Contact allergy in atopic dermatitis: A prospective study on prevalence, incriminated allergens and clinical insights.

allergic contact dermatitis atopic dermatitis patch test

Journal

Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Dec 2023
Historique:
revised: 10 12 2023
received: 25 08 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 28 12 2023
pubmed: 28 12 2023
entrez: 28 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The relationship between atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a matter of debate. The purpose of our study is to assess the frequency of ACD in patients with AD, the incriminated allergens and the potential risk factors. This is a prospective study, including cases of AD diagnosed based on Hanifin and Rajka's criteria. All patients were patch tested to the European baseline series and corticosteroid series. Ninety-three patients were included. Fifty-six patients (60.2%) had positive patch test results of which 71.4% were relevant. The most frequent allergens were: textile dye mix (24.7%), nickel (20.4%), cobalt (12.9%), isothiazolinone (8.6%), quanterium 15 (4.3%) and balsam of Peru (4.3%). Chromium, fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and PTBP were positive in three cases (3.2%). Two cases of allergy to corticoids were identified. Facial involvement and duration of AD were significantly associated with contact sensitization (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively). Avoidance of relevant allergens resulted in a statistically significant decrease in SCORAD (p < 0.001). ACD remains an important co-morbidity of AD. We observed a high frequency of ACD to textile dyes, isothiazolinones and fragrances. Avoidance of relevant allergens has resulted in an improvement of patients' skin symptoms.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The relationship between atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a matter of debate.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The purpose of our study is to assess the frequency of ACD in patients with AD, the incriminated allergens and the potential risk factors.
METHODS METHODS
This is a prospective study, including cases of AD diagnosed based on Hanifin and Rajka's criteria. All patients were patch tested to the European baseline series and corticosteroid series.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ninety-three patients were included. Fifty-six patients (60.2%) had positive patch test results of which 71.4% were relevant. The most frequent allergens were: textile dye mix (24.7%), nickel (20.4%), cobalt (12.9%), isothiazolinone (8.6%), quanterium 15 (4.3%) and balsam of Peru (4.3%). Chromium, fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and PTBP were positive in three cases (3.2%). Two cases of allergy to corticoids were identified. Facial involvement and duration of AD were significantly associated with contact sensitization (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively). Avoidance of relevant allergens resulted in a statistically significant decrease in SCORAD (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
ACD remains an important co-morbidity of AD. We observed a high frequency of ACD to textile dyes, isothiazolinones and fragrances. Avoidance of relevant allergens has resulted in an improvement of patients' skin symptoms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38151921
doi: 10.1111/cod.14494
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Silverberg JI. Public health burden and epidemiology of atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35(3):283-289.
Nassau S, Fonacier L. Allergic contact dermatitis. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104(1):61-76.
Simonsen AB, Johansen JD, Deleuran M, Mortz CG, Skov L, Sommerlund M. Children with atopic dermatitis may have unacknowledged contact allergies contributing to their skin symptoms. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(3):428-436.
Johnson H, Novack DE, Adler BL, Yu J. Can atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis coexist? Cutis. 2022;110(3):139-142.
Correa da Rosa J, Malajian D, Shemer A, et al. Patients with atopic dermatitis have attenuated and distinct contact hypersensitivity responses to common allergens in skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(3):712-720.
Bonamonte D, Hansel K, Romita P, et al. Contact allergy in children with and without atopic dermatitis: an Italian multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87(3):265-272.
Hamann CR, Bernard S, Hamann D, Hansen R, Thyssen JP. Is there a risk using hypoallergenic cosmetic pediatric products in the United States? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):1070-1071.
Simonsen AB, Johansen JD, Deleuran M, Mortz CG, Sommerlund M. Contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(2):395-405.
Malajian D, Belsito DV. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(2):232-237.
