Association of neighborhood gentrification with prostate cancer and immune markers in African American and European American men.
health disparity
immune markers
minority and vulnerable populations
mortality
neighborhood
prostate cancer
Journal
Cancer medicine
ISSN: 2045-7634
Titre abrégé: Cancer Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595310
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2023
27 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
11
10
2023
received:
27
07
2023
accepted:
24
10
2023
medline:
28
12
2023
pubmed:
28
12
2023
entrez:
28
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Prior studies showed that neighborhood deprivation increases the risk of lethal prostate cancer. However, the role of neighborhood gentrification in prostate cancer development and outcome remains poorly understood. We examined the relationships of gentrification with prostate cancer and serum proteome-defined inflammation and immune function in a diverse cohort. The case-control study included 769 cases [405 African American (AA), 364 European American (EA) men] and 1023 controls (479 AA and 544 EA), with 219 all-cause and 59 prostate cancer-specific deaths among cases. Geocodes were linked to a neighborhood gentrification index (NGI) derived from US Census data. Cox and logistic regression, and MANOVA, were used to determine associations between NGI, as continuous or quintiles (Q), and outcomes. Adjusting for individual socioeconomic status (SES), continuous NGI was positively associated with prostate cancer among all men (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14). AA and low-income men experienced the highest odds of prostate cancer when residing in tracts with moderate gentrification, whereas EA men experienced reduced odds of regional/metastatic cancer with increased gentrification in SES-adjusted analyses. Continuous NGI also associated with mortality among men presenting with localized disease and low-income men in SES-adjusted Cox regression analyses. NGI was not associated with serum proteome-defined chemotaxis, inflammation, and tumor immunity suppression. Findings show that neighborhood gentrification associates with prostate cancer and mortality in this diverse population albeit associations were heterogenous within subgroups. The observations suggest that changing neighborhood socioeconomic environments may affect prostate cancer risk and outcome, likely through multifactorial mechanisms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prior studies showed that neighborhood deprivation increases the risk of lethal prostate cancer. However, the role of neighborhood gentrification in prostate cancer development and outcome remains poorly understood. We examined the relationships of gentrification with prostate cancer and serum proteome-defined inflammation and immune function in a diverse cohort.
METHODS
METHODS
The case-control study included 769 cases [405 African American (AA), 364 European American (EA) men] and 1023 controls (479 AA and 544 EA), with 219 all-cause and 59 prostate cancer-specific deaths among cases. Geocodes were linked to a neighborhood gentrification index (NGI) derived from US Census data. Cox and logistic regression, and MANOVA, were used to determine associations between NGI, as continuous or quintiles (Q), and outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Adjusting for individual socioeconomic status (SES), continuous NGI was positively associated with prostate cancer among all men (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.14). AA and low-income men experienced the highest odds of prostate cancer when residing in tracts with moderate gentrification, whereas EA men experienced reduced odds of regional/metastatic cancer with increased gentrification in SES-adjusted analyses. Continuous NGI also associated with mortality among men presenting with localized disease and low-income men in SES-adjusted Cox regression analyses. NGI was not associated with serum proteome-defined chemotaxis, inflammation, and tumor immunity suppression.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Findings show that neighborhood gentrification associates with prostate cancer and mortality in this diverse population albeit associations were heterogenous within subgroups. The observations suggest that changing neighborhood socioeconomic environments may affect prostate cancer risk and outcome, likely through multifactorial mechanisms.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : ZIJ MD000010 to T.M.P.W.
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Tsodikov A, Gulati R, de Carvalho TM, et al. Is prostate cancer different in black men? Answers from 3 natural history models. Cancer. 2017;123(12):2312-2319. doi:10.1002/cncr.30687
Seewaldt VL, Winn RA. Residential racial and economic segregation and cancer mortality in the US-speaking out on inequality and injustice. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(1):126-127. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5272
Landrine H, Corral I, Lee JGL, Efird JT, Hall MB, Bess JJ. Residential segregation and racial cancer disparities: a systematic review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017;4(6):1195-1205. doi:10.1007/s40615-016-0326-9
Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186(1):125-145. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05333.x
Landrine H, Corral I. Separate and unequal: residential segregation and black health disparities. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(2):179-184.
