Training needs for staff providing remote services in general practice: a mixed-methods study.

e-consultations general practice knowledge remote consultation training needs video consultations

Journal

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
ISSN: 1478-5242
Titre abrégé: Br J Gen Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 19 05 2023
accepted: 30 08 2023
medline: 29 12 2023
pubmed: 29 12 2023
entrez: 28 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Contemporary general practice includes many kinds of remote encounter. The rise in telephone, video and online modalities for triage and clinical care requires clinicians and support staff to be trained, both individually and as teams, but evidence-based competencies have not previously been produced for general practice. To identify training needs, core competencies, and learning methods for staff providing remote encounters. Mixed-methods study in UK general practice. Data were collated from longitudinal ethnographic case studies of 12 general practices; a multi-stakeholder workshop; interviews with policymakers, training providers, and trainees; published research; and grey literature (such as training materials and surveys). Data were coded thematically and analysed using theories of individual and team learning. Learning to provide remote services occurred in the context of high workload, understaffing, and complex workflows. Low confidence and perceived unmet training needs were common. Training priorities for novice clinicians included basic technological skills, triage, ethics (for privacy and consent), and communication and clinical skills. Established clinicians' training priorities include advanced communication skills (for example, maintaining rapport and attentiveness), working within the limits of technologies, making complex judgements, coordinating multi-professional care in a distributed environment, and training others. Much existing training is didactic and technology focused. While basic knowledge was often gained using such methods, the ability and confidence to make complex judgements were usually acquired through experience, informal discussions, and on-the-job methods such as shadowing. Whole-team training was valued but rarely available. A draft set of competencies is offered based on the findings. The knowledge needed to deliver high-quality remote encounters to diverse patient groups is complex, collective, and organisationally embedded. The vital role of non-didactic training, for example, joint clinical sessions, case-based discussions, and in-person, whole-team, on-the-job training, needs to be recognised.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Contemporary general practice includes many kinds of remote encounter. The rise in telephone, video and online modalities for triage and clinical care requires clinicians and support staff to be trained, both individually and as teams, but evidence-based competencies have not previously been produced for general practice.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To identify training needs, core competencies, and learning methods for staff providing remote encounters.
DESIGN AND SETTING METHODS
Mixed-methods study in UK general practice.
METHOD METHODS
Data were collated from longitudinal ethnographic case studies of 12 general practices; a multi-stakeholder workshop; interviews with policymakers, training providers, and trainees; published research; and grey literature (such as training materials and surveys). Data were coded thematically and analysed using theories of individual and team learning.
RESULTS RESULTS
Learning to provide remote services occurred in the context of high workload, understaffing, and complex workflows. Low confidence and perceived unmet training needs were common. Training priorities for novice clinicians included basic technological skills, triage, ethics (for privacy and consent), and communication and clinical skills. Established clinicians' training priorities include advanced communication skills (for example, maintaining rapport and attentiveness), working within the limits of technologies, making complex judgements, coordinating multi-professional care in a distributed environment, and training others. Much existing training is didactic and technology focused. While basic knowledge was often gained using such methods, the ability and confidence to make complex judgements were usually acquired through experience, informal discussions, and on-the-job methods such as shadowing. Whole-team training was valued but rarely available. A draft set of competencies is offered based on the findings.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The knowledge needed to deliver high-quality remote encounters to diverse patient groups is complex, collective, and organisationally embedded. The vital role of non-didactic training, for example, joint clinical sessions, case-based discussions, and in-person, whole-team, on-the-job training, needs to be recognised.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38154935
pii: BJGP.2023.0251
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0251
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e17-e26

Informations de copyright

© The Authors.

Auteurs

Trisha Greenhalgh (T)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Rebecca Payne (R)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nina Hemmings (N)

Nuffield Trust, London; Health Education England, London, UK.

Helen Leach (H)

Unit of Academic Primary Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Isabel Hanson (I)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Anwar Khan (A)

GP trainer, and MRCGP examiner, Ching Way Medical Centre, London, UK.

Lisa Miller (L)

Health Education England, London, UK.

Emma Ladds (E)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Aileen Clarke (A)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Sara E Shaw (SE)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Francesca Dakin (F)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Sietse Wieringa (S)

Centre for Sustainable Health Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt (S)

Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Stuart D Faulkner (SD)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Richard Byng (R)

Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Asli Kalin (A)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Lucy Moore (L)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Joseph Wherton (J)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Laiba Husain (L)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Rebecca Rosen (R)

Nuffield Trust, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH