 research database and seven dominant Vietnamese language medical journals published in English or Vietnamese between 28 December 2019 and 28 November 2022. Data were narratively synthesised and summarised according to the four components of the WHO BeSD framework. The drivers were then mapped along the timeline of COVID-19 vaccine deployment and the evolution of the pandemic in Vietnam.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 680 records, of which 39 met the inclusion criteria comprising 224 204 participants. Adults' intention to receive COVID-19 vaccines for themselves (23 studies) ranged from 58.0% to 98.1%. Parental intention to vaccinate their under 11-year-old children (six studies) ranged from 32.8% to 79.6%. Key drivers of vaccination uptake were perceived susceptibility and severity of disease, perceived vaccine benefits and safety, healthcare worker recommendation, and positive societal perception. Commonly reported COVID-19 vaccines' information sources (six studies) were social and mainstream media (82%-67%), television (72.7%-51.6%) and healthcare workers (47.5%-17.5%). Key drivers of COVID-19 uptake remained consistent for both adults and children despite changes in community transmission and vaccine deployment.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Key enablers of vaccine uptake for adults and children included perceived disease severity, perceived vaccine benefits and safety and healthcare worker recommendations. Future studies should assess vaccine communication targeted to these drivers, national policies and political determinants to optimise vaccine uptake.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38135311
pii: bmjopen-2023-081134
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081134
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e081134

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Luong Tran (L)

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Hanoi, Viet Nam luong.tranthituyet@sydney.edu.au.

Tho Dang (T)

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Mai Nguyen (M)

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Jessica Kaufman (J)

Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Isabella Overmars (I)

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Shiva Shrestha (S)

National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.

Ikram Abdi (I)

National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Thao Nguyen (T)

Department of Health Communication, Government of Viet Nam Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Muthu Marahajan (M)

United Nations Children's Fund, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Trang Chu (T)

United Nations Children's Fund, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Margie Danchin (M)

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Gregory Fox (G)

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Thu Anh Nguyen (TA)

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Classifications MeSH