Trajectories of Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration: A Latent Class Growth Analysis.


Journal

Diseases of the colon and rectum
ISSN: 1530-0358
Titre abrégé: Dis Colon Rectum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372764

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 5 3 2024
pubmed: 2 1 2024
entrez: 29 12 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Information on the course of quality of life after surgery for advanced cancers within the pelvis is important to guide patient decision-making; however, the current evidence is limited. To identify quality-of-life trajectory classes and their predictors after pelvic exenteration. Prospective cohort study. Highly specialized quaternary pelvic exenteration referral center. Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration due to advanced/recurrent cancers within the pelvis between July 2008 and July 2022. Quality-of-life data included the 36-item Short-Form Survey (physical and mental component scores) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instruments, which were collected at 11 distinct points from baseline to 5 years postoperatively. Predictors included patient characteristics and surgical outcomes. Latent class analysis was used to identify the likelihood of a better quality-of-life class, and logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of the identified classes. The study included 565 participants. Two distinct quality-of-life trajectory classes were identified for the Physical Component Score (class 1: high stable and class 2: high decreasing). Three distinct classes were identified for the Mental Component Score (class 1: high increasing, class 2: moderate stable, and class 3: moderate decreasing) and for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal total score (class 1: high increasing, class 2: high decreasing, and class 3: low decreasing). Across the 3 quality-of-life domains, overall survival probabilities were also higher in class 1 ( p < 0.0001). Age, repeat exenteration, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical margin, length of operation, and hospital stay were significant predictors of quality-of-life classes. This study was conducted at a single highly specialized quaternary pelvic exenteration referral center, and findings may not apply to other centers. This study demonstrates that quality of life after pelvic exenteration diverges into distinct trajectories, with most patients reporting an optimal course. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:La información sobre la evolución en la calidad de vida después de cirugía en cánceres avanzados situados en la pelvis es importante para guiar la toma de decisiones sobre el paciente; sin embargo, la evidencia actual es muy limitada.OBJETIVO:Identificar las clases de trayectorias en la calidad de vida y sus factores pronóstico después de la exenteración pélvica.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes prospectivo.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia altamente especializado en la exenteración pélvica cuaternaria.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer avanzados/recurrentes situados en la pelvis entre Julio de 2008 y Julio de 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los datos sobre la calidad de vida incluyeron el Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 (puntuaciones de componentes físicos y mentales) y la evaluación funcional entre la terapia del cáncer/-herramientas colorrectales, recopilados en 11 puntos distintos desde el diagnóstico hasta los 5 años después de la operación.Los predictores incluyeron las características de los pacientes y los resultados quirúrgicos. Se utilizó el análisis de clases latentes para identificar la probabilidad de una mejor calidad de vida y se utilizaron modelos de regresión logística para identificar predictores de las clases identificadas.RESULTADOS:El estudio incluyó a 565 participantes. Se identificaron dos clases distintas de trayectorias de calidad de vida para la puntuación del componente físico (clase 1: alta estable y clase 2: alta decreciente), se identificaron tres clases distintas para la puntuación del componente mental (clase 1: alta creciente; clase 2: moderadamente estable; y clase 3: moderada disminución) y para la evaluación funcional de la terapia contra el cáncer-puntuación total colorrectal (clase 1: aumento alto; clase 2: disminución alta; y clase 3: disminución baja). En los tres dominios de calidad de vida, las probabilidades de supervivencia general también fueron mayores en las clases 1 (p <0,0001). La edad, las exenteraciones pélvicas repetidas, la terapia neoadyuvante, el margen quirúrgico, la duración de la operación y la estadía hospitalaria fueron predictores significativos en las clases de calidad de vida.LIMITACIONES:El presente estudio fué realizado en un único centro de referencia altamente especializado en exenteración pélvica cuaternaria y es posible que los hallazgos no se apliquen a otros centros.CONCLUSIONES:Demostramos con nuestro estudio que la calidad de vida después de la exenteración pélvica diverge en trayectorias distintas, y que la mayoría de los pacientes nos reportaron de una évolución óptima. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Information on the course of quality of life after surgery for advanced cancers within the pelvis is important to guide patient decision-making; however, the current evidence is limited.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To identify quality-of-life trajectory classes and their predictors after pelvic exenteration.
DESIGN METHODS
Prospective cohort study.
SETTINGS METHODS
Highly specialized quaternary pelvic exenteration referral center.
PATIENTS METHODS
Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration due to advanced/recurrent cancers within the pelvis between July 2008 and July 2022.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES METHODS
Quality-of-life data included the 36-item Short-Form Survey (physical and mental component scores) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal instruments, which were collected at 11 distinct points from baseline to 5 years postoperatively. Predictors included patient characteristics and surgical outcomes. Latent class analysis was used to identify the likelihood of a better quality-of-life class, and logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of the identified classes.
RESULTS RESULTS
The study included 565 participants. Two distinct quality-of-life trajectory classes were identified for the Physical Component Score (class 1: high stable and class 2: high decreasing). Three distinct classes were identified for the Mental Component Score (class 1: high increasing, class 2: moderate stable, and class 3: moderate decreasing) and for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal total score (class 1: high increasing, class 2: high decreasing, and class 3: low decreasing). Across the 3 quality-of-life domains, overall survival probabilities were also higher in class 1 ( p < 0.0001). Age, repeat exenteration, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical margin, length of operation, and hospital stay were significant predictors of quality-of-life classes.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study was conducted at a single highly specialized quaternary pelvic exenteration referral center, and findings may not apply to other centers.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that quality of life after pelvic exenteration diverges into distinct trajectories, with most patients reporting an optimal course. See Video Abstract .
TRAYECTORIAS EN LA CALIDAD DE VIDA DESPUS DE EXENTERACIN PLVICA ANLISIS DE CRECIMIENTO DE CLASES LATENTES UNASSIGNED
ANTECEDENTES:La información sobre la evolución en la calidad de vida después de cirugía en cánceres avanzados situados en la pelvis es importante para guiar la toma de decisiones sobre el paciente; sin embargo, la evidencia actual es muy limitada.OBJETIVO:Identificar las clases de trayectorias en la calidad de vida y sus factores pronóstico después de la exenteración pélvica.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes prospectivo.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia altamente especializado en la exenteración pélvica cuaternaria.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer avanzados/recurrentes situados en la pelvis entre Julio de 2008 y Julio de 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los datos sobre la calidad de vida incluyeron el Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 (puntuaciones de componentes físicos y mentales) y la evaluación funcional entre la terapia del cáncer/-herramientas colorrectales, recopilados en 11 puntos distintos desde el diagnóstico hasta los 5 años después de la operación.Los predictores incluyeron las características de los pacientes y los resultados quirúrgicos. Se utilizó el análisis de clases latentes para identificar la probabilidad de una mejor calidad de vida y se utilizaron modelos de regresión logística para identificar predictores de las clases identificadas.RESULTADOS:El estudio incluyó a 565 participantes. Se identificaron dos clases distintas de trayectorias de calidad de vida para la puntuación del componente físico (clase 1: alta estable y clase 2: alta decreciente), se identificaron tres clases distintas para la puntuación del componente mental (clase 1: alta creciente; clase 2: moderadamente estable; y clase 3: moderada disminución) y para la evaluación funcional de la terapia contra el cáncer-puntuación total colorrectal (clase 1: aumento alto; clase 2: disminución alta; y clase 3: disminución baja). En los tres dominios de calidad de vida, las probabilidades de supervivencia general también fueron mayores en las clases 1 (p <0,0001). La edad, las exenteraciones pélvicas repetidas, la terapia neoadyuvante, el margen quirúrgico, la duración de la operación y la estadía hospitalaria fueron predictores significativos en las clases de calidad de vida.LIMITACIONES:El presente estudio fué realizado en un único centro de referencia altamente especializado en exenteración pélvica cuaternaria y es posible que los hallazgos no se apliquen a otros centros.CONCLUSIONES:Demostramos con nuestro estudio que la calidad de vida después de la exenteración pélvica diverge en trayectorias distintas, y que la mayoría de los pacientes nos reportaron de una évolución óptima. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38156798
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003080
pii: 00003453-202404000-00010
doi:

