Complete digital pathology transition: A large multi-center experience.
Digital pathology
Image management system
Slide scanners
Synoptic reporting
Journal
Pathology, research and practice
ISSN: 1618-0631
Titre abrégé: Pathol Res Pract
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7806109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Dec 2023
12 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
01
11
2023
accepted:
08
12
2023
medline:
25
12
2023
pubmed:
25
12
2023
entrez:
24
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Transitioning from glass slide pathology to digital pathology for primary diagnostics requires an appropriate laboratory information system, an image management system, and slide scanners; it also reinforces the need for sophisticated pathology informatics including synoptic reporting. Previous reports have discussed the transition itself and relevant considerations for it, but not the selection criteria and considerations for the infrastructure. To describe the process used to evaluate slide scanners, image management systems, and synoptic reporting systems for a large multisite institution. Six network hospitals evaluated six slide scanners, three image management systems, and three synoptic reporting systems. Scanners were evaluated based on the quality of image, speed, ease of operation, and special capabilities (including z-stacking, fluorescence and others). Image management and synoptic reporting systems were evaluated for their ease of use and capacity. Among the scanners evaluated, the Leica GT450 produced the highest quality images, while the 3DHistech Pannoramic provided fluorescence and superior z-stacking. The newest generation of scanners, released relatively recently, performed better than slightly older scanners from major manufacturers Although the Olympus VS200 was not fully vetted due to not meeting all inclusion criteria, it is discussed herein due to its exceptional versatility. For Image Management Software, the authors believe that Sectra is, at the time of writing the best developed option, but this could change in the very near future as other systems improve their capabilities. All synoptic reporting systems performed impressively. Specifics regarding quality and abilities of different components will change rapidly with time, but large pathology practices considering such a transition should be aware of the issues discussed and evaluate the most current generation to arrive at appropriate conclusions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38142526
pii: S0344-0338(23)00729-X
doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.155028
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
155028Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Benzion Samueli is a recipient of a Fellowship Grant from the American Physicians Fellowship for Medicine in Israel (AFP). Prof. Sylvia Asa serves on medical advisory boards of Leica Biosystems, Ibex Medical Analytics and Iron Mountain. All remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests. No funding was provided for the preparation of this manuscript. No AI was used in the preparation of this manuscript.