Accuracy, acceptability and feasibility of photography for use in trachoma surveys: a mixed methods study in Tanzania.

Chlamydia trachomatis Tanzania acceptability feasibility photography trachoma

Journal

International health
ISSN: 1876-3405
Titre abrégé: Int Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517095

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 02 03 2023
revised: 15 09 2023
accepted: 22 11 2023
medline: 23 12 2023
pubmed: 23 12 2023
entrez: 23 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Photography could be used to train individuals to diagnose trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) as trachoma prevalence decreases and to ensure accurate field TF grading in trachoma prevalence surveys. We compared photograph and field TF grading and determined the acceptability and feasibility of eyelid photography to community members and trachoma survey trainers. A total of 100 children ages 1-9 y were examined for TF in two Maasai villages in Tanzania. Two images of the right everted superior tarsal conjunctiva of each child were taken with a smartphone and a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. Two graders independently graded all photos. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with community members and Tropical Data trainers. Of 391 photos, one-fifth were discarded as ungradable. Compared with field grading, photo grading consistently underdiagnosed TF. Compared with field grading, DSLR photo grading resulted in a higher prevalence and sensitivity than smartphone photo grading. FGDs indicated that communities and trainers found photography acceptable and preferred smartphones to DSLR in terms of practicalities, but image quality was of paramount importance for trainers. Photography is acceptable and feasible, but further work is needed to ensure high-quality images that enable accurate and consistent grading before being routinely implemented in trachoma surveys.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Photography could be used to train individuals to diagnose trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) as trachoma prevalence decreases and to ensure accurate field TF grading in trachoma prevalence surveys. We compared photograph and field TF grading and determined the acceptability and feasibility of eyelid photography to community members and trachoma survey trainers.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 100 children ages 1-9 y were examined for TF in two Maasai villages in Tanzania. Two images of the right everted superior tarsal conjunctiva of each child were taken with a smartphone and a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. Two graders independently graded all photos. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with community members and Tropical Data trainers.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 391 photos, one-fifth were discarded as ungradable. Compared with field grading, photo grading consistently underdiagnosed TF. Compared with field grading, DSLR photo grading resulted in a higher prevalence and sensitivity than smartphone photo grading. FGDs indicated that communities and trainers found photography acceptable and preferred smartphones to DSLR in terms of practicalities, but image quality was of paramount importance for trainers.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Photography is acceptable and feasible, but further work is needed to ensure high-quality images that enable accurate and consistent grading before being routinely implemented in trachoma surveys.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38141035
pii: 7492469
doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad111
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Organisme : United States Agency for International Development
ID : 7200AA18CA00040
Organisme : Fred Hollows Foundation

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Auteurs

Donal Bisanzio (D)

RTI International, Washington, DC, USA.

Robert Butcher (R)

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Valérian Turbé (V)

Department of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

Kenji Matsumoto (K)

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Chaitra Dinesh (C)

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Patrick Massae (P)

Department of Ophthalmology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.

Michael Dejene (M)

Sightsavers, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Cristina Jimenez (C)

Sightsavers International, Haywards Health, UK.

Colin Macleod (C)

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Einoti Matayan (E)

Department of Ophthalmology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.

Caleb Mpyet (C)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Sightsavers Nigeria Country Office, Kaduna, Nigeria.

Alex Pavluck (A)

RTI International, Washington, DC, USA.

Martha Idalí Saboyá-Díaz (MI)

Communicable Diseases Prevention, Control, and Elimination Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.

Fentahun Tadesse (F)

Federal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Sandra Liliana Talero (SL)

Escuela Superior de Oftalmología, Instituto Barraquer de América, Bogotá, Colombia.

Anthony W Solomon (AW)

Global Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jeremiah Ngondi (J)

RTI International, Washington, DC, USA.

George Kabona (G)

Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Cecilia Uisso (C)

Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Alistidia Simon (A)

Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.

Upendo Mwingira (U)

RTI International, Washington, DC, USA.
Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, Ministry of Health, Dodoma, Tanzania.
National Institute for Medical Research, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

Emma M Harding-Esch (EM)

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH