Transvenous lead extraction safety and efficacy in infected and non-infected patients using mechanical-only tools, prospective registry from a high-volume center.

cardiac implantable electronic devices complications infection mechanical-only tools transvenous lead extraction

Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 14 09 2023
revised: 01 12 2023
accepted: 21 12 2023
medline: 2 1 2024
pubmed: 2 1 2024
entrez: 29 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a well-established treatment option for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) complications. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TLE in CIED infection and non-CIED infection patients. Consecutive patients who underwent TLE between 2016 and 2022 entered the EXTRACT Registry. Models of prediction were constructed for peri-procedural clinical and procedural success and the incidence of major complications, including death in 30 days. The registry enrolled 504 patients (mean age 66.6 ± 12.8 years, 65.7% male). Complete procedural success was achieved in 474 patients (94.0%) and clinical success in 492 patients (97.6%). The total number of major and minor complications was 16 (3.2%) and 51 (10%), respectively. Three patients (0.6%) died during the procedure. New York Heart Association class IV and C-reactive protein levels defined before the procedure were independent predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days in CIED infection patients. The time since the last preceding procedure and platelet count before the procedure were independent predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days in non-CIED infection patients. TLE is safe and successfully performed in most patients, with a low major complication rate. CIED infection patients do better regarding peri-procedural clinical success and complete procedural success. Still, CIED infection predicts higher 30-day mortality compared with non-CIED infection patients. Predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days, differ between CIED infection and non-CIED infection patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a well-established treatment option for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) complications.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TLE in CIED infection and non-CIED infection patients.
METHODS METHODS
Consecutive patients who underwent TLE between 2016 and 2022 entered the EXTRACT Registry. Models of prediction were constructed for peri-procedural clinical and procedural success and the incidence of major complications, including death in 30 days.
RESULTS RESULTS
The registry enrolled 504 patients (mean age 66.6 ± 12.8 years, 65.7% male). Complete procedural success was achieved in 474 patients (94.0%) and clinical success in 492 patients (97.6%). The total number of major and minor complications was 16 (3.2%) and 51 (10%), respectively. Three patients (0.6%) died during the procedure. New York Heart Association class IV and C-reactive protein levels defined before the procedure were independent predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days in CIED infection patients. The time since the last preceding procedure and platelet count before the procedure were independent predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days in non-CIED infection patients.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
TLE is safe and successfully performed in most patients, with a low major complication rate. CIED infection patients do better regarding peri-procedural clinical success and complete procedural success. Still, CIED infection predicts higher 30-day mortality compared with non-CIED infection patients. Predictors of any major complication, including death in 30 days, differ between CIED infection and non-CIED infection patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38157921
pii: S1547-5271(23)03066-7
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Sylwia Gladysz-Wanha (S)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. Electronic address: sylwia.gladysz@gmail.com.

Michał Joniec (M)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Wojciech Wanha (W)

Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Eugeniusz Piłat (E)

Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Anna Drzewiecka (A)

Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Rafał Gardas (R)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Jolanta Biernat (J)

Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Andrzej Węglarzy (A)

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care with Cardiac Supervision, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Krzysztof S Golba (KS)

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland; Department of Electrocardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center of the Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Classifications MeSH