Functional audit of the use of megaprosthesis for limb reconstruction in musculoskeletal tumors - A retrospective single-center study.

Benign aggressive bone tumor Limb salvage surgery Malignant bone tumor Megaprosthesis

Journal

Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 23 11 2023
accepted: 26 11 2023
pmc-release: 01 03 2025
medline: 28 12 2023
pubmed: 28 12 2023
entrez: 28 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Medical advancements in musculoskeletal oncology has significantly reduced the mortality rate associated with limb-sparing surgery, making it comparable to amputation. The use of modular megaprosthesis for sarcoma treatment has now become a standard practice. However, these non-biological implants are not without their complications. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients who underwent wide resection of locally aggressive and malignant bone tumors, followed by reconstruction with megaprosthesis between January 2018 and January 2023 at tertiary care hospital. Patients were evaluated based on oncological outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. The study included a total of 30 patients, comprising 16 males and 14 females, with a mean age of 33.6 ± 15.6 years. They all underwent wide resection and reconstruction with megaprosthesis. Diagnosis among the patients included 19 cases of giant cell tumors, 5 cases of osteosarcomas, 2 cases of metastatic bone tumors, and 1 case each of chondrosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, multiple myeloma, and chondromyxoid fibroma. These tumors were predominantly located in the distal femur (15 patients) and proximal tibia (12 patients). The average follow-up period was 33 ± 21 months, resulting in an average final Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of 81 % ± 9 %. Complications were observed in 21 patients, with infection being the most common, specifically Type 4 (10 patients, 37 %), followed by Type 1 (4 patients, 13 %) and Type 3 (4 patients, 13 %). Two patients (7 %) experienced Type 5 complications, while three succumbed to their illnesses. Additionally, two patients required amputation, one due to local recurrence and the other due to a deep-seated infection. Megaprosthesis is a viable reconstruction option following wide resection of bone tumors. Infection remains the most common issue, and cost poses a significant challenge.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38152425
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.069
pii: S0972-978X(23)00345-8
pmc: PMC10749826
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

123-127

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Hawaibam Nongdamba (H)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Parshwanath Bondarde (P)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

V Danish (V)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Vikas Maheshwari (V)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Rahul Karn (R)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Vikas Olkha (V)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Mohit Dhingra (M)

Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Madhubhari Vathulya (M)

Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Classifications MeSH