The experience of a tertiary referral center with laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones during 18 years.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Dec 2023
28 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
20
10
2023
accepted:
19
12
2023
medline:
29
12
2023
pubmed:
29
12
2023
entrez:
28
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, including its efficacy and feasibility in treatment of large renal stones. All patients who underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy operations in a referral center were enrolled from 2003 to 2020. The final analysis included 436 patients. The total stone free rate was 88.3% and the stone-free rate for staghorn/multiple stones versus other types of stones was 81% vs. 91% (P = 0.002). Likewise, the total operation duration was 158 ± 50 and the operation duration for staghorn/multiple stones versus other types of stones was 171 ± 51 min vs. 153 ± 49 min (P < 0.001). The operation duration (169 ± 51 vs. 155 ± 58 vs. 155 ± 42 min) and hospitalization (4.5 ± 2.3 vs. 4.0 ± 2.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.8) decreased with increasing the surgeons' experience over time. The outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for children versus adults versus geriatric patients and in patients with normal versus abnormal kidney anatomy did not reveal statistically significant differences. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy could be employed as an alternative surgical approach for patients with large kidney stones of any age or with kidney abnormalities provided that appropriate expertise is available to carry out the procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38155230
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50331-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-50331-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23102Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Türk, C. et al. EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 69, 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040
pubmed: 26318710
El-Zoghby, Z. M. et al. Urolithiasis and the risk of ESRD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 1409–1415. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.03210312 (2012).
doi: 10.2215/cjn.03210312
pubmed: 22745275
pmcid: 3430957
Peng, J. P. & Zheng, H. Kidney stones may increase the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: A PRISMA-Compliant meta-analysis. Medicine 96, e7898. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007898 (2017).
doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000007898
pubmed: 28834909
pmcid: 5572031
Sigurjonsdottir, V. K., Runolfsdottir, H. L., Indridason, O. S., Palsson, R. & Edvardsson, V. O. Impact of nephrolithiasis on kidney function. BMC Nephrol. 16, 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0126-1 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0126-1
pubmed: 26316205
pmcid: 4551564
Corsi, P. et al. Minimally invasive pyelolithotomy: Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques. Surg. Technol. Int. 34, 296–301 (2019).
pubmed: 31034578
Sola, J. E. & Neville, H. L. Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 44, 1631–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.04.001 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.04.001
pubmed: 19635317
Simforoosh, N., Radfar, M. H., Valipour, R., Dadpour, M. & Kashi, A. H. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the management of large renal stones with intrarenal pelvis anatomy. Urol. J. 18, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.5576 (2020).
doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5576
pubmed: 32281090
Basiri, A. et al. X-ray free minimally invasive surgery for urolithiasis in pregnancy. Urol. J. 13, 2496–2501 (2016).
pubmed: 26945653
Kyriazis, I. et al. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J. Urol. 33, 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8
pubmed: 25218854
Namasivayam, S. P. Perioperative respiratory compromise in patients undergoing PCNL-A case series. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 7, 2310–2312. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2013/7038.3509 (2013).
doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2013/7038.3509
Unsal, A. et al. Prediction of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Urology 79, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.06.038 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.06.038
pubmed: 21855965
Gaur, D. D., Agarwal, D. K., Purohit, K. C. & Darshane, A. S. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J. Urol. 151, 927–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35124-8 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35124-8
pubmed: 8126827
Soltani, M. H., Hossein Kashi, A., Farshid, S., Mantegy, S. J. & Valizadeh, R. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating the patients with staghorn kidney stones: A randomized clinical trial. Urol. J. 19, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.6831 (2021).
doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6831
pubmed: 34927230
Nouralizadeh, A. et al. Bilateral laparoscopic stone surgery for renal stones- A case series. Urol. J. 14, 5043–5046. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v14i6.3802 (2017).
doi: 10.22037/uj.v14i6.3802
pubmed: 29101758
Radfar, M. H. & Kashi, A. H. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for A staghorn stone in A patient with history of cystectomy and ileal conduit. Urol. J. 17, 522–524. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.5589 (2020).
doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5589
pubmed: 32281089
Sharifiaghdas, F., Kashi, A. H. & Eshratkhah, R. Evaluating percutaneous nephrolithotomy-induced kidney damage by measuring urinary concentrations of β2-microglobulin. Urol. J. 8, 277–282 (2011).