Types de publication

Video-Audio Media Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

531-540

Informations de copyright

Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.

Références

van Kessel CS, Solomon MJ. Understanding the philosophy, anatomy, and surgery of the extra-TME plane of locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer; single institution experience with international benchmarking. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:5058.
Koh CE, Solomon MJ, Brown KG, et al. The evolution of pelvic exenteration practice at a single center: lessons learned from over 500 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:627–635.
Blake J, Koh CE, Steffens D, et al. Outcomes following repeat exenteration for locally advanced pelvic malignancy. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23:646–652.
PelvEx C. Surgical and survival outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer: results from an international collaboration. Ann Surg. 2019;269:315–321.
PelvEx C. Factors affecting outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105:650–657.
Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Young JM, et al. Cohort study of long-term survival and quality of life following pelvic exenteration. BJS Open. 2018;2:328–335.
Young JM, Badgery-Parker T, Masya LM, et al. Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:277–287.
Austin KKS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Quality of life of survivors after pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1121–1126.
McCarthy ASE, Solomon MJ, Koh CE, Firouzbakht A, Jackson SA, Steffens D. Quality of life and functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration and sacrectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22:521–528.
Alahmadi R, Solomon MJ, Steffens D. ASO author reflections: quality of life and survival outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:5236–5237.
Harji DP, Williams A, McKigney N, et al. Utilising quality of life outcome trajectories to aid patient decision making in pelvic exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48:2238–2249.
Qaderi SM, van der Heijden JAG, Verhoeven RHA, de Wilt JHW, Custers JAE; PLCRC study group. Trajectories of health-related quality of life and psychological distress in patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2021;158:144–155.
Lee J, Shafiq M, Malhotra R, Ozdemir S, Teo I, Malhotra C. Trajectories of health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer during the last year of life: findings from the COMPASS study. BMC Palliat Care. 2022;21:183.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–577.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky DS, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:181–195.
Proust-Lima C, Philipps V, Liquet B. Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R package LCMM. J Stat Softw. 2017;78:1–56.
Rausa E, Kelly ME, Bonavina L, O’Connell PR, Winter DC. A systematic review examining quality of life following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:430–436.
Kypriotakis G, Vidrine DJ, Francis LE, Rose JH. The longitudinal relationship between quality of life and survival in advanced stage cancer. Psychooncology. 2016;25:225–231.
Kristensen A, Grønberg BH, Fløtten O, Kaasa S, Solheim TS. Trajectory of health-related quality of life during the last year of life in patients with advanced non-small–cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:9351–9358.
Brown KGM, Solomon MJ, Koh CE. Pelvic exenteration surgery: the evolution of radical surgical techniques for advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:745–754.

Auteurs

Daniel Steffens (D)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Joshua Blake (J)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Michael J Solomon (MJ)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Peter Lee (P)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Kirk K S Austin (KKS)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Christopher M Byrne (CM)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Sascha Karunaratne (S)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Cherry E Koh (CE)

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH