ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for Communication: Radiation Oncology.
Journal
American journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 1537-453X
Titre abrégé: Am J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8207754
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Dec 2023
25 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
27
12
2023
pubmed:
27
12
2023
entrez:
27
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the American Radium Society (ARS). Timely, accurate, and effective communications are critical to quality and safety in contemporary medical practices. Radiation oncology incorporates the science and technology of complex, integrated treatment delivery and the art of providing care to individual patients. Through written physical and/or electronic reports and direct communication, radiation oncologists convey their knowledge and evaluation regarding patient care, clinical workup, and treatment provided to others in the management of the patient. Applicable practice parameters need to be revised periodically regarding medical record documentation for professional and technical components of services delivered. This practice parameter was developed and revised according to the process described under the heading "The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards" on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Both societies have reviewed and approved the document. This practice parameter addresses radiation oncology communications in general, including (a) medical record, (b) electronic, and (c) doctor-patient communications, as well as specific documentation for radiation oncology reports such as (a) consultation, (b) clinical treatment management notes (including inpatient communication), (c) treatment (completion) summary, and (d) follow-up visits. The radiation oncologist's participation in the multidisciplinary management of patients is reflected in timely, medically appropriate, and informative communication with patients, caregivers, referring physician, and other members of the health care team. The ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for Communication: Radiation Oncology is an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate communication regarding radiation oncology care for patients.
Sections du résumé
AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND
OBJECTIVE
This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the American Radium Society (ARS). Timely, accurate, and effective communications are critical to quality and safety in contemporary medical practices. Radiation oncology incorporates the science and technology of complex, integrated treatment delivery and the art of providing care to individual patients. Through written physical and/or electronic reports and direct communication, radiation oncologists convey their knowledge and evaluation regarding patient care, clinical workup, and treatment provided to others in the management of the patient. Applicable practice parameters need to be revised periodically regarding medical record documentation for professional and technical components of services delivered.
METHODS
METHODS
This practice parameter was developed and revised according to the process described under the heading "The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards" on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the ARS. Both societies have reviewed and approved the document.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This practice parameter addresses radiation oncology communications in general, including (a) medical record, (b) electronic, and (c) doctor-patient communications, as well as specific documentation for radiation oncology reports such as (a) consultation, (b) clinical treatment management notes (including inpatient communication), (c) treatment (completion) summary, and (d) follow-up visits.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The radiation oncologist's participation in the multidisciplinary management of patients is reflected in timely, medically appropriate, and informative communication with patients, caregivers, referring physician, and other members of the health care team. The ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for Communication: Radiation Oncology is an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate communication regarding radiation oncology care for patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38149838
doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001078
pii: 00000421-990000000-00163
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
P.W.: GenesisCare: Employee Nanocan Therapeutics, Inc, Princeton, NJ: Unpaid Advisory Board member; J.B.: Advisory boards for Galera Therapeutics and Castle Biosciences; W.S.: Carl Zeiss, honoraria, and travel expenses for DSMB service. ACR Radiation Oncology Commission; N.R.S.: Rakuten-Medical, Inc., medical director; South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, locum. Volunteer relationships: American College of Radiology, Chair of Practice Parameters, Radiation Oncology, and Chair of CARROS Quality and Safety Committee; ASTRO, Chair of Safety Scientific Committee. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Emanuel LL, Richter J. The consultant and the patient-physician relationship. A trilateral deliberative model. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1785–1790.
American College of Radiology. ACR–ASTRO practice parameter for radiation oncology. 2023. Accessed December 20, 2017. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/radonc.pdf?la=en
Bhatnagar AK, Land SR, Shogan A, et al. What do patients want from their radiation oncologist? Initial results from a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:1527–1533.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–2226.
Mazzini MJ, Glode LM. Internet oncology: increased benefit and risk for patients and oncologists. Hematol/Oncol Clin North Am. 2001;15:583–592.
Ong LM, Visser MR, Lammes FB, et al. Effect of providing cancer patients with the audiotaped initial consultation on satisfaction, recall, and quality of life: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3052–3060.
Reilly MO, Cahill M, Perry IJ. Writing to patients: ‘putting the patient in the picture’. Irish Med J. 2005;98:58–60.
White P, Singleton A, Jones R. Copying referral letters to patients: the views of patients, patient representatives and doctors. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55:94–98.
American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM–SIIM practice parameter for electronic medical information privacy and security. 2019. Accessed February 4, 2022. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/elec-info-privacy.pdf?la=en
American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. Lippincott-Raven; 2002.
American College of Radiology. ACR–ARS practice parameter on informed consent radiation oncology. 2022. Accessed October 5, 2022. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/InformedConsent-RO.pdf
Barnes EA, Chow E, Andersson L, et al. Communication with referring physicians in a palliative radiotherapy clinic. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:669–673.
Barnes EA, Hanson J, Neumann CM, et al. Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2902–2907.
Services USDoHaH. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0. 2017. Accessed October 5, 2022. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_5×7.pdf