Addressing the need for Indigenous-specific PROMs and PREMS: A focus on methodology.
Indigenous peoples
access and evaluation
healthcare quality
patient-reported experience measures
patient-reported outcome measures
Journal
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
16
11
2023
received:
24
08
2023
accepted:
22
11
2023
medline:
26
12
2023
pubmed:
26
12
2023
entrez:
26
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Differences in Indigenous worldviews, practices and values highlight the need for Indigenous-specific health quality indicators, such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The purpose of this paper is to present our methodology, as part of a larger study that sought to develop a framework for creating Indigenous-specific PROMs and PREMs. The research design was informed by Indigenous research methodology and a community-based participatory approach. It had three core components: (1) a literature exploration of existing Indigenous-specific PROMs and PREMs; (2) interviews with researchers with expertise in PROMs and PREMs developed for Indigenous populations and community leaders interested in using these Indigenous-informed evaluation tools; and (3) conversations with Indigenous community members about their experiences with health surveys. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim; transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using an inductive and deductive approach. Themes and sub-themes were identified to build a framework that honours Indigenous knowledges and ways of knowing. Results were validated with select research participants and the Project Advisory Committee. Findings demonstrate how relationship building is the necessary starting point for engagement when developing survey instruments with Indigenous peoples. Engagement requires respectful collaboration through all stages of the project from determining what questions are asked to how the information will be collected, interpreted, and managed. A relational stance requires responsibility to Indigenous communities and peoples that goes beyond research carried out using a western scientific lens. It means ensuring that the project is beneficial to the community and framing questions based on Indigenous knowledge, worldviews, and community involvement. This study employed a collaborative, participatory qualitative approach to develop a framework for creating PROMs and PREMs with Indigenous peoples. The methods described offer concrete examples of strategies that can be employed to support relationship-building and collaboration when developing Indigenous-specific survey instruments.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Michael Smith Health Research BC
Informations de copyright
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Smylie J. Understanding the health of Indigenous peoples in Canada: key methodological and conceptual challenges. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;175(6):602. doi:10.1503/cmaj.060940
Aboriginal Health Policy Directorate. Aboriginal Patient Experience. Review and Recommendations For Improvement. Department of Health of Western Australia; 2018. https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/general-documents/Aboriginal-health/PDF/Aboriginal-Patient-Experience-Review-and-recommendations-for-improvements.pdf
Geddes B. Measuring Wellness: An Indicator Development Guide for First Nations. First Nations of British Columbia. BC: Held In Trust by Ktunaxa Nation Council; 2015.
Haywood A, Wodtke L, Craft A, et al. Addressing the need for indigenous and decolonized quantitative research methods in Canada. SSM Popul Health. 2021;15:1-11. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100899
Smylie J, Lana D. Achieving Strength through Numbers: First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Health Information. University of Northern British Columbia. 2010. https://www.nccih.ca/495/Achieving_strength_through_numbers__First_Nations,_Inuit,_and_M%C3%A9tis_health_information.nccih?id=1
Steffler J. The Indigenous data landscape in Canada: an overview. Aborig Policy Stud. 2016;5(2):149-164. doi:10.5663/aps.v5i2.26992
British Columbia First Nations Data Governance Initiative (BCFNDGI). 2015. Accessed March 2022. http://www.bcfndgi.com/
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) Manitoba. Na-gah mo Waabishkizi Ojijaak Bimise Keetwaatino: Singing White Crane Flying North: Gathering a Bundle for Indigenous Evaluation. 2018. Retrieved March 2022 from: http://www.policyalternatives.ca
Mainz J, Kristensen S, Roe D. The power of the patient's voice in the modern health care system. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022;34(Suppl_1):ii1-ii2.
de Bienassis K, Kristensen S, Hewlett E, Roe D, Mainz J, Klazinga N. Measuring patient voice matters: setting the scene for patient-reported indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022;34(Suppl_1):ii3-ii6.
de Bienassis K, Kristensen S, Hewlett E, Roe D, Mainz J, Klazinga N. Patient-reported indicators in mental health care: towards international standards among members of the OECD. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022;34(Suppl_1):ii7-ii12.
Angell B, Muhunthan J, Eades AM, et al. The health-related quality of life of Indigenous populations: a global systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(9):2161-2178. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1311-9
Green M, Anderson K, Griffiths K, Garvey G, Cunningham J. Understanding Indigenous Australians' experiences of cancer care: stakeholders' views on what to measure and how to measure it. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:982. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3780-8
Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR). CHIHR Guidelines for Health Research Involving Aboriginal People (2007-2010). 2010. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134.html#4
Kovach M. Conversational method in Indigenous research. First Peoples Child Fam Rev. 2010;14(1):124-136.
Harfield S, Pearson O, Morey K, et al. Assessing the quality of health research from an Indigenous perspective: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:79. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00959-3
Wilson S. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing; 2008.
d'Agincourt-Canning L, Ziabakhsh S, Morgan J, et al. Pathways: a guide for developing culturally safe and appropriate patient-reported outcome (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) with indigenous peoples. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023;1-12. doi:10.1111/jep.13947
Ziabakhsh S, d'Agincourt-Canning L, Joolae S, Hwang J, Jinkerson-Brass S, Morgan J. Patient reported outcome (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) for Indigenous peoples: a scoping review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023;253:111017.
Azungah T. Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qual Res J. 2018;18:383-400. doi:10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237-246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
Macklin C, King M, Kallos A, et al. Water journey: methods for exploring the research priorities for Indigenous peoples in Canada and hepatitis C. Canadi J Aborig Community Based HIV/AIDS Res. 2016;8:44-45.
National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Indigenous Approaches to Program Evaluation. 2013. https://www.nccih.ca/495/Indigenous_Approaches_to_Program_Evaluation.nccih?id=125