Can we increase the value of data from bladder diaries? International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society 2023.
LUTS
assessment
bladder diaries
challenges
compliance
e-healthcare
validity
Journal
Neurourology and urodynamics
ISSN: 1520-6777
Titre abrégé: Neurourol Urodyn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8303326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2023
27 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
09
12
2023
accepted:
13
12
2023
medline:
27
12
2023
pubmed:
27
12
2023
entrez:
27
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Bladder diaries represent a fundamental component in the assessment of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. Nevertheless, their importance often remains underappreciated and undervalued within clinical practice. This paper aims to conduct a comprehensive review of the existing literature concerning the utility of bladder diaries, underscore the criticality of their precision, elucidate the factors contributing to noncompliance with bladder diary completion, and investigate potential strategies for enhancing patient compliance. A review of the English-language scientific literature available in the domains of Medline, Embase, Emcare, Midirs, and Cinahl was conducted. This was supplemented by discussion at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society Proposal session to define knowledge and identify gaps in knowledge surrounding the utility of bladder diaries. The existing evidence and outcome of the relevant discussion held in the meeting are presented. Bladder diaries (BD) serve to characterize the nature and severity of storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and provide an objective record of an individual's urination patterns. They aid in the refinement and customization of treatment strategies based on the clinical responses documented in the diary, optimizing treatment outcomes. Notably, both BD and urodynamic studies (UDS) play complementary yet distinct roles in LUTS evaluation. BD offers a more comprehensive and accessible approach to assessing specific storage LUTS, particularly due to their affordability and widespread availability, especially in resource-limited settings. Nevertheless, the absence of a standardized BD format across global healthcare systems presents a significant challenge. Despite being recognized as reliable, noninvasive, validated, and cost-effective tools for evaluating patients with LUTS, the implementation and completion of BD have proven to be complex. The introduction of automated bladder diaries heralds an era of precise, real-time data collection, potentially enhancing the patient-clinician relationship. Completion of bladder diaries depends on an array of individual, social, and healthcare-specific factors. Compliance with bladder diary completion could be enhanced with clear instructions, patient education, regular follow-ups and positive re-enforcement. This study has identified four critical areas for future research: Addressing healthcare disparities between affluent and developing nations, enhancing the current functionality and effectiveness of bladder diaries, exploring the feasibility of incorporating bladder diaries into the treatment and education process and improving the quality and functionality of existing bladder diaries. Bladder diaries play a pivotal role in the evaluation and management of patients with LUTS, providing a holistic perspective. When their complete potential is harnessed, they have the capacity to revolutionize the paradigm of LUTS management, ushering in a patient-centered era of care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Bladder diaries represent a fundamental component in the assessment of patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. Nevertheless, their importance often remains underappreciated and undervalued within clinical practice. This paper aims to conduct a comprehensive review of the existing literature concerning the utility of bladder diaries, underscore the criticality of their precision, elucidate the factors contributing to noncompliance with bladder diary completion, and investigate potential strategies for enhancing patient compliance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A review of the English-language scientific literature available in the domains of Medline, Embase, Emcare, Midirs, and Cinahl was conducted. This was supplemented by discussion at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society Proposal session to define knowledge and identify gaps in knowledge surrounding the utility of bladder diaries. The existing evidence and outcome of the relevant discussion held in the meeting are presented.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Bladder diaries (BD) serve to characterize the nature and severity of storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and provide an objective record of an individual's urination patterns. They aid in the refinement and customization of treatment strategies based on the clinical responses documented in the diary, optimizing treatment outcomes. Notably, both BD and urodynamic studies (UDS) play complementary yet distinct roles in LUTS evaluation. BD offers a more comprehensive and accessible approach to assessing specific storage LUTS, particularly due to their affordability and widespread availability, especially in resource-limited settings. Nevertheless, the absence of a standardized BD format across global healthcare systems presents a significant challenge. Despite being recognized as reliable, noninvasive, validated, and cost-effective tools for evaluating patients with LUTS, the implementation and completion of BD have proven to be complex. The introduction of automated bladder diaries heralds an era of precise, real-time data collection, potentially enhancing the patient-clinician relationship. Completion of bladder diaries depends on an array of individual, social, and healthcare-specific factors. Compliance with bladder diary completion could be enhanced with clear instructions, patient education, regular follow-ups and positive re-enforcement. This study has identified four critical areas for future research: Addressing healthcare disparities between affluent and developing nations, enhancing the current functionality and effectiveness of bladder diaries, exploring the feasibility of incorporating bladder diaries into the treatment and education process and improving the quality and functionality of existing bladder diaries.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Bladder diaries play a pivotal role in the evaluation and management of patients with LUTS, providing a holistic perspective. When their complete potential is harnessed, they have the capacity to revolutionize the paradigm of LUTS management, ushering in a patient-centered era of care.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
NICE. Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women: Management. NICE guideline; 2019. Accessed July 11, 2023. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng123
Drake MJ. Fundamentals of terminology in lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S6):S13-S19. doi:10.1002/NAU.23768
Enemchukwu EA, Subak LL, Markland A. Barriers and facilitators to overactive bladder therapy adherence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(8):1983-1992. doi:10.1002/NAU.24936
Abrams P, Andersson KE, Apostolidis A, et al. 6th international consultation on incontinence. Recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2271-2272. doi:10.1002/NAU.23551
Blaivas JG, Li ESW, Dayan L, et al. Overactive bladder phenotypes: development and preliminary data. Can J Urol. 2021;28(3):10699-10704.
