Endoscopic Management of Gastric Band Erosion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Banding
Bariatric
Endoscopy
Erosion
Surgery
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Dec 2023
29 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
30
08
2023
accepted:
11
12
2023
revised:
08
12
2023
medline:
2
1
2024
pubmed:
2
1
2024
entrez:
29
12
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Gastric band erosion may be seen in up to 3% of patients. Endoscopic intervention has become increasingly utilized due to its minimally invasive nature. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the role of endoscopic removal for eroded gastric bands. Individualized search strategies were developed for PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Outcomes included technical success, clinical success, procedure duration, adverse events, and surgical conversion. Pooled proportions were analyzed using random effects models. Heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed with I Ten studies (n=282 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Mean age was 40.68±7.25 years with average duration of band placement of 38.49±19.88 months. Pre-operative BMI was 42.76±1.06 kg/m Endoscopic intervention is a highly effective and safe modality for the treatment of gastric band erosion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gastric band erosion may be seen in up to 3% of patients. Endoscopic intervention has become increasingly utilized due to its minimally invasive nature. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the role of endoscopic removal for eroded gastric bands.
METHODS
METHODS
Individualized search strategies were developed for PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Outcomes included technical success, clinical success, procedure duration, adverse events, and surgical conversion. Pooled proportions were analyzed using random effects models. Heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed with I
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ten studies (n=282 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Mean age was 40.68±7.25 years with average duration of band placement of 38.49±19.88 months. Pre-operative BMI was 42.76±1.06 kg/m
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Endoscopic intervention is a highly effective and safe modality for the treatment of gastric band erosion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38158502
doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06995-4
pii: 10.1007/s11695-023-06995-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Gloy VL et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f5934.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934
pubmed: 24149519
pmcid: 3806364
Maciejewski ML et al. c. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1046–55.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2317
pubmed: 27579793
pmcid: 5112115
Adams TD et al. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA. 2012;308(11):1122–31.
doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11164
pubmed: 22990271
pmcid: 3744888
Sjöström L et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066254
pubmed: 17715408
Karlsson J et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes. 2007;31(8):1248–61.
doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803573
Tice JA et al. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121(10):885–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.036
pubmed: 18823860
Ibrahim AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(9):835–42.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1093
pubmed: 28514487
pmcid: 5710463
Meir E, Van Baden M. Adjustable silicone gastric banding and band erosion: personal experience and hypotheses. Obes Surg. 1999;9(2):191–3.
doi: 10.1381/096089299765553485
pubmed: 10340777
Niville E, Dams A, Vlasselaers J. Lap-Band erosion: incidence and treatment. Obes Surg. 2001;11(6):744–7.
doi: 10.1381/09608920160558704
pubmed: 11775574
Abu-Abeid S et al. The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(6):861–3.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9195-x
pubmed: 12618932
Favretti F et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(2):168–75.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9043-0
pubmed: 17476867
Regusci L et al. Gastroscopic removal of an adjustable gastric band after partial intragastric migration. Obes Surg. 2003;13(2):281–4.
doi: 10.1381/096089203764467216
pubmed: 12740139
Dao T et al. Pregnancy outcomes after gastric-bypass surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):762–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.041
pubmed: 17161090
Chisholm J et al. Gastric band erosion in 63 cases: endoscopic removal and rebanding evaluated. Obes Surg. 2011;21(11):1676–81.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0468-0
pubmed: 21710298
Aarts EO et al. Intragastric band erosion: experiences with gastrointestinal endoscopic removal. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(5):1567–72.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1567
pubmed: 25663775
pmcid: 4316098
Blero D et al. Endoscopic removal of dysfunctioning bands or rings after restrictive bariatric procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):468–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.020
pubmed: 19748612
Dogan ÜB et al. Endoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 7-year series of 14 patients. Can J Surg. 2014;57(2):106–11.
doi: 10.1503/cjs.001313
pubmed: 24666448
pmcid: 3968203
Dogan UB, Dal MB. An 8-year experience with endoscopic management of eroded gastric bands. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(5):e140–4.
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000195
pubmed: 26429055
Liberati A et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):W65–94.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
pubmed: 19622512
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
pubmed: 3802833
Kendall MG, Stuart A, Ord J. Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics. London: New York: Edward Arnold. 1994: Halsted Press.
Riley RD, Higgins J, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549
pubmed: 21310794
Higgins JP et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327(7414):557–60.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
pubmed: 12958120
pmcid: 192859
Overton RC. A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(3):354.
doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.3.354
Wells GA et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Oxford; 2000. https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Easterbrook PJ et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337(8746):867–72.
doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y
pubmed: 1672966
Egger M et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315(7109):629–34.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
pubmed: 9310563
pmcid: 2127453
Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63.
doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
pubmed: 10877304
Mozzi E et al. Treatment of band erosion: feasibility and safety of endoscopic band removal. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(12):3918–22.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1820-0
pubmed: 21792722
Neto MP et al. Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustable gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(4):423–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.09.016
pubmed: 19926530
Robinson TJ et al. Endoscopic removal of eroded laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: a preferred approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(8):1030–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.034
pubmed: 32540149
Shehab H, Gawdat K. Endoscopic management of eroded bands following banded-gastric bypass (with video). Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1804–8.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2548-2
pubmed: 28091893
Spann MD et al. Endoscopic management of erosion after banded bariatric procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(11):1875–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.07.025
pubmed: 28870760
Jess P, Fonnest G. Gastroscopic treatment of gastric band penetrating the gastric wall. Dan Med Bull. 1999;46(5):428.
pubmed: 10605623
Lattuada E et al. Band erosion following gastric banding: how to treat it. Obes Surg. 2007;17(3):329–33.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9060-z
pubmed: 17546840
Evans JA et al. Endoscopic removal of eroded bands in vertical banded gastroplasty: a novel use of endoscopic scissors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(5):801–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.036
pubmed: 17055879
Karmali S et al. Endoscopic management of eroded prosthesis in vertical banded gastroplasty patients. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(1):98–102.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0532-1
pubmed: 19517187
Silecchia G et al. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding: prospective evaluation of intragastric migration of the lap-band. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(4):229–34.
doi: 10.1097/00129689-200108000-00001
pubmed: 11525366
Sarker S et al. Early and late complications following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Am Surg. 2004;70(2):146–9. discussion 149-50
doi: 10.1177/000313480407000210
pubmed: 15011918
Felinski M et al. Gastric band erosion. In: Complications in Bariatric Surgery; 2018. p. 115–22.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75841-1_9
Di Lorenzo N et al. Intragastric gastric band migration: erosion: an analysis of multicenter experience on 177 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1151–7.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2566-z
pubmed: 23073681