Understanding Gaps in Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: A Systematic Scoping Review.


Journal

JMIR public health and surveillance
ISSN: 2369-2960
Titre abrégé: JMIR Public Health Surveill
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101669345

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 27 12 2023
pubmed: 27 12 2023
entrez: 27 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hypertension and diabetes are global health challenges requiring effective management to mitigate their considerable burden. The key to successful management of hypertension and diabetes requires the completion of a sequence of stages, collectively termed the care cascade. This scoping review aimed to describe the characteristics of studies on hypertension and diabetes care cascade and identify potential interventions as well as factors that impact each stage of the care cascade. The method of this scoping review is guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We systematically searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science using terms pertinent to hypertension, diabetes and specific stages of the care cascade. Articles published after 2011 and included all studies that described the completion of at least one stage of the care cascade of hypertension and diabetes were included in this scoping review. Study selection was independently performed by two paired authors. Descriptive statistics were used to elucidate key patterns and trends. Inductive content analysis was performed to generate themes regarding barriers and facilitators to improving the care cascade in hypertension and diabetes management. A total of 128 studies were included, with 42% conducted in high-income countries. Of them, 47 (36.7%) focused on hypertension care while 63 (49.2%) on diabetes, and only 18 (14.1%) articles reported on the care of both diseases. The majority (75%) were observational in design. Cascade stages documented in the literature were awareness, screening, diagnosis, linked to care, treatment, adherence to medication and control. Most studies focus on the stages of treatment and control while a relative paucity of studies examine the stages before treatment initiation (59% vs. 41%). A wide spectrum of interventions aimed at enhancing hypertension and diabetes care cascade were identified. The analysis unveiled a multitude of individual-level and system-level factors influencing the successful completion of cascade sequence in both high-income and low and middle-income settings. This review offers a comprehensive understanding of hypertension and diabetes management, emphasising the pivotal factors that impact each stage of care. Future research should focus on upstream cascade stages and context-specific interventions to optimise patient retention and care outcomes. Not applicable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hypertension and diabetes are global health challenges requiring effective management to mitigate their considerable burden. The key to successful management of hypertension and diabetes requires the completion of a sequence of stages, collectively termed the care cascade.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This scoping review aimed to describe the characteristics of studies on hypertension and diabetes care cascade and identify potential interventions as well as factors that impact each stage of the care cascade.
METHODS METHODS
The method of this scoping review is guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework. We systematically searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science using terms pertinent to hypertension, diabetes and specific stages of the care cascade. Articles published after 2011 and included all studies that described the completion of at least one stage of the care cascade of hypertension and diabetes were included in this scoping review. Study selection was independently performed by two paired authors. Descriptive statistics were used to elucidate key patterns and trends. Inductive content analysis was performed to generate themes regarding barriers and facilitators to improving the care cascade in hypertension and diabetes management.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 128 studies were included, with 42% conducted in high-income countries. Of them, 47 (36.7%) focused on hypertension care while 63 (49.2%) on diabetes, and only 18 (14.1%) articles reported on the care of both diseases. The majority (75%) were observational in design. Cascade stages documented in the literature were awareness, screening, diagnosis, linked to care, treatment, adherence to medication and control. Most studies focus on the stages of treatment and control while a relative paucity of studies examine the stages before treatment initiation (59% vs. 41%). A wide spectrum of interventions aimed at enhancing hypertension and diabetes care cascade were identified. The analysis unveiled a multitude of individual-level and system-level factors influencing the successful completion of cascade sequence in both high-income and low and middle-income settings.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This review offers a comprehensive understanding of hypertension and diabetes management, emphasising the pivotal factors that impact each stage of care. Future research should focus on upstream cascade stages and context-specific interventions to optimise patient retention and care outcomes.
CLINICALTRIAL BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38149840
doi: 10.2196/51802
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Jie Wang (J)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Fangqin Tan (F)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Zhenzhong Wang (Z)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Yiwen Yu (Y)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Jingsong Yang (J)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Yueqing Wang (Y)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Ruitai Shao (R)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, CN.

Xuejun Yin (X)

School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 31 Bei ji ge san tiao, Dongdan, Beijing, CN.
The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, AU.

Classifications MeSH