Naoemova I, De Wachter S, Wyndaele JJ. Comparison of sensation-related voiding patterns between continent and incontinent women: a study with a 3-day sensation-related bladder diary (SR-BD). Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:511-514.
Ito H, Abrams P, Lewis AL, et al. Use of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaires bladder diary in men seeking therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(1):66-74. doi:10.1016/J.EUF.2021.12.009
Naoemova I, De Wachter S, Wuyts FL, Wyndaele JJ. Reliability of the 24-h sensation-related bladder diary in women with urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(7):955-959. doi:10.1007/S00192-008-0565-3
Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A. Women overestimate daytime urinary frequency: the importance of the bladder diary. J Urol. 2009;181(5):2176-2180. doi:10.1016/J.JURO.2009.01.042
Naoemova I, De Wachter S, Wuyts FL, Wyndaele JJ. Do sensation-related bladder diaries differ between patients with urodynamically confirmed and non-objectivised urinary incontinence? Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(2):213-216. doi:10.1007/S00192-007-0420-Y
Flynn KE, Wiseman JB, Helmuth ME, et al. Comparing clinical bladder diaries and recalled patient reports for measuring lower urinary tract symptoms in the symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN). Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(8):1711-1721. doi:10.1002/NAU.25030
Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;10:233. doi:10.2147/PROM.S156291
EAU. Management of Non-neurogenic Male LUTS: Introduction: Uroweb. 2023. Accessed November 26, 2023. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts
Barr PJ, Berry SA, Gozansky WS, et al. No date for the PROM: the association between patient-reported health events and clinical coding in primary care. J Patient Report Outc. 2020;4(1):17. doi:10.1186/S41687-020-0183-5/TABLES/3
Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU Int. 2009;104(3):352-360. doi:10.1111/J.1464-410X.2009.08427.X
Hashim H, Abrams P. How should patients with an overactive bladder manipulate their fluid intake? BJU Int. 2008;102(1):62-66. doi:10.1111/J.1464-410X.2008.07463.X
Nitti VW. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2001;3(suppl 1):S2.
Booth J, Bliss D. Consensus statement on bladder training and bowel training. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(5):1234-1254. doi:10.1002/NAU.24345
Yoshida M, Takeda M, Gotoh M, Nagai S, Kurose T. Vibegron, a novel potent and selective β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Eur Urol. 2018;73(5):783-790. doi:10.1016/J.EURURO.2017.12.022
Staskin D, Frankel J, Varano S, Shortino D, Jankowich R, Mudd PN. International phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vibegron in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder: EMPOWUR. J Urol. 2020;204(2):316-324. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000807
Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, et al. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1438-1443. doi:10.1016/J.JURO.2009.12.036
Sahai A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Efficacy of botulinum toxin-A for treating idiopathic detrusor overactivity: results from a single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2007;177(6):2231-2236. doi:10.1016/J.JURO.2007.01.130
Homma Y, Ando T, Yoshida M, et al. Voiding and incontinence frequencies: variability of diary data and required diary length. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):204-209. doi:10.1002/NAU.10016
Suskind AM, Clemens JQ, Kaufman SR, et al. Patient perceptions of physical and emotional discomfort related to urodynamic testing: a questionnaire-based study in men and women with and without neurologic conditions. Urology. 2015;85(3):547-551. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.001
Serati M, Braga A, Rosier PFWM, de Wachter S, Uren A, Finazzi-Agrò E. Acceptability and perceived value of urodynamics from the patient perspective: a narrative review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(5):1065-1073. doi:10.1002/NAU.24932
Wyndaele JJ, Wachter SD. Cystometrical sensory data from a normal population: comparison of two groups of young healthy volunteers examined with 5 years interval. Eur Urol. 2002;42(1):34-38. doi:10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00221-X
Leron E, Weintraub AY, Mastrolia SA, Schwarzman P. Overactive bladder syndrome: evaluation and management. Curr Urol. 2018;11(3):117-125. doi:10.1159/000447205
Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrams KR, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(6):1-132. doi:10.3310/HTA10060
Hsiao SM, Lin HH. Feasibility and clinical implications of 3-day bladder diary derived classification of female storage lower urinary tract symptoms. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):20339. doi:10.1038/S41598-022-24539-1
Gammie A, Clarkson B, Constantinou C, et al. International continence society guidelines on urodynamic equipment performance. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(4):370-379. doi:10.1002/NAU.22546
