Small Intestinal Contrast Ultrasonography (SICUS) in Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Crohn’s disease SICUS diagnosis magnetic resonance enterography oral contrast ultrasound

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 28 11 2023
revised: 04 12 2023
accepted: 13 12 2023
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 23 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The diagnosis of Crohn's Disease (CD) is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, endoscopy, and imaging data. In Small Intestine Contrast Ultrasonography (SICUS), the ingestion of a macrogol solution as an oral contrast medium may optimize image quality. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SICUS for CD. A literature search was performed in August 2023. We selected only studies where SICUS was compared to a technique that allows the assessment of the whole gastrointestinal tract, such as an MRE, a CT scan, or a surgical evaluation. We estimated pooled weighted sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio for positive and negative tests (PLR/NLR) of SICUS. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) were drawn, and pooled areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Five studies with 325 CD patients were included. SICUS showed a pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of 95% (95% confidence interval CI 89-99%), a specificity = 77% (95% CI 60-90%), and the AUC was 0.94. SICUS demonstrated a pooled sensitivity for strictures of 78% (95% CI 63-88%) and a specificity = 96% (95% CI 85-99%), with AUC = 0.93. For abscesses, SICUS demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 59-100%) and a specificity of 90% (95% CI 74-98%). Fistulae were detected with a pooled sensitivity of 77% (95% CI 46-95%) and a specificity of 92% (95% CI 75-99%). SICUS demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance compared to the gold standard despite some clinical scenarios (stenosis/fistulae) showing suboptimal diagnostic effectiveness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38137782
pii: jcm12247714
doi: 10.3390/jcm12247714
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Giuseppe Losurdo (G)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Margherita De Bellis (M)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Raffaella Rima (R)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Chiara Maria Palmisano (CM)

Internal Medicine Unit "C. Frugoni", Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Paola Dell'Aquila (P)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Andrea Iannone (A)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Enzo Ierardi (E)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Alfredo Di Leo (A)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Mariabeatrice Principi (M)

Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Classifications MeSH