pubmed: 22090045
Nouralizadeh, A., Sichani, M. M. & Kashi, A. H. Impacts of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate during the first few days after surgery. Urol. Res. 39, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0310-5 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0310-5
pubmed: 20852853
Swearingen, R. et al. Zero-fragment nephrolithotomy: A multi-center evaluation of robotic pyelolithotomy and nephrolithotomy for treating renal stones. Eur. Urol. 72, 1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.021 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.021
pubmed: 28085668
Lee, J. W. et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvocalyceal system. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Techn. A 24, 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0046 (2014).
doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0046
Mao, T., Wei, N., Yu, J. & Lu, Y. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: A meta-analysis. J. Int. Med. Res. 49, 300060520983136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520983136 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/0300060520983136
pubmed: 33472474
Schulster, M. L., Sidhom, D. A., Sturgeon, K., Borin, J. F. & Bjurlin, M. A. Outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy. J. Robot. Surg. 14, 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2
pubmed: 31317314
Kashi, A. H. et al. Comparing the outcomes of papillary and non-papillary access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J. Urol. 41, 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04256-0 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04256-0
pubmed: 36527469
Desai, M. et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J. Endourol. 25, 1263–1268. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0055 (2011).
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0055
pubmed: 21774666
Xiao, Y. et al. Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: A single-center randomized controlled trial. World J. Urol. 37, 1441–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x
pubmed: 30361956
Nouralizadeh, A. et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Techn. A 22, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2011.0302 (2012).
doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0302
Soltani, M. H., Kashi, A. H., Farshid, S., Mantegy, S. J. & Valizadeh, R. J. U. J. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating the patients with staghorn kidney stones: A randomized clinical trial. Urol. J. 19, 28 (2022).
Stein, R. J. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy: Technique and outcomes. J. Endourol. 22, 1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0003 (2008).
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0003
pubmed: 18578658
Kramer, B. A., Hammond, L. & Schwartz, B. F. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: Indications and technique. J. Endourol. 21, 860–861. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0410 (2007).
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0410
pubmed: 17867941
Singh, V., Sinha, R. J., Gupta, D. K. & Pandey, M. Prospective randomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for solitary large pelvic kidney stones. Urologia Internationalis 92, 392–395. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353973 (2014).
doi: 10.1159/000353973
pubmed: 24135482
Gupta, N. P., Mishra, S., Seth, A. & Anand, A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in abnormal kidneys: Single-center experience. Urology 73, 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.070 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.070
pubmed: 19193423
An, L., Xiong, L., Chen, L., Ye, X. & Huang, X. Concomitant treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by renal calculi with laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy via 19.5F rigid nephroscope: A report of 12 cases. J. Investing. Surg. 35, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2020.1824248 (2022).
doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1824248
Jurkiewicz, B., Zabkowski, T., Jobs, K., Samotyjek, J. & Jung, A. Combined use of pyelolithotomy and endoscopy: An alternative surgical treatment for staghorn urolithiasis in children. Urol. J. 13, 2599–2604 (2016).
pubmed: 27085559
Erçil, H., Karkin, K. & Vuruşkan, E. Is laparoscopic pyelolithotomy an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients?. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 39, 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05367-4 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05367-4
pubmed: 36627447
Seetahal, S., Obirieze, A., Cornwell, E. E. 3rd., Fullum, T. & Tran, D. Open abdominal surgery: A risk factor for future laparoscopic surgery?. Am. J. Surg. 209, 623–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.017 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.017
pubmed: 25698077
Tabibian, N., Swehli, E., Boyd, A., Umbreen, A. & Tabibian, J. H. Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.) 15, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021
pubmed: 28203370
Wang, B. et al. Comparative study of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open ipsilateral nephrectomy after percutaneous nephrostomy: A multicenter analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Techn. A 30, 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0746 (2020).
doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0746
Radfar, M. H. et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in patients with previous ipsilateral renal stone surgery. Urologia 88, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391560319890993 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/0391560319890993
pubmed: 31868562
Mantica, G. et al. The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol. Nephrol. 74, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04587-0 (2022).
doi: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04587-0
pubmed: 35147384