Basic ctDNA Panel Promises Affordable Clinical Validity in Colon Cancer Patients but Not in Pancreas Cancer Patients.

biomarker cancer colon ctDNA pancreas panel

Journal

Life (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-1729
Titre abrégé: Life (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101580444

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 23 10 2023
revised: 10 11 2023
accepted: 19 11 2023
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 23 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker to assess the progression of various solid tumors has been explored extensively. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of utilizing a ctDNA sequencing panel specifically designed to target the most frequently mutated genomic regions in colon and pancreas cancers. Through somatic analysis of colon and pancreas tumors, we targeted 27 regions within eight genes. By employing PCR amplification and Illumina NGS, we ensured that each region was adequately covered with a minimum of 5000 reads (with an average of 12,000 reads). Our method exhibited reproducibility with repetition and dilutions. The positive detection threshold for ctDNA was set at a cutoff value of 0.5% ctDNA of the total reads using IGV. Among the samples analyzed, 71% of colon cancer cases displayed somatic mutations covered by the targeted regions. Within this group, detectable ctDNA was observed in 34% of the cases. Conversely, in pancreatic cancer, 55% of mutations were covered by the panel's regions, but only 13% of these cases exhibited detectable ctDNA. In follow-ups with the patients, changes in ctDNA percentages demonstrated complete concordance with changes in the clinical condition in 88% of the cases. Our findings suggest that employing a basic ctDNA-targeted panel can serve as a cost-effective and reliable approach for repeated monitoring of the efficacy of colon cancer therapy. However, in the case of pancreatic cancer, ctDNA showed limited utility, and alternative biomarkers may offer superior diagnostic value. Additionally, we found that a negative ctDNA test is not a guarantee for a relapse-free recovery; thus, we recommend a continuous follow-up with the patient on a long-term basis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38137875
pii: life13122274
doi: 10.3390/life13122274
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : European Regional Development Fund
ID : TBI-V-240-VBW-084, TBI-V-241-VBW-084, TBI-V-242-VBW-084, TBI-V-243-VBW-084

Auteurs

Mandy Radefeldt (M)

CENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.

Silke Stellmacher-Kaiser (S)

Clinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Susann Krake (S)

CENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.

Brigitte Kragl (B)

Clinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Sabrina Lemke (S)

CENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.

Christian Beetz (C)

CENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.

Peter Bauer (P)

CENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Clinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Christian Junghanß (C)

Clinical for Internal Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Ruslan Al-Ali (R)

CENTOGENE GmbH, Am Strande 7, 18055 Rostock, Germany.

Classifications MeSH