Ten technical aspects of baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients without glenoid bone loss: a systematic review.

Arthroplasty Bone screws Glenoid cavity Replacement Risk factors Shoulder

Journal

Clinics in shoulder and elbow
ISSN: 2288-8721
Titre abrégé: Clin Shoulder Elb
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101658558

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 17 06 2023
accepted: 17 08 2023
medline: 27 12 2023
pubmed: 27 12 2023
entrez: 26 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence on the following 10 technical aspects of glenoid baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA): screw insertion angles; screw orientation; screw quantity; screw length; screw type; baseplate tilt; baseplate position; baseplate version and rotation; baseplate design; and anatomical safe zones. Five literature libraries were searched for eligible clinical, cadaver, biomechanical, virtual planning, and finite element analysis studies. Studies including patients >16 years old in which at least one of the ten abovementioned technical aspects was assessed were suitable for analysis. We excluded studies of patients with: glenoid bone loss; bony increased offset-reversed shoulder arthroplasty; rTSA with bone grafts; and augmented baseplates. Quality assessment was performed for each included study. Sixty-two studies were included, of which 41 were experimental studies (13 cadaver, 10 virtual planning, 11 biomechanical, and 7 finite element studies) and 21 were clinical studies (12 retrospective cohorts and 9 case-control studies). Overall, the quality of included studies was moderate or high. The majority of studies agreed upon the use of a divergent screw fixation pattern, fixation with four screws (to reduce micromotions), and inferior positioning in neutral or anteversion. A general consensus was not reached on the other technical aspects. Most surgical aspects of baseplate fixation can be decided without affecting fixation strength. There is not a single strategy that provides the best outcome. Therefore, guidelines should cover multiple surgical options that can achieve adequate baseplate fixation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38147872
pii: cise.2023.00493
doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.00493
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Reinier W A Spek (RWA)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Center, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Lotje A Hoogervorst (LA)

Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Data Sciences and Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Rob C Brink (RC)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jan W Schoones (JW)

Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Derek F P van Deurzen (DFP)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Michel P J van den Bekerom (MPJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Shoulder and Elbow Expertise Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH