Caregiver-reported quality of communication in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
caregiver
communication
pancreatic cancer
periampullary cancer
quality of care
Journal
Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
05
10
2023
received:
05
06
2023
accepted:
25
10
2023
medline:
26
12
2023
pubmed:
26
12
2023
entrez:
26
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Communication between caregivers and clinical team members is critical for transitional care, but its quality and potential impact on outcomes are not well understood. This study reports on caregiver-reported quality of communication with clinical team members in the postpancreatectomy period and examines associations of these reports with patient and caregiver outcomes. Caregivers of patients with pancreatic and periampullary malignancies who had undergone pancreatectomy were surveyed. Instrument measures assessed care experiences using the Caregiver Perceptions About Communication with Clinical Team Members (CAPACITY) instrument. The instrument has two main subscales: communication, assessing the extent to which providers helped caregivers comprehend details of clinical visits, and capacity, defined as the extent to which providers assessed whether caregivers were able to care for patients. Of 265 caregivers who were approached, 240 (90.6%) enrolled in the study. The mean communication and capacity subscale scores were 2.7 ± 0.6 and 1.5 ± 0.6, respectively (range, 0-4 [higher = better]). Communication subscale scores were lower among caregivers of patients who experienced (vs. those who did not experience) a 30-day readmission (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6, respectively; p = .047). Capacity subscale scores were inversely associated with restriction in patient daily activities (a 0.04 decrement in the capacity score for every 1 point in daily activity restriction; p = .008). After pancreatectomy, patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer whose caregivers reported worse communication with care providers were more likely to experience readmission. Caregivers of patients with greater daily activity restrictions were less likely to report being asked about the caregiver's skill and capacity by clinicians. This prospective study used a validated survey instrument and reports on the quality of communication between health care providers and caregivers as reported by caregivers of patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer after pancreatectomy. In an analysis of 240 caregivers enrolled in the study, lower communication scores (the extent to which providers helped caregivers understand clinical details) were associated with higher odds of 30-day patient readmission to the hospital. In addition, lower capacity scores (the extent to which providers assessed caregivers' ability to care for patients) were associated with greater impairment in caregivers. The strikingly low communication quality and capacity assessment scores suggest substantial room for improvement, with the potential to improve both caregiver and patient outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Communication between caregivers and clinical team members is critical for transitional care, but its quality and potential impact on outcomes are not well understood. This study reports on caregiver-reported quality of communication with clinical team members in the postpancreatectomy period and examines associations of these reports with patient and caregiver outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
Caregivers of patients with pancreatic and periampullary malignancies who had undergone pancreatectomy were surveyed. Instrument measures assessed care experiences using the Caregiver Perceptions About Communication with Clinical Team Members (CAPACITY) instrument. The instrument has two main subscales: communication, assessing the extent to which providers helped caregivers comprehend details of clinical visits, and capacity, defined as the extent to which providers assessed whether caregivers were able to care for patients.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 265 caregivers who were approached, 240 (90.6%) enrolled in the study. The mean communication and capacity subscale scores were 2.7 ± 0.6 and 1.5 ± 0.6, respectively (range, 0-4 [higher = better]). Communication subscale scores were lower among caregivers of patients who experienced (vs. those who did not experience) a 30-day readmission (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6, respectively; p = .047). Capacity subscale scores were inversely associated with restriction in patient daily activities (a 0.04 decrement in the capacity score for every 1 point in daily activity restriction; p = .008).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
After pancreatectomy, patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer whose caregivers reported worse communication with care providers were more likely to experience readmission. Caregivers of patients with greater daily activity restrictions were less likely to report being asked about the caregiver's skill and capacity by clinicians.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY
CONCLUSIONS
This prospective study used a validated survey instrument and reports on the quality of communication between health care providers and caregivers as reported by caregivers of patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer after pancreatectomy. In an analysis of 240 caregivers enrolled in the study, lower communication scores (the extent to which providers helped caregivers understand clinical details) were associated with higher odds of 30-day patient readmission to the hospital. In addition, lower capacity scores (the extent to which providers assessed caregivers' ability to care for patients) were associated with greater impairment in caregivers. The strikingly low communication quality and capacity assessment scores suggest substantial room for improvement, with the potential to improve both caregiver and patient outcomes.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F32CA217455
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 American Cancer Society.
