Associations between dimensions of the social environment and cardiometabolic risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardiovascular diseases Deprivation Exposome Metabolic diseases Social context Social determinants of health Social epidemiology Social networking Socioeconomic factors

Journal

SSM - population health
ISSN: 2352-8273
Titre abrégé: SSM Popul Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678841

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 03 08 2023
revised: 27 10 2023
accepted: 11 11 2023
medline: 27 12 2023
pubmed: 27 12 2023
entrez: 27 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The social environment (SE), including social contacts, norms and support, is an understudied element of the living environment which impacts health. We aim to comprehensively summarize the evidence on the association between the SE and risk factors of cardiometabolic disease (CMD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on studies published in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to 16 February 2021. Studies that used a risk factor of CMD, e.g., HbA1c or blood pressure, as outcome and social environmental factors such as area-level deprivation or social network size as independent variables were included. Titles and abstracts were screened in duplicate. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data appraisal and extraction were based on the study protocol published in PROSPERO. Data were synthesized through vote counting and meta-analyses. From the 7521 records screened, 168 studies reported 1050 associations were included in this review. Four meta-analyses based on 24 associations suggested that an unfavorable social environment was associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic risk factors, with three of them being statistically significant. For example, individuals that experienced more economic and social disadvantage had a higher "CVD risk scores" (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.35 to 1.84). Of the 458 associations included in the vote counting, 323 (71%) pointed towards unfavorable social environments being associated with higher CMD risk. Higher economic and social disadvantage seem to contribute to unfavorable CMD risk factor profiles, while evidence for other dimensions of the social environment is limited.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38148999
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101559
pii: S2352-8273(23)00224-0
pmc: PMC10749911
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

101559

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Taymara C Abreu (TC)

Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Upstream Team, the Netherlands.

Joreintje D Mackenbach (JD)

Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Upstream Team, the Netherlands.

Fleur Heuvelman (F)

Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.

Linda J Schoonmade (LJ)

University Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.

Joline W J Beulens (JWJ)

Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
Upstream Team, the Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH