COVID-19 in Pakistan: A national analysis of five pandemic waves.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 20 01 2023
accepted: 12 12 2023
medline: 2 1 2024
pubmed: 2 1 2024
entrez: 29 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic showed distinct waves where cases ebbed and flowed. While each country had slight, nuanced differences, lessons from each wave with country-specific details provides important lessons for prevention, understanding medical outcomes and the role of vaccines. This paper compares key characteristics from the five different COVID-19 waves in Pakistan. Data was sourced from daily national situation reports (Sitreps) prepared by the National Emergency Operations Centre (NEOC) in Islamabad. We use specific criteria to define COVID-19 waves. The start of each COVID-19 wave is marked by the day of the lowest number of daily cases preceding a sustained increase, while the end is the day with the lowest number of cases following a 7-days decline, which should be lower than the 7 days following it. Key variables such as COVID-19 tests, cases, and deaths with their rates of change to the peak and then to the trough are used to draw descriptive comparisons. Additionally, a linear regression model estimates daily new COVID-19 deaths in Pakistan. Pakistan saw five distinct waves, each of which displayed the typical topology of a complete infectious disease epidemic. The time from wave-start to peak became progressively shorter, and from wave-peak to trough, progressively longer. Each wave appears to also be getting shorter, except for wave 4, which lasted longer than wave 3. A one percent increase in vaccinations decreased deaths by 0.38% (95% CI: -0.67, -0.08) in wave 5 and the association is statistically significant. Each wave displayed distinct characteristics that must be interpreted in the context of the level of response and the variant driving the epidemic. Key indicators suggest that COVID-19 preventive measures kept pace with the disease. Waves 1 and 2 were mainly about prevention and learning how to clinically manage patients. Vaccination started late during wave 3 and its impact on hospitalizations and deaths became visible in wave 5. The impact of highly virulent strains Alpha/B.1.1.7 and Delta/B.1.617.2 variants during wave 3 and milder but more infectious Omicron/B.1.1.529 during wave 5 are apparent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38157382
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281326
pii: PONE-D-23-01793
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0281326

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Ahmad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Taimoor Ahmad (T)

Research and Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Mujahid Abdullah (M)

Research and Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Abdul Mueed (A)

Research and Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Faisal Sultan (F)

Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.

Ayesha Khan (A)

Akhter Hameed Khan Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Adnan Ahmad Khan (AA)

Research and Development Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ministry of National Health Services, Regulation and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Classifications MeSH