Références
Wolff JL, Feder J, Schulz R. Supporting family caregivers of older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(26):2513-2515. doi:10.1056/nejmp1612351
Coe NB, Werner RM. Informal caregivers provide considerable front-line support in residential care facilities and nursing homes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(1):105-111. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01239
van Leersum NJ, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Wouters MWJM, et al. Increasing prevalence of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer in the South of the Netherlands 1995-2010. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(9):2157-2163. doi:10.1002/ijc.27871
Kim Y, Schulz R. Family caregivers’ strains: comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. J Aging Health. 2008;20(5):483-503. doi:10.1177/0898264308317533
Kent EE, Rowland JH, Northouse L, et al. Caring for caregivers and patients: research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122(13):1987-1995. doi:10.1002/cncr.29939
Rowland JH, Hewitt M, Ganz PA. Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in delivering quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(32):5101-5104. doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.2700
DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004;23(2):207-218. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207
Farber SJ, Egnew TR, Herman-Bertsch JL, Taylor TR, Guldin GE. Issues in end-of-life care: patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions. J Palliat Med. 2003;6(1):19-31. doi:10.1089/10966210360510082
Van Houtven CH. Standing up for my sister. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(10):1523-1527. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00780
Swan BA. A nurse learns firsthand that you may fend for yourself after a hospital stay. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(11):2579-2582. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0516
Van Houtven CH, Oddone EZ, Weinberger M. Informal and formal care infrastructure and perceived need for caregiver training for frail US veterans referred to home and community-based services. Chronic Illn. 2010;6(1):57-66. doi:10.1177/1742395309352694
van Ryn M, Sanders S, Kahn K, et al. Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: a hidden quality issue? Psychooncology. 2011;20(1):44-52. doi:10.1002/pon.1703
Fong ZV, Teinor J, Yeo TP, et al. Assessment of caregivers’ burden when caring for patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(11):1468-1475. doi:10.1093/jnci/djac153
Smith GR, Williamson GM, Miller LS, Schulz R. Depression and quality of informal care: a longitudinal investigation of caregiving stressors. Psychol Aging. 2011;26(3):584-591. doi:10.1037/a0022263
Van Houtven CH, Miller KEM, O’Brien EC, et al. Development and initial validation of the CAregiver Perceptions About CommunIcation with Clinical Team members (CAPACITY) measure. Med Care Res Rev. 2019;76(6):784-806. doi:10.1177/1077558717747985
Fong ZV, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP, et al. Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them? A 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):137-144; discussion 144-145. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2336-9
Fernández-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D, et al. Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery. 2012;152(3 suppl 1):S56-S63. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.05.022
Yeo TP, Cannaday S, Thompson R, et al. Distress, depression, and the effect of zip code in pancreatobiliary cancer patients and their significant others. J Am Coll Surg. 2023;236(2):339-349. doi:10.1097/XCS.0000000000000469
Fong ZV, Alvino DM, Castillo CFD, et al. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes in 5-year survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2017;266(4):685-692. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002380
Fong ZV, Sekigami Y, Qadan M, et al. Assessment of the long-term impact of pancreatoduodenectomy on health-related quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 module. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4216-4224. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-09853-8
Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, et al. A consensus-based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179-3187. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
National Health & Aging Trends Study. National Study of Caregiving (NSOC). Accessed July 20, 2021. https://www.nhats.org/researcher/nsoc
Freedman VA, Kasper JD, Cornman JC, et al. Validation of new measures of disability and functioning in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(9):1013-1021. doi:10.1093/gerona/glr087
Freedman VA, Agree EM, Cornman JC, Spillman BC, Kasper JD. Reliability and validity of self-care and mobility accommodations measures in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Gerontologist. 2014;54(6):944-951. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt104
Van Houtven CH, Lippmann SJ, Bélanger E, et al. Measurement properties of the CAPACITY instrument to assess perceived communication with the health care team among care partners of patients with cognitive impairment. Med Care. 2020;58(9):842-849. doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001363
American College of Surgeons (ACS). ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Accessed July 20, 2021. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314(7080):572, doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
Shepherd-Banigan M, Sherman SR, Lindquist JH, et al. Family caregivers of veterans experience high levels of burden, distress, and financial strain. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(11):2675-2683. doi:10.1111/jgs.16767
Wolff JL, Freedman VA, Mulcahy JF, Kasper JD. Family caregivers’ experiences with health care workers in the care of older adults with activity limitations. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919866. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19866
Downey E, Olds DM. Comparison of documentation on inpatient discharge and ambulatory end-of-visit summaries. J Healthc Qual. 2021;43(3):e43-e52. doi:10.1097/jhq.0000000000000269
Brooke BS, Goodney PP, Kraiss LW, Gottlieb DJ, Samore MH, Finlayson SRG. Readmission destination and risk of mortality after major surgery: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):884-895. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60087-3
Burgdorf JG, Arbaje AI, Stuart EA, Wolff JL. Unmet family caregiver training needs associated with acute care utilization during home health care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(7):1887-1895. doi:10.1111/jgs.17138
Burgdorf JG, Fabius CD, Riffin C, Wolff JL. Receipt of posthospitalization care training among Medicare beneficiaries’ family caregivers. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211806. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1806
Griffin JM, Meis LA, MacDonald R, et al. Effectiveness of family and caregiver interventions on patient outcomes in adults with cancer: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(9):1274-1282. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2873-2
Yeo TP, Fogg RW, Shimada A, et al. The imperative of assessing quality of life in patients presenting to a pancreaticobiliary surgery clinic. Ann Surg. 2021;277(1):e136-e143. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005049
Wolff JL, Mulcahy J, Roth DL, et al. Long-term nursing home entry: a prognostic model for older adults with a family or unpaid caregiver. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(10):1887-1894. doi:10.1111/jgs.15447
Schulz R, Eden J, eds. Committee on Family Caregiving for Older Adults, et al. Families Caring for an Aging America. National Academies Press (US); 2016.