Alveolar Bone Grafting in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Impact of Timing on Palatal Shape.

alveolar bone grafting cleft palate early secondary bone grafting palatal shape

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 16 10 2023
revised: 24 11 2023
accepted: 30 11 2023
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 23 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is a critical surgical intervention in patients with a cleft of the alveolus, aimed at reconstructing the alveolar ridge to facilitate proper eruption, periodontal support, and alignment of adjacent permanent teeth. The optimal timing for ABG remains debated, with late secondary ABG between the ages of 9 and 11 being widely adopted. This study compared the palatal shapes of 28 children at a mean age of 9.5 years (SD = 0.7) who underwent early secondary ABG at a mean age of 2.1 years (SD = 0.6) or 33 children at a mean age of 10.8 years (SD = 1.5) who underwent late secondary ABG at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.3) to 60 non-cleft controls at a mean age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.2). The palatal shapes were captured with 239 landmarks digitized on the palate on a digital model. Utilizing geometric morphometric methods, i.e., generalized Procrustes superimpositions, principal component analysis, and permutation tests, we assessed the impact of ABG timing on palatal morphology. The first five principal components (PCs) explained 64.1% of the total shape variability: PC1 = 26.1%; PC2 = 12%; PC3 = 11.9%; PC4 = 7.8%; and PC5 = 6.4%. The Procrustes distance between both cleft groups and the control group was more than twice as large as the Procrustes distance between the early ABG and late ABG groups. Nonetheless, all intergroup differences were statistically significant. Our findings suggest that early ABG has a limited negative effect on palatal shape, providing comparable outcomes to late ABG. The study highlights the potential suitability of early ABG, challenging conventional practices and encouraging further exploration into its long-term effects on maxillary growth.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38137587
pii: jcm12247519
doi: 10.3390/jcm12247519
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Andrzej Brudnicki (A)

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland.

Tereza Petrova (T)

Department of Orthodontics and Cleft Anomalies, 3rd Medical Faculty, Faculty Hospital Royal Vineard, Dental Clinic, Charles University, 11636 Prague, Czech Republic.

Ivana Dubovska (I)

Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman (AM)

Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Campus Salemba, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.

Yijin Ren (Y)

Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

Piotr S Fudalej (PS)

Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Orthodontics, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, 31-007 Krakow, Poland.

Classifications MeSH