Evaluating the Educational Value of Cancer Registries - a Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.
Cancer registries
Education
Learning
Quality improvement
Journal
Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education
ISSN: 1543-0154
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
accepted:
05
12
2023
medline:
26
12
2023
pubmed:
26
12
2023
entrez:
25
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Cancer registries encompass a broad array of functions that underpin cancer control efforts. Despite education being fundamental to improving patient outcomes, little is known regarding the educational value of cancer registries. This review will evaluate the educational value of cancer registries for key stakeholders as reported within published literature and identify opportunities for enhancing their educational value. Four databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) were searched using a predefined search strategy in keeping with the PRISMA statement. Data was extracted and synthesised in narrative format. Themes and frequency of discussion of educational content were explored using thematic content analysis. From 952 titles, ten eligible studies were identified, highlighting six stakeholder groups. Educational outcomes were identified relating to clinicians (6/10), researchers (5/10), patients (4/10), public health organisations (3/10), medical students (1/10) and the public (1/10). Cancer registries were found to educationally benefit key stakeholders despite educational value not being a key focus of any study. Deliberate efforts to harness the educational value of cancer registries should be considered to enable data-driven quality improvement, with the vast amount of data promising ample educational benefit.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38146032
doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02394-6
pii: 10.1007/s13187-023-02394-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.
Références
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249
doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
pubmed: 33538338
White MC, Babcock F, Hayes NS, Mariotto AB, Wong FL, Kohler BA, Weir HK (2017) The history and use of cancer registry data by public health cancer control programs in the United States. Cancer 123(Suppl 24):4969–4976. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30905
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30905
pubmed: 29205307
What is a Cancer Registry?: National Cancer Institute. https://seer.cancer.gov/registries/cancer_registry/index.html . Accessed 3 Jul 2022
Armstrong BK (1992) The role of the cancer registry in cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 3(6):569–579
doi: 10.1007/BF00052754
pubmed: 1384732
Platz EA (2017) Reducing cancer burden in the population: an overview of epidemiologic evidence to support policies, systems, and environmental changes. Epidemiol Rev 39(1):1–10
doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx009
pubmed: 28460082
pmcid: 5868280
Pop B, Fetica B, Blaga ML, Trifa AP, Achimas-Cadariu P, Vlad CI et al (2019) The role of medical registries, potential applications and limitations. Med Pharm Rep 92(1):7–14
pubmed: 30957080
pmcid: 6448488
Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C et al (2011) Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 377(9760):127–138
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3
pubmed: 21183212
pmcid: 3018568
Das A (2009) Cancer registry databases: an overview of techniques of statistical analysis and impact on cancer epidemiology. Methods Mol Biol 471:31–49
doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-416-2_2
pubmed: 19109773
Parkin DM, Bray F (2009) Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer 45(5):756–764
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033
pubmed: 19128954
Bray F, Parkin DM (2009) Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer 45(5):747–755
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.032
pubmed: 19117750
McLaughlin RH, Clarke CA, Crawley LM, Glaser SL (2010) Are cancer registries unconstitutional? Soc Sci Med 70(9):1295–1300
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.032
pubmed: 20199835
pmcid: 2849865
Ingelfinger JR, Drazen JM (2004) Registry research and medical privacy. N Engl J Med 350(14):1452–1453
doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048027
pubmed: 15070797
State Government of Victoria (2014) Improving Cancer Outcomes Act. Updated October 1, 2016. https://content.legislation.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/d02c56bb-ecc8-31be-b7d9-6ac1b7cdbb12_14-78aa002%20authorised.pdf . Accessed 28 Jun 2022
Cancer Australia AG. Improving Cancer Data 2022. https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/research/data-and-statistics/cancer-data/improving-cancer-data . Accessed 11 Aug 2022
Thomas DB (2002) Alternatives to a national system of population-based state cancer registries. Am J Public Health 92(7):1064–1066
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.7.1064
pubmed: 12084679
pmcid: 1447188
Wormald JS, Oberai T, Branford-White H, Johnson LJ (2020) Design and establishment of a cancer registry: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 90(7-8):1277–1282
doi: 10.1111/ans.16084
pubmed: 32564454
Parkin DM (2006) The evolution of the population-based cancer registry. Nat Rev Cancer 6(8):603–612
doi: 10.1038/nrc1948
pubmed: 16862191
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj 372:n71
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
pubmed: 33782057
pmcid: 8005924
Sullivan GM (2011) Deconstructing quality in education research. J Grad Med Educ 3(2):121–124
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00083.1
pubmed: 22655130
pmcid: 3184904
Cook DA, Reed DA (2015) Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education. Acad Med 90(8):1067–1076
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000786
pubmed: 26107881
Kiger ME, Varpio L (2020) Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach 42(8):846–854
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
pubmed: 32356468
Jiagge E, Bensenhaver JM, Oppong JK, Awuah B, Newman LA (2015) Global surgical oncology disease burden: addressing disparities via global surgery initiatives: the University of Michigan International Breast Cancer Registry. Ann Surg Oncol 22(3):734–740
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4345-7
pubmed: 25582742
Chen AM, Kupelian PA, Wang PC, Steinberg ML (2018) Development of a radiation oncology-specific prospective data registry for research and quality improvement: a clinical workflow-based solution. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2:1–9
doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00036
pubmed: 30652617
Auffenberg GB, Ghani KR, Ramani S, Usoro E, Denton B, Rogers C et al (2019) askMUSIC: Leveraging a clinical registry to develop a new machine learning model to inform patients of prostate cancer treatments chosen by similar men. Eur Urol 75(6):901–907
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.050
pubmed: 30318331
Joishy SK, Driscol JC (1989) The ailments of cancer registries: a proposal for remedial education. J Cancer Educ 4(1):17–31
doi: 10.1080/08858198909527964
pubmed: 2641505
Struth D (2017) Oncology Qualified Clinical Data Registry: a patient-centered, symptom-focused framework to guide quality improvement. Clin J Oncol Nurs 21(6):755–757
doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.755-757
pubmed: 29149135
Burton RC (2002) Cancer control in Australia: into the 21(st) Century. Jpn J Clin Oncol 32(Suppl):S3–S9
doi: 10.1093/jjco/hye121
pubmed: 11959870
MacCallum C, Skandarajah A, Gibbs P, Hayes I (2018) The value of clinical colorectal cancer registries in colorectal cancer research: a systematic review. JAMA Surg 153(9):841–849
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1635
pubmed: 29926104
Meiser B, Monnik M, Austin R, Nichols C, Cops E, Salmon L et al (2022) Stakeholder attitudes towards establishing a national genomics registry of inherited cancer predisposition: a qualitative study. J Community Genet 13(1):59–73
doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00559-8
pubmed: 34727336
Rothenmund H, Singh H, Candas B, Chodirker BN, Serfas K, Aronson M et al (2013) Hereditary colorectal cancer registries in Canada: report from the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada consensus meeting; Montreal, Quebec; October 28, 2011. Curr Oncol 20(5):273–278
doi: 10.3747/co.20.1566
pubmed: 24155632
pmcid: 3805403
Yardley S, Dornan T (2012) Kirkpatrick's levels and education 'evidence'. Med Educ 46(1):97–106
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x
pubmed: 22150201