Comparison of Home and Office Blood Pressure Devices in the Clinical Setting.

Home blood pressure monitoring Pharmacist Self-measured blood pressure Validation

Journal

American journal of hypertension
ISSN: 1941-7225
Titre abrégé: Am J Hypertens
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 12 05 2023
medline: 27 12 2023
pubmed: 27 12 2023
entrez: 27 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring is increasingly used for remote hypertension management, but the real-world performance of home blood pressure (BP) devices is unknown. We examined BP measurements from patients' home devices using the American Medical Association's (AMA) Self-Measured Blood Pressure (SMBP) Device Accuracy Test tool. Patients at a single internal medicine clinic underwent up to five seated, same-arm BP readings using a home device and an automated BP device (Omron HEM-907XL). Following the AMA's 3-step protocol, we used the patient's home device for the first, second, and fourth measurements and the office device for the third and fifth (if needed) measurements. Device agreement failure was defined as an absolute difference in systolic BP >10 mm Hg between the home and office devices in either of two confirmatory steps. Performance was examined by brand (Omron vs non-Omron). Moreover, we examined patient factors associated with agreement failure via logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics. We evaluated 152 patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years, 58% women, 31% Black) seen between October 2020 and November 2021. Device agreement failure occurred in 22.4% (95% CI: 16.4%, 29.7%) of devices tested, including 19.1% among Omron devices and 27.6% among non-Omron devices (P = 0.23). No patient characteristics were associated with agreement failure. Over one-fifth of home devices did not agree based on the AMA SMBP device accuracy protocol. These findings confirm the importance of office-based device comparisons to ensure the accuracy of home BP monitoring.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring is increasingly used for remote hypertension management, but the real-world performance of home blood pressure (BP) devices is unknown. We examined BP measurements from patients' home devices using the American Medical Association's (AMA) Self-Measured Blood Pressure (SMBP) Device Accuracy Test tool.
METHODS METHODS
Patients at a single internal medicine clinic underwent up to five seated, same-arm BP readings using a home device and an automated BP device (Omron HEM-907XL). Following the AMA's 3-step protocol, we used the patient's home device for the first, second, and fourth measurements and the office device for the third and fifth (if needed) measurements. Device agreement failure was defined as an absolute difference in systolic BP >10 mm Hg between the home and office devices in either of two confirmatory steps. Performance was examined by brand (Omron vs non-Omron). Moreover, we examined patient factors associated with agreement failure via logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics.
RESULTS RESULTS
We evaluated 152 patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years, 58% women, 31% Black) seen between October 2020 and November 2021. Device agreement failure occurred in 22.4% (95% CI: 16.4%, 29.7%) of devices tested, including 19.1% among Omron devices and 27.6% among non-Omron devices (P = 0.23). No patient characteristics were associated with agreement failure.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Over one-fifth of home devices did not agree based on the AMA SMBP device accuracy protocol. These findings confirm the importance of office-based device comparisons to ensure the accuracy of home BP monitoring.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38150380
pii: 7502666
doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad120
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

Auteurs

Stephen P Juraschek (SP)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Medha Vyavahare (M)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Jennifer L Cluett (JL)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Ruth-Alma Turkson-Ocran (RA)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Kenneth J Mukamal (KJ)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Anthony M Ishak (AM)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Healthcare Associates, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Classifications MeSH