Lubbes S, Rustemeyer T, Sillevis Smitt JH, Schuttelaar ML, Middelkamp-Hup MA. Contact sensitization in Dutch children and adolescents with and without atopic dermatitis-a retrospective analysis. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(3):151-159.
Cattani CAS, Oppermann K, Perazzoli S, Guarda NH, Baréa P, Bonamigo RR. Sensitizing agents found in children and adolescents with recalcitrant atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study with a pediatric battery. An Bras Dermatol. 2022;97(3):307-314.
Silva V, Silva C, Soares P, Garrido EM, Borges F, Garrido J. Isothiazolinone biocides: chemistry, biological, and toxicity profiles. Molecules. 2020;25(4):991.
Akan A, Toyran M, Vezir E, et al. The patterns and clinical relevance of contact allergen sensitization in a pediatric population with atopic dermatitis. Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(6):1207-1213.
Belhadjali H, Mohamed M, Youssef M, Mandhouj S, Chakroun M, Zili J. Contact sensitization in atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 89 cases in Tunisia. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58(3):188-189.
Francuzik W, Geier J, Schubert S, Worm M. A case-control analysis of skin contact allergy in children and adolescents. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019;30(6):632-637.
Belhareth K, Korbi M, Belhadjali H, Soua Y, Youssef M, Zili J. Methylisothiazolinone in cosmetic products in Tunisia. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82(2):128-129.
Belloni Fortina A, Cooper SM, Spiewak R, Fontana E, Schnuch A, Uter W. Patch test results in children and adolescents across Europe. Analysis of the ESSCA Network 2002-2010. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015;26(5):446-455.
Giusti F, Massone F, Bertoni L, Pellacani G, Seidenari S. Contact sensitization to disperse dyes in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2003;20(5):393-397.
Mohamoud AA, Andersen F. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by textile dyes mimicking atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(2):119-120.
Vind-Kezunovic D, Johansen JD, Carlsen BC. Prevalence of and factors influencing sensitization to corticosteroids in a Danish patch test population. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64(6):325-329.
Foti C, Bonifazi E, Casulli C, Bonamonte D, Conserva A, Angelini G. Contact allergy to topical corticosteroids in children with atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;52(3):162-163.
Giordano-Labadie F, Rancé F, Pellegrin F, Bazex J, Dutau G, Schwarze HP. Frequency of contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 137 cases. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40(4):192-195.
Goon ATJ, Goh CL. Patch testing of Singapore children and adolescents: our experience over 18 years. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23(2):117-120.
Lee S, Wang HY, Kim E, et al. Clinical characteristics and genetic variation in atopic dermatitis patients with and without allergic contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol. 2018;28(5):637-643.
Mailhol C, Lauwers-Cances V, Rancé F, Paul C, Giordano-Labadie F. Prevalence and risk factors for allergic contact dermatitis to topical treatment in atopic dermatitis: a study in 641 children. Allergy. 2009;64(5):801-806.
Belloni Fortina A, Fontana E, Peserico A. Contact sensitization in children: a retrospective study of 2,614 children from a single center. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(4):399-404.
Uehara M, Sawai T. A longitudinal study of contact sensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125(3):366-368.
Jacob SE, Yang A, Herro E, Zhang C. Contact allergens in a pediatric population: association with atopic dermatitis and comparison with other North American referral centers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(10):29-35.
Isaksson M, Olhardt S, Rådehed J, Svensson Å. Children with atopic dermatitis should always be patch-tested if they have hand or foot dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(5):583-586.
Zug KA, Kornik R, Belsito DV, et al. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004. Dermatitis. 2008;19(4):202-208.
Jacob SE, Burk CJ, Connelly EA. Patch testing: another steroid-sparing agent to consider in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25(1):81-87.
Mäkelä L, Lammintausta K, Kalimo K. Contact sensitivity and atopic dermatitis: association with prognosis, a follow-up study in 801 atopic patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(2):76-80.

Auteurs

Khaoula Trimeche (K)

Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.

Ines Lahouel (I)

Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.

Hichem Belhadjali (H)

Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.

Nesrine Ben Salah (NB)

Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.

Monia Youssef (M)

Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.

Jameleddine Zili (J)

Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.

Classifications MeSH