Van Leijsen SAL, Kluivers KB, Mol BWJ, et al. Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetr Gynecol. 2013;121(5):999-1008. doi:10.1097/AOG.0B013E31828C68E3
Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1987-1997. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113595
Weber AM, Walters MD. Cost-effectiveness of urodynamic testing before surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(6):1338-1347. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.111251
Fritel X, Fauconnier A, Bader G, et al. Diagnosis and management of adult female stress urinary incontinence: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151:14-19. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.041
Bright E, Cotterill N, Drake M, Abrams P. Developing and validating the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire bladder diary. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):294-300. doi:10.1016/J.EURURO.2014.02.057
ICIQ. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Bladder Diary; ICIQ. 2014. Accessed October 2, 2023. https://iciq.net/iciq-bladder-diary
Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1015-1024. doi:10.1111/HEX.13254
Frost MH, Reeve BB, Liepa AM, Stauffer JW, Hays RD. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007;10(suppl 2):94. doi:10.1111/J.1524-4733.2007.00272.X
Bright E, Cotterill N, Drake M, Abrams P. Developing a validated urinary diary: phase 1. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(5):625-633. doi:10.1002/NAU.21254
NICE. Evidence: Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women: Management | Guidance; 2019. NICE.
Dmochowski RR, Sanders SW, Appell RA, Nitti VW, Davila GW. Bladder-health diaries: an assessment of 3-day vs 7-day entries. BJU Int. 2005;96(7):1049-1054. doi:10.1111/J.1464-410X.2005.05785.X
Mehta S, Geng B, Xu X, Harmanli O. Current state of bladder diary: a survey and review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(4):809-823. doi:10.1007/S00192-022-05398-W
Gammie A. Compliance to individualized recommendations based on an evidence based algorithm for behavioral management of lower urinary tract symptoms. J Wound Ostomy Contin Nurs. 2020;47(4):381-387. doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000662
Cameron AP, Wiseman JB, Smith AR, et al. Are three-day voiding diaries feasible and reliable? results from the symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction research network (LURN) cohort. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(8):2185-2193. doi:10.1002/NAU.24113
Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS. Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(12):791-798. doi:10.1046/J.1525-1497.1998.00242.X
Grenard JL, Munjas BA, Adams JL, et al. Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1175-1182. doi:10.1007/S11606-011-1704-Y
Pe Leve P, Pereira e Silva R, Lopes FA, et al. Impact of age, education level and occupation on the ability to use the ICIQ-bladder diary: results from A community cohort study using a predefined clinical history. Urology. 2021;153:113-118. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.006
Perrouin-Verbe MA, Drake MJ, Thomas L. The challenges of real-life bladder diary use and interpretation. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(1):11-17. doi:10.1016/J.EUF.2022.01.002
Gomes CM, Moromizato JKM, Ribeiro LS. Mobile health may improve evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2021;47(6):1195-1197. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0211.1
Improving Outcomes Through Personalised Medicine. Working at the Cutting Edge of Science to Improve Patients' Lives. 2017.
Digital Technology Assessment Criteria (DTAC). Key Tools and Information-NHS Transformation Directorate. 2021. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://transform.england.nhs.uk/key-tools-and-info/digital-technology-assessment-criteria-dtac/
Mangera A, Marzo A, Heron N, et al. Development of two electronic bladder diaries: a patient and healthcare professionals pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(7):1101-1109. doi:10.1002/NAU.22469
Mateu Arrom L, Peri Cusi L, Franco de Castro A, López-Fando L, Jiménez Cidre MÁ, Alcaraz Asensio A. Development and feasibility assessment of a 3 day electronic bladder diary as an app for smart-phone. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1717-1723. doi:10.1002/NAU.23494
López-Fando L, Calleja Hermosa P, Hajebrahimi S, et al. Female LUTS adaptations to COVID era: lessons learned from the ICS TURNOVER (Transition of fUnctional uRology to New COVID ERa). Continence. 2022;4:100521. doi:10.1016/J.CONT.2022.100521
Arcaya MC, Arcaya AL, Subramanian SV. Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):27106. doi:10.3402/GHA.V8.27106
Bergmo TS. How to measure costs and benefits of ehealth interventions: an overview of methods and frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e254. doi:10.2196/JMIR.4521
Krebs P, Duncan DT. Health app use among US mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(4):e101. doi:10.2196/MHEALTH.4924
Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(283):283-286. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487