Static and dynamic fMRI-derived functional connectomes represent largely similar information.
Autoregressive model
Brain-behavior associations
Dynamic functional connectivity
Functional connectivity
Journal
Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
ISSN: 2472-1751
Titre abrégé: Netw Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101719149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
28
11
2022
accepted:
06
06
2023
medline:
25
12
2023
pubmed:
25
12
2023
entrez:
25
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Functional connectivity (FC) of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI time series can be estimated using methods that differ in sensitivity to the temporal order of time points (static vs. dynamic) and the number of regions considered in estimating a single edge (bivariate vs. multivariate). Previous research suggests that dynamic FC explains variability in FC fluctuations and behavior beyond static FC. Our aim was to systematically compare methods on both dimensions. We compared five FC methods: Pearson's/full correlation (static, bivariate), lagged correlation (dynamic, bivariate), partial correlation (static, multivariate), and multivariate AR model with and without self-connections (dynamic, multivariate). We compared these methods by (i) assessing similarities between FC matrices, (ii) by comparing node centrality measures, and (iii) by comparing the patterns of brain-behavior associations. Although FC estimates did not differ as a function of sensitivity to temporal order, we observed differences between the multivariate and bivariate FC methods. The dynamic FC estimates were highly correlated with the static FC estimates, especially when comparing group-level FC matrices. Similarly, there were high correlations between the patterns of brain-behavior associations obtained using the dynamic and static FC methods. We conclude that the dynamic FC estimates represent information largely similar to that of the static FC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38144686
doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00325
pii: netn_a_00325
pmc: PMC10631791
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1266-1301Informations de copyright
© 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
J.D.M. and A.A. consult for and hold equity with Neumora (formerly BlackThorn Therapeutics), Manifest Technologies, and are co-inventors on the following patents: Anticevic A, Murray JD, Ji JL: Systems and Methods for Neuro-Behavioral Relationships in Dimensional Geometric Embedding (N-BRIDGE), PCT International Application No. PCT/US2119/022110, filed March 13, 2019 and Murray JD, Anticevic A, Martin, WJ:Methods and tools for detecting, diagnosing, predicting, prognosticating, or treating a neurobehavioral phenotype in a subject, U.S. Application No. 16/149,903 filed on October 2, 2018, U.S. Application for PCT International Application No. 18/054,009 filed on October 2, 2018. G.R. consults for and holds equity with Neumora (formerly BlackThorn Therapeutics) and Manifest Technologies. A.M. declares no conflict of interest.