Real-World Data on Second-Line Therapy with Ramucirumab for Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Two-Center Study on Romanian Population.

gastric cancer gastroesophageal junction cancer metastatic disease paclitaxel ramucirumab second-line treatment

Journal

Life (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-1729
Titre abrégé: Life (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101580444

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 24 10 2023
revised: 24 11 2023
accepted: 01 12 2023
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 23 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

(1) Background: Following the results of RAINBOW and REGARD trials, ramucirumab was approved as the standard second-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, alone or in combination with paclitaxel. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in the Romanian population during every-day clinical practice. (2) Methods: A two-center, retrospective, observational study evaluated patients with metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer treated with ramucirumab monotherapy or associated with paclitaxel. The patients were treated between 2018 and 2022 in two Romanian centers as follows: 18 patients underwent treatment with ramucirumab monotherapy, while 51 received the combined treatment regimen. Study endpoints included median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and the evaluation of treatment-induced adverse events (AEs). (3) Results: In the study cohort (n = 69), the most frequent treatment-induced AE in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel arm was hematological toxicity; the most common AE for patients treated with ramucirumab monotherapy was fatigue and headache. Overall, the median PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.4-5.9 months) and median OS was 18.23 months (95% CI: 15.6-20.7 months). PFS was correlated with the number of treatment cycle administrations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at treatment initiation, and metastatic site (visceral vs. peritoneal). OS was correlated with the number of treatment cycles administered and human epidermal growth factor

Identifiants

pubmed: 38137901
pii: life13122300
doi: 10.3390/life13122300
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Diana Galos (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Oncology Institute Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Loredana Balacescu (L)

Department of Genetics, Genomics and Experimental Pathology, The Oncology Institute Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Radu Vidra (R)

Postgraduate Program for Bio-Behavioral Integrative Medicine, Babes-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Daniel Sur (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, The Oncology Institute Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hațieganu", 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Classifications MeSH