Sorice KA, Fang CY, Wiese D, et al. Systematic review of neighborhood socioeconomic indices studied across the cancer control continuum. Cancer Med. 2022;11(10):2125-2144. doi:10.1002/cam4.4601
Pichardo MS, Minas TZ, Pichardo CM, et al. Association of neighborhood deprivation with prostate cancer and immune markers in African American and European American men. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(1):e2251745. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51745
Gomez SL, Shariff-Marco S, DeRouen M, et al. The impact of neighborhood social and built environment factors across the cancer continuum: current research, methodological considerations, and future directions. Cancer. 2015;121(14):2314-2330. doi:10.1002/cncr.29345
Rebbeck TR. Conquering cancer disparities: new opportunities for cancer epidemiology, biomarker, and prevention research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(9):1569-1571. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-06-0613
Bhavsar NA, Kumar M, Richman L. Defining gentrification for epidemiologic research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233361
Cole HVS, Mehdipanah R, Gullón P, Triguero-Mas M. Breaking down and building up: gentrification, its drivers, and urban health inequality. Current Environ Health Rep. 2021;8(2):157-166. doi:10.1007/s40572-021-00309-5
Cole HVS, Franzosa E. Advancing urban health equity in the United States in an age of health care gentrification: a framework and research agenda. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12939-022-01669-6
Ding L, Hwang J, Divringi E. Gentrification and residential mobility in Philadelphia. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2016;61:38-51. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.004
Tulier ME, Reid C, Mujahid MS, Allen AM. "Clear action requires clear thinking": a systematic review of gentrification and health research in the United States. Health Place. 2019;59:102173. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102173
Kennedy M, Leonard P. Gentrification: practice and politics. Home Ownership Summit 2000 Research Series. Washington, DC. 2001.
Li BY. Now is the time: challenging resegregation and displacement in the age of hypergentrification. Fordham Law Rev. 2016;85:1189.
Schnake-Mahl AS, Jahn JL, Subramanian SV, Waters MC, Arcaya M. Gentrification, neighborhood change, and population health: a systematic review. J Urban Health. 2020;97(1):1-25. doi:10.1007/s11524-019-00400-1
Betancur JJ. The politics of gentrification: the case of west town in Chicago. Urban Aff Rev. 2002;37(6):780-814. doi:10.1177/107874037006002
Smith CJ, Dorsey TH, Tang W, Jordan SV, Loffredo CA, Ambs S. Aspirin use reduces the risk of aggressive prostate cancer and disease recurrence in African-American men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(6):845-853. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-1027
Kiely M, Milne GL, Minas TZ, et al. Urinary thromboxane B2 and lethal prostate cancer in African American men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;114:123-129. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab129
Geolytics. Neighborhood change database [NCDB] tract data from 1970-2010 [Online demographic data]. 2014.
Freeman L, Braconi F. Gentrification and displacement New York City in the 1990s. J Am Plann Assoc. 2004;70(1):39-52. doi:10.1080/01944360408976337
Huynh M, Maroko AR. Gentrification and preterm birth in New York City, 2008-2010. J Urban Health. 2014;91(1):211-220. doi:10.1007/s11524-013-9823-x
Linton SL, Cooper HLF, Kelley ME, et al. Cross-sectional association between ZIP code-level gentrification and homelessness among a large community-based sample of people who inject drugs in 19 US cities. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e013823. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013823
Minas TZ, Candia J, Dorsey TH, et al. Serum proteomics links suppression of tumor immunity to ancestry and lethal prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1759. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29235-2
Anguelovski I. Healthy food stores, greenlining and food gentrification: contesting new forms of privilege, displacement and locally unwanted land uses in racially mixed neighborhoods. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2015;39(6):1209-1230. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12299
Rucks-Ahidiana Z. Racial composition and trajectories of gentrification in the United States. Urban Studies. 2021;58(13):2721-2741. doi:10.1177/0042098020963853
Development USDoHaU, Research OoPDa. Displacement of lower-income families in urban areas report. 2018.
