What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?

BACKGROUND

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumor (D-TGCT), formerly known as pigmented villonodular synovitis, is a rare, locally aggressive, invasive soft tissue tumor that primarily occurs in the knee. Surgical excision is the main treatment option, but there is a high recurrence rate. Arthroscopic surgical techniques are emphasized because they are less traumatic and offer faster postoperative recovery, but detailed reports on arthroscopic techniques and outcomes of D-TGCT in large cohorts are still lacking.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the recurrence rate of knee D-TGCT after multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy? (2) What are the complications, knee ROM, pain score, and patient-reported outcomes for patients, and do they differ between patients with and without recurrence? (3) What factors are associated with recurrence after arthroscopic treatment in patients with D-TGCT?

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective study conducted between January 2010 and April 2021, we treated 295 patients with knee D-TGCTs. We considered patients undergoing initial surgical treatment with multiportal arthroscopic synovectomy as potentially eligible. Based on that, 27% (81 of 295) of patients were excluded because of recurrence after synovectomy performed at another institution. Of the 214 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17% (36 of 214) were lost to follow-up, leaving 83% (178 of 214) of patients in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (50 of 178) of patients were men and 72% (128 of 178) were women, with a median (range) age of 36 years (7 to 69). The median follow-up duration was 80 months (26 to 149). All patients underwent multiportal (anterior and posterior approaches) arthroscopic synovectomy, and all surgical protocols were determined by discussion among four surgeons after preoperative MRI. A combined open posterior incision was used for patients with lesions that invaded or surrounded the blood vessels and nerves or invaded the muscle space extraarticularly. Standard postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy was recommended for all patients with D-TGCT who had extraarticular and posterior compartment invasion; for patients with only anterior compartment invasion, radiotherapy was recommended for severe cases as assessed by the surgeons and radiologists based on preoperative MRI and intraoperative descriptions. Postoperative recurrence at 5 years was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator. The WOMAC score (0 to 96, with higher scores representing a worse outcome; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 8.5), the Lysholm knee score (0 to 100, with higher scores being better knee function; MCID 25.4), the VAS for pain (0 to 10, with higher scores representing more pain; MCID 2.46), and knee ROM were used to evaluate functional outcomes. Because we did not have preoperative patient-reported outcomes scores, we present data on the proportion of patients who achieved the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for each of those outcome metrics, which were 14.6 of 96 points on the WOMAC, 52.5 of 100 points on the Lysholm, and 2.32 of 10 points on the VAS.

RESULTS

The symptomatic or radiographically documented recurrence at 5 years was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7% to 17%) using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with a mean recurrence time of 33 ± 19 months. Of these, three were asymptomatic recurrences found during regular MRI reviews, and the remaining 19 underwent repeat surgery. There was one intraoperative complication (vascular injury) with no effect on postoperative limb function and eight patients with postoperative joint stiffness, seven of whom improved with prolonged rehabilitation and one with manipulation under anesthesia. No postradiotherapy complications were found. The proportion of patients who achieved the preestablished PASS was 99% (176 of 178) for the VAS pain score, 97% (173 of 178) for the WOMAC score, and 100% (178 of 178) for the Lysholm score. A lower percentage of patients with recurrence achieved the PASS for WOMAC score than patients without recurrence (86% [19] versus 99% [154], OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.52]; p = 0.01), whereas no difference was found in the percentage of VAS score (95% [21] versus 99% [155], OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.01 to 2.25]; p = 0.23) or Lysholm score (100% [22] versus 100% [156], OR 1 [95% CI 1 to 1]; p = 0.99). Moreover, patients in the recurrence group showed worse knee flexion (median 135° [100° to 135°] versus median 135° [80° to 135°]; difference of medians 0°; p = 0.03), worse WOMAC score (median 3.5 [0 to 19] versus median 1 [0 to 29]; difference of medians 2.5; p = 0.01), and higher VAS pain score (median 1 [0 to 4] versus median 0 [0 to 4]; difference of medians 1; p < 0.01) than those in the nonrecurrence group, although no differences reached the MCID. No factors were associated with D-TGCT recurrence, including the use of postoperative radiotherapy, surgical technique, and invasion extent.

CONCLUSION

This single-center, large-cohort retrospective study confirmed that multiportal arthroscopic surgery can be used to treat knee D-TGCTs with a low recurrence rate, few complications, and satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Surgeons should conduct a thorough preoperative evaluation, meticulous arthroscopic synovectomy, and regular postoperative follow-up when treating patients with D-TGCT to reduce postoperative recurrence. Because the available evidence does not appear to fully support the use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients with D-TGCTs and our study design is inadequate to resolve this controversial issue, future studies should look for more appropriate indications for radiotherapy, such as planning based on a more precise classification of lesion invasion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.