Successful β-blocker introduction under intra-aortic balloon pumping and ivabradine in a patient with new-onset dilated cardiomyopathy and pulsus alternans: a case report.
Beta-blocker
Calcium overload
Case report
Intra-aortic balloon pump
Ivabradine
Left ventricular reverse remodelling
Mechanical alternans
Pulsus alternans
Journal
European heart journal. Case reports
ISSN: 2514-2119
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101730741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
02
05
2023
revised:
26
11
2023
accepted:
07
12
2023
medline:
28
12
2023
pubmed:
28
12
2023
entrez:
28
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pulsus alternans has been considered a sign of poor prognosis in patients undergoing treatments for heart failure. However, it may be overlooked in patients with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). The use of IABP and ivabradine for a β-blocker introduction in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and pulsus alternans and its consequence have never been reported. In a 16-year-old high school boy with idiopathic DCM [left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd), 72 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 18%], the introduction of carvedilol therapy failed, causing cardiogenic shock under inotropes. Therefore, an IABP support was provided, and he was transferred to our hospital. The arterial pressure waveform under IABP demonstrated pulsus alternans with sinus tachycardia at 135/min. Ivabradine reduced the heart rate to ∼100/min and eliminated the pulsus alternans neither decreasing the cardiac index nor increasing the pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Subsequently, carvedilol was reintroduced, and IABP and inotropes were discontinued. Then, 112 days after his transfer to our hospital, left ventricular reverse remodelling was confirmed (LVDd, 54 mm; LVEF, 44%), and he returned to school. The carvedilol dose reached 20 mg/day in 4 months after discharge, and further improvement was observed a year after discharge (LVDd, 54 mm; LVEF, 52%). Pulsus alternans is considered a predictor of poor prognosis. However, IABP and ivabradine may stabilize the haemodynamics in pulsus alternans, leading to a successful β-blocker introduction.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Pulsus alternans has been considered a sign of poor prognosis in patients undergoing treatments for heart failure. However, it may be overlooked in patients with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). The use of IABP and ivabradine for a β-blocker introduction in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and pulsus alternans and its consequence have never been reported.
Case summary
UNASSIGNED
In a 16-year-old high school boy with idiopathic DCM [left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd), 72 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 18%], the introduction of carvedilol therapy failed, causing cardiogenic shock under inotropes. Therefore, an IABP support was provided, and he was transferred to our hospital. The arterial pressure waveform under IABP demonstrated pulsus alternans with sinus tachycardia at 135/min. Ivabradine reduced the heart rate to ∼100/min and eliminated the pulsus alternans neither decreasing the cardiac index nor increasing the pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Subsequently, carvedilol was reintroduced, and IABP and inotropes were discontinued. Then, 112 days after his transfer to our hospital, left ventricular reverse remodelling was confirmed (LVDd, 54 mm; LVEF, 44%), and he returned to school. The carvedilol dose reached 20 mg/day in 4 months after discharge, and further improvement was observed a year after discharge (LVDd, 54 mm; LVEF, 52%).
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
Pulsus alternans is considered a predictor of poor prognosis. However, IABP and ivabradine may stabilize the haemodynamics in pulsus alternans, leading to a successful β-blocker introduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38152114
doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad620
pii: ytad620
pmc: PMC10751564
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
ytad620Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: None declared.