Multiple Sclerosis and Family Planning: A Survey Study of the Patient Experience.


Journal

Neurology. Clinical practice
ISSN: 2163-0402
Titre abrégé: Neurol Clin Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101577149

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 27 06 2023
accepted: 04 11 2023
medline: 27 12 2023
pubmed: 27 12 2023
entrez: 27 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly affects women in their childbearing years, necessitating discussion between patients and their MS treatment team around the issues of family planning, pregnancy, and postpartum experiences. This study assessed the impact of a diagnosis of MS on women's reproductive decision-making and on their perception of counseling received surrounding pregnancy. It also sought to evaluate trends in pregnancy and postpartum experiences and determine whether experiences differed by race, ethnicity, and zip code. Women with an MS diagnosis seen at the University of Virginia MS Clinic or at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) MS Clinic were invited to participate in a survey study. MS disease and pregnancy history, and, when appropriate, reasons for pregnancy avoidance were collected. Respondents who had >1 pregnancy following MS diagnosis were asked to evaluate the counseling they received from medical professionals and to share their pregnancy experiences including complications during pregnancy, delivery outcomes, and postpartum experience including breastfeeding. Of the 280 respondents, 76.6% were currently receiving MS specialty care. Most of them (79.3%) had not been pregnant following MS diagnosis. Of them, 20.1% indicated that this decision was driven by MS-related concerns: MS worsening with pregnancy (47%); ability to care for child secondary to MS (35%); passing MS onto child (19%); stopping disease-modifying therapies to attempt pregnancy (14%); lack of knowledge about options for pregnancy and MS (9%). Women with a more recent estimated decade of pregnancy were more likely to report neurologist counseling regarding MS and pregnancy (pregnancy before 2000: 40%, 2000-2010: 64.7%, 2010- present: 83.3%; χ Over the past few decades, women with MS have received a wide range of evolving guidance surrounding family planning, pregnancy, and postpartum care. Survey data suggest improvements in MS/pregnancy counseling and medical management in recent years, which may be driven by an increase in research in the field. There remains an important need and opportunity to improve counseling of women with MS who are considering pregnancy.

Sections du résumé

Background and Objectives UNASSIGNED
Multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly affects women in their childbearing years, necessitating discussion between patients and their MS treatment team around the issues of family planning, pregnancy, and postpartum experiences. This study assessed the impact of a diagnosis of MS on women's reproductive decision-making and on their perception of counseling received surrounding pregnancy. It also sought to evaluate trends in pregnancy and postpartum experiences and determine whether experiences differed by race, ethnicity, and zip code.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Women with an MS diagnosis seen at the University of Virginia MS Clinic or at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) MS Clinic were invited to participate in a survey study. MS disease and pregnancy history, and, when appropriate, reasons for pregnancy avoidance were collected. Respondents who had >1 pregnancy following MS diagnosis were asked to evaluate the counseling they received from medical professionals and to share their pregnancy experiences including complications during pregnancy, delivery outcomes, and postpartum experience including breastfeeding.
Results UNASSIGNED
Of the 280 respondents, 76.6% were currently receiving MS specialty care. Most of them (79.3%) had not been pregnant following MS diagnosis. Of them, 20.1% indicated that this decision was driven by MS-related concerns: MS worsening with pregnancy (47%); ability to care for child secondary to MS (35%); passing MS onto child (19%); stopping disease-modifying therapies to attempt pregnancy (14%); lack of knowledge about options for pregnancy and MS (9%). Women with a more recent estimated decade of pregnancy were more likely to report neurologist counseling regarding MS and pregnancy (pregnancy before 2000: 40%, 2000-2010: 64.7%, 2010- present: 83.3%; χ
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Over the past few decades, women with MS have received a wide range of evolving guidance surrounding family planning, pregnancy, and postpartum care. Survey data suggest improvements in MS/pregnancy counseling and medical management in recent years, which may be driven by an increase in research in the field. There remains an important need and opportunity to improve counseling of women with MS who are considering pregnancy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38148835
doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200222
pii: CPJ-2023-000312
pmc: PMC10751018
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e200222

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

J.N. Brenton served as a consultant for Cycle Pharmaceuticals and is funded by the NIH/NINDS grant #K23NS116225; R. Bove receives research support from the NMSS Harry Weaver Award, NIH, DOD and from Biogen, Novartis, and Roche Genentech. She has received fees for consulting or advisory boards from Alexion, Horizon, Janssen, and TG Therapeutics; M.D. Goldman has received consulting fees from Alexion, Genentech, Horizon, and Novartis. M.D. Goldman serves on DSMB for Anokion and Immunic. All other authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.

Auteurs

Erin E Kelly (EE)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

Casey Engel (C)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

Rylan Pearsall (R)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

J Nicholas Brenton (JN)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

Riley Bove (R)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

Unsong Oh (U)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

Myla D Goldman (MD)

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).

Classifications MeSH