Effectiveness and safety of second-generation antipsychotics for psychiatric disorders apart from schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meta-analysis Placebo Randomized controlled trials Second-generation antipsychotics

Journal

Psychiatry research
ISSN: 1872-7123
Titre abrégé: Psychiatry Res
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7911385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 10 08 2023
revised: 21 11 2023
accepted: 25 11 2023
medline: 28 12 2023
pubmed: 28 12 2023
entrez: 27 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used in treating schizophrenia and related disorders, also other mental disorders. However, the efficacy and safety of SGAs for treating other mental disorders is unclear. A systematic literature search for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of 11 SGAs for treating 18 mental disorders apart from schizophrenia were carried out from database inception to April 3, 2022. The primary outcome was the mean change in the total score for different mental disorders. The secondary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of response, remission rates and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs). A total of 181 studies (N = 65,480) were included. All SGAs showed significant effects in treating other mental disorders compared with placebo, except autistic disorder and dementia. Aripiprazole is the most effective treatment for bipolar mania [effect size = -0.90, 95% CI: -1.59, -0.21] and Tourette's disorder [effect size = -0.80, 95% CI: -1.14, -0.45], olanzapine for bipolar depression [effect size = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.32, -0.39] and post-traumatic stress disorder [effect size = -0.98, 95% CI: -1.55, -0.41], lurasidone for depression [effect size = -0.66, 95% CI: -0.82, -0.50], quetiapine for anxiety [effect size = -1.20, 95% CI: -1.96, -0.43], sleep disorders [effect size = -1.2, 95% CI: -1.97, -0.58], and delirium [effect size = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.70, -0.03], and risperidone for obsessive-compulsive disorder [effect size = -2.37, 95% CI: -3.25, -1.49], respectively. For safety, AE items for each SGAs was different. Interestingly, we found that some AEs of OLZ, QTP, RIS and PALI have significant palliative effects on some symptoms. Significant differences in the efficacy and safety of different SGAs for treatment of other mental disorders should be considered for choosing the drug and for the balance between efficacy and tolerability for the specific patient.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38150810
pii: S0165-1781(23)00587-5
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115637
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

115637

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Xue-Zhu Feng (XZ)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China; Department of Neurobiology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.

Zhe Li (Z)

School of Social Development and Public Policy (SSDPP), Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Zi-Yi Li (ZY)

Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Translation Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.

Ke Wang (K)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.

Xuan Tan (X)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China; Department of Neurobiology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.

Yu-Yu Zhao (YY)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China; Department of Neurobiology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.

Wei-Feng Mi (WF)

Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Centre for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Peking University, Beijing, China.

Wei-Li Zhu (WL)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.

Yan-Ping Bao (YP)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China.

Lin Lu (L)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China; Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Centre for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Peking University, Beijing, China; Peking-Tsinghua Centre for Life Sciences and PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China; Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Mood Cognitive Disorder, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2018RU006), Beijing, China.. Electronic address: linlu@bjmu.edu.cn.

Su-Xia Li (SX)

National Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence Research, Peking University, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China. Electronic address: li313@bjmu.edu.cn.

Classifications MeSH