Should We Abandon Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? A Meta-Analysis.

advanced ovarian cancer disease-free survival intraperitoneal chemotherapy overall survival primary cytorreductive surgery

Journal

Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 17 10 2023
revised: 17 11 2023
accepted: 20 11 2023
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 23 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ovarian cancer is the gynaecological malignancy with the highest mortality and diagnosis often occurs in its advanced stages. Standard treatment in these cases is based on complete cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy. Other types of treatment are being evaluated to improve the prognosis of these patients, including intraperitoneal chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. These may improve survival or time to relapse in addition to intravenous chemotherapy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine whether treatment with intravenous chemotherapy remains the gold standard, or whether the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has a benefit in overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFS). A literature search was carried out in Pubmed and Cochrane, selecting clinical studies and systematic reviews published in the last 10 years. Statistical analysis was performed using the hazard ratio measure in the RevMan tool. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy shows a benefit in OS and DFS compared with standard intravenous chemotherapy. The significant differences in OS (HR: 0.81 CI 95% 0.74-0.88) and in DFS (HR: 0.81 CI 95% 0.75-0.87) are statistically significant ( Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an option that improves OS and DFS without significant toxicity regarding the use of intravenous chemotherapy alone. However, prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and treatment regimen that will maintain the benefits while minimising side effects and toxicity and the profile of patients who will benefit most from this treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ovarian cancer is the gynaecological malignancy with the highest mortality and diagnosis often occurs in its advanced stages. Standard treatment in these cases is based on complete cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy. Other types of treatment are being evaluated to improve the prognosis of these patients, including intraperitoneal chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. These may improve survival or time to relapse in addition to intravenous chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine whether treatment with intravenous chemotherapy remains the gold standard, or whether the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has a benefit in overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A literature search was carried out in Pubmed and Cochrane, selecting clinical studies and systematic reviews published in the last 10 years. Statistical analysis was performed using the hazard ratio measure in the RevMan tool.
RESULTS RESULTS
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy shows a benefit in OS and DFS compared with standard intravenous chemotherapy. The significant differences in OS (HR: 0.81 CI 95% 0.74-0.88) and in DFS (HR: 0.81 CI 95% 0.75-0.87) are statistically significant (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an option that improves OS and DFS without significant toxicity regarding the use of intravenous chemotherapy alone. However, prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and treatment regimen that will maintain the benefits while minimising side effects and toxicity and the profile of patients who will benefit most from this treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38138863
pii: jpm13121636
doi: 10.3390/jpm13121636
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Maria Teresa Climent (MT)

Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominopelvic Oncological Surgery (MUAPOS), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, 12004 Castellón, Spain.
Oncological Surgery Research Group (OSRG), Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellón, Spain.

Anna Serra (A)

Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominopelvic Oncological Surgery (MUAPOS), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, 12004 Castellón, Spain.
Oncological Surgery Research Group (OSRG), Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellón, Spain.

Carolina Balaguer (C)

Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellón, Spain.

Antoni Llueca (A)

Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominopelvic Oncological Surgery (MUAPOS), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, 12004 Castellón, Spain.
Oncological Surgery Research Group (OSRG), Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellón, Spain.

Classifications MeSH