Byrne JP. Two cheers for gentrification. Howard Law J. 2002;46(3):405-432.
Mullenbach LE, Baker BL. Environmental justice, gentrification, and leisure: a systematic review and opportunities for the future. Leis Sci. 2020;42(5-6):430-447. doi:10.1080/01490400.2018.1458261
Cole HVS, Triguero-Mas M, Connolly JJT, Anguelovski I. Determining the health benefits of green space: does gentrification matter? Health Place. 2019;57:1-11. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.001
Schachner JN. Is gentrification a carcinogen? Neighborhood change and cancerous vehicle emissions in Los Angeles County. Hous Policy Debate. 2022;33:1-25. doi:10.1080/10511482.2022.2099936
Betancur J. Gentrification and community fabric in Chicago. Urban Stud. 2011;48(2):383-406. doi:10.1177/0042098009360680
Tran LD, Rice TH, Ong PM, Banerjee S, Liou J, Ponce NA. Impact of gentrification on adult mental health. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(3):432-444. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13264
Smith GS, Breakstone H, Dean LT, Thorpe RJ Jr. Impacts of gentrification on health in the US: a systematic review of the literature. J Urban Health. 2020;97(6):845-856. doi:10.1007/s11524-020-00448-4
Zhang D, Matthews CE, Powell-Wiley TM, Xiao Q. Ten-year change in neighborhood socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2019;125(4):610-617. doi:10.1002/cncr.31832
Smith GS, Thorpe RJ Jr. Gentrification: a priority for environmental justice and health equity research. Ethn Dis. 2020;30(3):509-512. doi:10.18865/ed.30.3.509
Patki S, Aquilina J, Thorne R, et al. A systematic review of patient race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and educational attainment in prostate cancer treatment randomised trials-is the evidence base applicable to the general patient population? Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023;54:56-64. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.015
Rundle A, Neckerman KM, Sheehan D, et al. A prospective study of socioeconomic status, prostate cancer screening and incidence among men at high risk for prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(2):297-303. doi:10.1007/s10552-012-0108-6
Barrett RE, Cho YI, Weaver KE, et al. Neighborhood change and distant metastasis at diagnosis of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(1):43-47. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.07.001
Xiao Q, Berrigan D, Powell-Wiley TM, Matthews CE. Ten-year change in neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and rates of total, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality in older US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(12):2642-2650. doi:10.1093/aje/kwy181
Yin D, Morris C, Allen M, Cress R, Bates J, Liu L. Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups? Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(10):1721-1730. doi:10.1007/s10552-010-9601-y
Poulson MR, Kenzik KM, Singh S, et al. Redlining, structural racism, and lung cancer screening disparities. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163(6):1920-1930.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.08.086
Lim S, Chan PY, Walters S, Culp G, Huynh M, Gould LH. Impact of residential displacement on healthcare access and mental health among original residents of gentrifying neighborhoods in New York City. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0190139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190139
Moses KA, Orom H, Brasel A, Gaddy J, Underwood W III. Racial/ethnic disparity in treatment for prostate cancer: does cancer severity matter? Urology. 2017;99:76-83. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.045
Sundi D, Faisal FA, Trock BJ, et al. Reclassification rates are higher among African American men than Caucasians on active surveillance. Urology. 2015;85(1):155-160. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.014
Vapiwala N, Miller D, Laventure B, et al. Stigma, beliefs and perceptions regarding prostate cancer among Black and Latino men and women. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):758. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10793-x
Lillard JW Jr, Moses KA, Mahal BA, George DJ. Racial disparities in Black men with prostate cancer: a literature review. Cancer. 2022;128(21):3787-3795. doi:10.1002/cncr.34433
Kinlock BL, Thorpe RJ Jr, Howard DL, et al. Racial disparity in time between first diagnosis and initial treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer Control. 2016;23(1):47-51. doi:10.1177/107327481602300108